- Joined
- Jan 29, 2011
- Messages
- 11,265
- Reaction score
- 2,921
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
First of all, and I've said this before, I have not yet decided on who I am voting for. I will likely not decide until close to election time.So then two years after the end of a recession we have 3 million more unemployed or under employed (154 million X 16.2%) and you think that is worthy of re-election? When does this become the Obama economy?
But seriously, Con, where do you get off even asking?
Here you are insinuating that Obama is not "worthy" of four more year because there's an additional 3 million underemployed after 29 months on the job.
But now let's compare that to other presidents you voted to give four more years to, shall we?
Ronald Reagan: 3,197,829 unemployed in a workforce 1/3rd smaller than today
1/1981: UR: 7.5%; WF: 108M = 8,101,950 unemployed
6/1983: UR: 10.1%; WF: 112M = 11,299,779 unemployed
1/1981: UR: 7.5%; WF: 108M = 8,101,950 unemployed
6/1983: UR: 10.1%; WF: 112M = 11,299,779 unemployed
Bush: 4,649,368 underemployed in a workforce 4% smaller than today
1/2001: UR: 7.3%; WF: 144M = 10,497,400 underunemployed
6/2003: UR: 10.3%; WF: 147M = 15,146,768 underunemployed
1/2001: UR: 7.3%; WF: 144M = 10,497,400 underunemployed
6/2003: UR: 10.3%; WF: 147M = 15,146,768 underunemployed
Obama loses 3 million jobs in 29 months to underemployment. Conservative: "Impeach! Impeach!"
Hypocrite, thy name be Conservative
Last edited: