• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump's response to Michael Cohen's plea deal, dissected

Paying hush money is not a campaign expenditure -- it doesn't further the campaign in any way. It only protects the reputation of the candidate.

My argument is the same as it's been since Cohen pled -- and now, thankfully, one of MSNBC's top legal advisors explains why it's not an "issue."

But - keep hope alive.

but............he did not report it at the time, meaning that if nothing else he did not want to report it because it was something he did not want to be public. As such, he did something wrong any way you look at it.
 
LOL

The subject of this thread is Trump's response to Cohen.

By the way, it's "Dershowitz" not "Hershowitz."

Your ending blurb about Trump not supporting the Constitution is just more deflective crybaby stuff from you. Not on topic still.

No, it is not crybaby stuff. It is the job of the President and he is NOT doing it. It is serious.

May I remind you of the oath of office:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." Defending the Constitution means defending the laws of the United States.
 
Last edited:
You're right -- I'm not an attorney, which is why I'm listening to REAL attorneys -- in this case, MSNBC's Dershowitz.

Why are you pretending to know the law?

Honey bunch, no matter which ID's you use, its always the same. If a 100 lawyers said that Trump and Cohen were guilty, but you found one that said they were innocent, that would be the only one you listened to. The American justice system spoke, and Trump was found to be an unindicted co conspirator. If you dont like it, get the hell out of this country.

We have nothing further to discuss "Howie".
 
Honey bunch, no matter which ID's you use, its always the same. If a 100 lawyers said that Trump and Cohen were guilty, but you found one that said they were innocent, that would be the only one you listened to. The American justice system spoke, and Trump was found to be an unindicted co conspirator. If you dont like it, get the hell out of this country.

We have nothing further to discuss "Howie".

Sugarplum, just wait and see.
 
Sugarplum, just wait and see.

Well my sweets, I waited and now find that David Pecker himself is spilling his guts to the Justice Department. So far he has confirmed most of the details of trumps election fraud.
 
Well my sweets, I waited and now find that David Pecker himself is spilling his guts to the Justice Department. So far he has confirmed most of the details of trumps election fraud.

LOL -- they can investigate until the cows come home -- it won't help them.

And, when I said "wait and see," I didn't mean just a couple of hours -- I meant wait and see the outcome of what bearing this will (or won't) have on Trump.
 
LOL -- they can investigate until the cows come home -- it won't help them.

And, when I said "wait and see," I didn't mean just a couple of hours -- I meant wait and see the outcome of what bearing this will (or won't) have on Trump.

The rats have already begun to desert the sinking ship. The only question remaining is who will be next.
 
Back
Top Bottom