• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump's Dangerous Threats Against the Media

Godwin’s law in action.



Godwin is not free of Godwin’s law.

Yes he is. See below....






Godwin’s law will be expanded because of Trump. It now includes invoking Russians.

No it doesn't. You'd just like it to be so because your arses keep getting burned on the Russian Thingy. It won't go away. The reason is that Russia and Polonium Putin are ever present in the Oval Office.


Most people are lost in the woods on Godwin's Law.

Youse think it's something it isn't.

And it isn't what you think it is. Find out about Godwin's Law Laws. It will save an embarrassment when youse misapply it as most people do. As you're no doubt doing now in your typically erroneous and incomplete knowledge of it and in the general and repeated misunderstanding and misapplication of it.

Godwin's Law Laws.

For instance, after Charlottesville Godwin came forward publicly to say we have the right to tell a Nazi to his face he's a Nazi. Godwin said this is entirely consistent with his own Godwin's Law. Which also means I have the true freedom to tell a Putin-Trump Rower that he's, well, a Putin-Trump Rower. After all, we are what we are whatever we are. I might even ask Godwin about your new Russian Rule thingy.


Row, row, row your boat.....
 
Last edited:
The Right has spent decades tryng to gain control over the MSM they don't like while promoting the highly financed mass of Right Wing media they love and depend on.

Trump has been delivered to 'em as their ticket. When the Right follows Trump in pursuit of the "enemy of the people" MSM they name 'em, to include CNN, MSNBC, NYT, WaPo and so on. The term "enemy of the people" is an ugly one indeed.

So the Putin-Trump Rowers know this is it. That it's now or never. And with the next quadrennial election coming it sure does look like never. All this would have been for naught. The one gain from it however is that with Trump as potus the Armband Right has exposed itself concerning the MSM, the First Amendment, the Constitution, and unmistakably so. I dare say moreover, never again.

Neither party, our government, and especially a few rich people should control our media. There is nothing worse than a bias media misleading the people. It is sad most of our media across this country is now owned by a handful of rich and powerful that use it to control our government and divide the people. It is sad that the people from both parties support such propaganda.
 
Yes he is. See below....








No it doesn't. You'd just like it to be so because your arses keep getting burned on the Russian Thingy. It won't go away. The reason is that Russia and Polonium Putin are ever present in the Oval Office.


Most people are lost in the woods on Godwin's Law.

Youse think it's something it isn't.

And it isn't what you think it is. Find out about Godwin's Law Laws. It will save an embarrassment when youse misapply it as most people do. As you're no doubt doing now in your typically erroneous and incomplete knowledge of it and in the general and repeated misunderstanding and misapplication of it.

Godwin's Law Laws.

For instance, after Charlottesville Godwin came forward publicly to say we have the right to tell a Nazi to his face he's a Nazi. Godwin said this is entirely consistent with his own Godwin's Law. Which also means I have the true freedom to tell a Putin-Trump Rower that he's, well, a Putin-Trump Rower. After all, we are what we are whatever we are. I might even ask Godwin about your new Russian Rule thingy.


Row, row, row your boat.....

Newton was not free from the laws of gravity just because he discovered it.
 
Neither party, our government, and especially a few rich people should control our media. There is nothing worse than a bias media misleading the people. It is sad most of our media across this country is now owned by a handful of rich and powerful that use it to control our government and divide the people. It is sad that the people from both parties support such propaganda.

That's quite the pronouncement. Ex cathedra indeed.

Yet I heard the rumble of your thunder in time for me to take cover from the lightning that came right away after.

Voters may have finally learned something over decades of plunking disastrously for so called third party candidates. It's reasonable to say 3rd party candidates in 2020 won't get half the total aggregate vote they got in 2016.

The myth of the wise and savvy 3rd party voter is being hauled in as we speak. Which means the anarchists who are working to try to collapse the system into chaos are butting their heads against the wall. Very few voters are indifferent this time around. The percentage of the two-party vote combined is likely to increase greatly in 2020. So The Destructors are foiled yet again.

Which leaves you rowing around in circles.
 
Newton was not free from the laws of gravity just because he discovered it.

You don't know Godwin's Law.

Learn about it. Because there's no parallel between Newton's Law and Godwin's Law. They're two different beasts.

Save your face before you lose your ass over it in further posting. Right now all we can see of you is your hat floating.
 
You don't know Godwin's Law.

Learn about it. Because there's no parallel between Newton's Law and Godwin's Law. They're two different beasts.

Save your face before you lose your ass over it in further posting. Right now all we can see of you is your hat floating.

I see you have found another thread to flail in.

More repetitious insults and babbling.

Every time Hitler is invoked while talking about people clearly not Hitler is another case of diminishing the very real crimes and horror of what Hitler was....
 
You don't know Godwin's Law.

Learn about it. Because there's no parallel between Newton's Law and Godwin's Law. They're two different beasts.

Save your face before you lose your ass over it in further posting. Right now all we can see of you is your hat floating.

There was no parallel drawn between the laws except the principle which is the writer or founder of such law is not free from the stated law.

Kind of ironic for you to bloviate about saving face...
 
Which not only shows Trump's ignorance of the media in the past, but also shows that he's a massive hypocrite when he goes around making so much stuff up.

News of the past was much more reliable, much less opinionated diatribe and much less biased than it is now... much.
 
News of the past was much more reliable, much less opinionated diatribe and much less biased than it is now... much.

Absolute TRASH.

That you have no idea, that you're probably working based on nostalgia and that people spent far less time criticizing the media, mostly because they didn't get told to do so, is neither here nor there.

When the BBC did fake news | Media | Al Jazeera

Here's a nice piece from al Jazeera about the BBC and its reporting on Iran.

10 Examples of Fake News from History - The Social Historian

The True History of Fake News | by Robert Darnton | NYR Daily | The New York Review of Books

Plenty of evidence out there to show that, in fact, the media in the past was actually far more willing to lie, mostly because they knew it was harder to prove them wrong, and the old adage that bad news travels faster than the truth.

In the modern era with the internet, it's far harder to get away with fake news. That Trump gets away with it, and the media gets criticized every single time, shows that the media is actually being held to a massively high account these days.
 
There was no parallel drawn between the laws except the principle which is the writer or founder of such law is not free from the stated law.

Kind of ironic for you to bloviate about saving face...


Trying to parallel Newton's Law and Godwin's Law is both absurd and it incites doubled over knee slapping howling laughter. Thinking Newton's Law and Godwin's Law are identical or parallel is moron stuff. Neither are the two equal in principle. So nobody pays attention to youse guys after that. I never paid attention to you guys anyway except to shred your nonsense.

Godwin never needed an exemption from his own law, for one thingy. Still doesn't need an exemption, never will need an exemption.

It's classic Trump cultism. That is, you believe and you only dig deeper. Once you go ahead to try to apply Godwin's Law as if it were Newton's Law -- or as being commonly in principle -- you will get your ass handed to you. We're going to have to use a truck and a crane but it's no problem. We'll just drop it behind you so you can sit and reconnect.

So I'm continuing to sharpen my knives so to speak waiting for you to try to apply Godwin's Law as you wrongly believe it to be whether literally or in principle. You will try to apply it one of these dayze, ne c'est pas. Or you guys can just keep on rowing for Putin-Trump as it's all up to youse.
 
Last edited:
where people thought Trump was sending them secret messages on twitter.

You do know that to receive those messages correctly that your tin foil hat must be picking up on the correct frequency, right?
 
Absolute TRASH.

That you have no idea, that you're probably working based on nostalgia and that people spent far less time criticizing the media, mostly because they didn't get told to do so, is neither here nor there.

When the BBC did fake news | Media | Al Jazeera

Here's a nice piece from al Jazeera about the BBC and its reporting on Iran.

10 Examples of Fake News from History - The Social Historian

The True History of Fake News | by Robert Darnton | NYR Daily | The New York Review of Books

Plenty of evidence out there to show that, in fact, the media in the past was actually far more willing to lie, mostly because they knew it was harder to prove them wrong, and the old adage that bad news travels faster than the truth.

In the modern era with the internet, it's far harder to get away with fake news. That Trump gets away with it, and the media gets criticized every single time, shows that the media is actually being held to a massively high account these days.

:lol: uh-huh... 1780's story about the kings health is not the media. And life on the moon and a rumor about Jack the Ripper? Not to mention you didn't even address my point... that is that the media was less opinionated and was more reliable because of that. If you don't see the partisan and hackish reporting then you need to wake up.
 
:lol: uh-huh... 1780's story about the kings health is not the media. And life on the moon and a rumor about Jack the Ripper? Not to mention you didn't even address my point... that is that the media was less opinionated and was more reliable because of that. If you don't see the partisan and hackish reporting then you need to wake up.

Fine, remain ignorant, keep believing things because the truth hurts too much.

I don't care. I showed you some examples I could find quickly. If you had any interest in this subject, you'd go figure it out for yourself. Anyone who KNOWS (rather than believes), knows that the media is held to extremely high account compared to A) the president and B) to the media in the past.
 
The Founding Fathers foresaw people like Trump and for that very reason put in the First Amendment.

He's clearly not a fan of the Constitution at all.

Except it's only the Leftist Democrats who want to limit the free speech of their political opposition.

The President calling out the lies of the Leftist Dinosaur Corporate Media is not curtailing their speech.
 
Fine, remain ignorant, keep believing things because the truth hurts too much.

I don't care. I showed you some examples I could find quickly. If you had any interest in this subject, you'd go figure it out for yourself. Anyone who KNOWS (rather than believes), knows that the media is held to extremely high account compared to A) the president and B) to the media in the past.

Dude, of course the media has lied in the past... "Remember the Maine!" That is not a legitimate counter to this debate and I know a lot about this...

Any person that watches any of the major media outlets and does not recognize all of the opinionated statements that they are making, taken from cherry-picked quotes, statements, facts, images, etc. is a total and complete fool. What the Internet and things do for us now, that they did not do in the past, is allow us to check the facts to the story being reported and more often than not the facts are used to complete a narrative that is biased, subjective and in many cases flat out lying. I don't care if it was happening back in the day... any person that gets caught up in that ****ing stupidity is missing the point that today's media is a ****ing joke. Only people that sift through the reporters agenda and stick to the actual facts are educated in today's Orwellian nightmare of the media.

The Founding Fathers foresaw people like Trump and for that very reason put in the First Amendment. .

I forgot about this gem... :lol:
 
Except it's only the Leftist Democrats who want to limit the free speech of their political opposition.

The President calling out the lies of the Leftist Dinosaur Corporate Media is not curtailing their speech.

What on Earth are you blathering on about?

This is such partisan nonsense, it's not really worth responding to.
 
Dude, of course the media has lied in the past... "Remember the Maine!" That is not a legitimate counter to this debate and I know a lot about this...

Any person that watches any of the major media outlets and does not recognize all of the opinionated statements that they are making, taken from cherry-picked quotes, statements, facts, images, etc. is a total and complete fool. What the Internet and things do for us now, that they did not do in the past, is allow us to check the facts to the story being reported and more often than not the facts are used to complete a narrative that is biased, subjective and in many cases flat out lying. I don't care if it was happening back in the day... any person that gets caught up in that ****ing stupidity is missing the point that today's media is a ****ing joke. Only people that sift through the reporters agenda and stick to the actual facts are educated in today's Orwellian nightmare of the media.



I forgot about this gem... :lol:

I'm not saying the media isn't biased. In fact, it's IMPOSSIBLE not to be biased. I'm also not suggesting that with thousands and thousands of people working in the media, that some of them don't lie to enhance their careers and the like.

What I am saying is that in this modern world, people are far, FAR more likely to be caught out when lying or being utterly biased.

We know the mainstream media takes its battle positions, Fox supporting the Republicans and the other smaller ones mostly supporting the Democrats. Doesn't mean they aren't held to a higher standard than previously when there was no one to call them out on it.
 
It's only Leftist like you who hate the Constitution and Bill of Rights. After all, they are most none Leftist Governing Documents in all human history.

Christ, try getting through sentence without "leftists this and leftists that".

Boring.
 
Christ, try getting through sentence without "leftists this and leftists that".

Boring.

I'm sure you prefer terms like Liberal and Progressive. I try not to use them because like with most branding from the Left they imply the opposite of what they describe.
 
So because a crazy guy thought something it makes someone else responsible for what the crazy guy thought how?

Because there are two crazy guys communicating.

Which places many Americans at risk of crazy guys who use their own means of communication.

Journalism, the 1A and the Constitution being high on the list of the uppermost priority targets.
 
That's quite the pronouncement. Ex cathedra indeed.

Yet I heard the rumble of your thunder in time for me to take cover from the lightning that came right away after.

Voters may have finally learned something over decades of plunking disastrously for so called third party candidates. It's reasonable to say 3rd party candidates in 2020 won't get half the total aggregate vote they got in 2016.

The myth of the wise and savvy 3rd party voter is being hauled in as we speak. Which means the anarchists who are working to try to collapse the system into chaos are butting their heads against the wall. Very few voters are indifferent this time around. The percentage of the two-party vote combined is likely to increase greatly in 2020. So The Destructors are foiled yet again.

Which leaves you rowing around in circles.

I will not be the one who pays. It is our children who will reap what we have sown.
 
Trying to parallel Newton's Law and Godwin's Law is both absurd and it incites doubled over knee slapping howling laughter. Thinking Newton's Law and Godwin's Law are identical or parallel is moron stuff. Neither are the two equal in principle. So nobody pays attention to youse guys after that. I never paid attention to you guys anyway except to shred your nonsense.

Godwin never needed an exemption from his own law, for one thingy. Still doesn't need an exemption, never will need an exemption.

It's classic Trump cultism. That is, you believe and you only dig deeper. Once you go ahead to try to apply Godwin's Law as if it were Newton's Law -- or as being commonly in principle -- you will get your ass handed to you. We're going to have to use a truck and a crane but it's no problem. We'll just drop it behind you so you can sit and reconnect.

So I'm continuing to sharpen my knives so to speak waiting for you to try to apply Godwin's Law as you wrongly believe it to be whether literally or in principle. You will try to apply it one of these dayze, ne c'est pas. Or you guys can just keep on rowing for Putin-Trump as it's all up to youse.

I just explained I wasn’t paralleling the laws. But please, continue with your fabrications. [emoji2369]

Godwin fell to Godwin’s law. How many posts are we on? If you were going to hand my ass to me, you would have tried already. Made some effort or something besides slobbering all over yourself.
 
Back
Top Bottom