Innuendo is implying wrongdoing without specifically saying so. Your article said, 'a lot of people round Biden made a lot of money,' implying that Biden had something to do with it and that it was illicit. The article made no mention of Biden wrongdoing. So, yes, it's innuendo.
Indeed, and what Snopes said about that was
Likewise, the claim that Social Security numbers beginning with 042 are “reserved for Connecticut residents” is false. As explained by the Social Security Administration, the area number portion of a SSN does not (and never did) necessarily correspond to the state in which an applicant was born or resides; it simply reflects the mailing address which the applicant has requested his newly issued card be sent to. That mailing address does not have to be the same as the applicant’s residence address: it can be the address of a friend, relative, employer, rented post office box, or anyone else authorized to receive mail on his behalf:
[SOURCE]
The Area Number is assigned by the geographical region. Prior to 1972, cards were issued in local Social Security offices around the country and the Area Number represented the State in which the card was issued. This did not necessarily have to be the State where the applicant lived, since a person could apply for their card in any Social Security office. Since 1972, when SSA began assigning SSNs and issuing cards centrally from Baltimore, the area number assigned has been based on the ZIP code in the mailing address provided on the application for the original Social Security card. The applicant’s mailing address does not have to be the same as their place of residence. Thus, the Area Number does not necessarily represent the State of residence of the applicant, either prior to 1972 or since..
wasn't it?
That being said, now that the snopes article has confirmed Obama's real SSN for us (it was originally found on a poorly redacted page of his 2009 tax returns and has since become public knowledge) we can run this SSN through any number of federal databases to reveal that it does in fact have two dates of birth associated with it. One DOB is from 1890 and the other is Obama's real birthday:
Any time you have an SSN associated with two dates of birth it's a clear cut sign of identity fraud (except in Obama's case of course as he is above the law)
More background on why older SSN numbers are used in identity fraud:
"The issue traces back to a larger discrepancy the audit found, that 6.5 million Social Security numbers for people born before June 16, 1901 do not have a date of death on record in the administration’s “Numident” system. Without a date of death properly noted in the database, government agencies and other entities inquiring wouldn’t necessarily know an individual was deceased and fraud may occur more easily as a result"
According to SSN Validation, there is none.
Thank you for the good laugh that you provided by inferring that Mr. Trump is somehow someone who is "holding back sin".
Thank you for satisfying my needs. How much do I owe you?