• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump Jr. mocks sexual assault claim against Kavanaugh

His dad is a New Yorker...and?

And he is a douchebag. And when you are trying to make a case for legitimacy, it doesnt pay dividends to be the same kind of douchebag.
 
Where's the mocking? This is nothing but describing the Leftist playbook in such matters.

The allegation is that two men forced her into a room, one watched while the other held her down by force, tried to rip off her clothes, and prevented her from yelling out by covering her mouth.

That's not remotely similar to a note, and the note is mocking her claims. If someone or some ones did that to a daughter or wife, you'd shrug it off? You'd think it's funny? Ha ha?
 
Liberal posters here are about just as unhinged as their senate masters ... ha ha ha
 
Sleazy attempts to smear Kavanaugh with GLARINGLY OBVIOUS BULL**** is the "worst kind of mockery", as it INSULTS all TRUE SEXUAL ASSAULT VICTIMS...

And what are TRUE SEXUAL ASSAULT VICTIMS to you...women that run right down to the police station to report the offense? Typical...utterly oblivious to what actually happens to sexual assault victims male and female. Don't see many young men running right down to the police station to report that their Priest bent them over a desk now do we!
 
Liberal posters here are about just as unhinged as their senate masters ... ha ha ha


hahaha....hahahaha. A really mature response. Beginning to wonder if Trump voters can prove they are actually of voting age.
 
I for one I'm totally glad it upsets you and yours. Trump in your heeeeeaaaddd.

He's not in my head. But you might be on the end of his pole.
 
The allegation is that two men forced her into a room, one watched while the other held her down by force, tried to rip off her clothes, and prevented her from yelling out by covering her mouth.

That's not remotely similar to a note, and the note is mocking her claims. If someone or some ones did that to a daughter or wife, you'd shrug it off? You'd think it's funny? Ha ha?

Even the friend who supposedly stopped it from occurring says it didn't happen. His girlfriend at the time says there's no way. No police report, nothing but her anti-Trump activism.
 
Even the friend who supposedly stopped it from occurring says it didn't happen. His girlfriend at the time says there's no way. No police report, nothing but her anti-Trump activism.

And the rational for such activism in 2012 which was recorded by her therapist?

Brett and his buddy don't have incentive to lie? What is her incentive? She is setting herself up for a gauntlet with no real reward. Brett is trying to get to lifetime tenure on the SC.
 
And the rational for such activism in 2012 which was recorded by her therapist?

Brett and his buddy don't have incentive to lie? What is her incentive? She is setting herself up for a gauntlet with no real reward. Brett is trying to get to lifetime tenure on the SC.

If the cops had arrested him for something at the time, he would have been punished and his records sealed. She can't seem to remember when this traumatic event occurred.
 
If the cops had arrested him for something at the time, he would have been punished and his records sealed. She can't seem to remember when this traumatic event occurred.

Lets just bring her before the Committee which will be no bed of roses for her and bring him back before the committee and see what we can see.

She didn't report it at the time which is actually the norm even today in 2018. My God men are cement heads. Makes me check my own on occasion just to make sure there is actual blood flowing up there since I should be vulnerable to male pattern cementheadedness as well.
 
If the cops had arrested him for something at the time, he would have been punished and his records sealed. She can't seem to remember when this traumatic event occurred.


That is really the most hilarious part of the accusation: she doesn't remember when it happened, doesn't remember where it happened and doesn't remember how she got there ... :lamo
 
That is really the most hilarious part of the accusation: she doesn't remember when it happened, doesn't remember where it happened and doesn't remember how she got there ... :lamo

You don't seem to understand trauma much. Hatch and Grassley don't either, nor any of their cement headed GOP mates on the Hill.
 
For decades the so called family values CONSERVATIVE religious right preached to this country about morals and family values. They were outraged Bill got a BJ. Now 80% of those same 'family values' Conservatives have voted for, excused and daily defend the unchristian non family values, white trash elitist family that is now in the White House.

Of all the hypocritical Trumpsters, the evangelical religious right is by far the worse.
 
And the rational for such activism in 2012 which was recorded by her therapist?

Brett and his buddy don't have incentive to lie? What is her incentive? She is setting herself up for a gauntlet with no real reward. Brett is trying to get to lifetime tenure on the SC.

She could well become a liberal (resist, resist, resist?) and campus hero by single-handedly stopping Trump's SCOTUS appointment from being approved. Talk show, campus speaking and book deal offers would surely flow to her. Where, exactly, was that "gauntlet" by accusing a HS kid (from anther school) at the time of the alleged crime(s)? Surely she was not alone at that party and would have had ample witnesses to at least her and his presence at the alleged 'crime scene'. This smells heavily of partisan bias.
 
Even the friend who supposedly stopped it from occurring says it didn't happen. His girlfriend at the time says there's no way. No police report, nothing but her anti-Trump activism.

The friend who was an admitted alcoholic at the time backs up his friend that the two didn't engage in drunken attempted sexual assault? And his girlfriend who was not there says it didn't happen! Those are shocking claims!

But the point is you can believe her or not - I know you don't - but it's not a trivial matter, and Don Jr. mocks the claim as silly. So I'm assuming if this happened to someone in your family, you'd not be laughing ha ha about it, right?
 
My favorite is still Rudy Giuliani.

Guy studies to be a priest. Becomes mayor and physically and illegally removes the poor from the streets of Manhattan and sends them to a camp upstate. He does this while at the same time he is banging his girlfriend in the house his wife and son live in.

A fine Christian man. Like most good Christians.

Bigot much?
 
She could well become a liberal (resist, resist, resist?) and campus hero by single-handedly stopping Trump's SCOTUS appointment from being approved. Talk show, campus speaking and book deal offers would surely flow to her. Where, exactly, was that "gauntlet" by accusing a HS kid (from anther school) at the time of the alleged crime(s)? Surely she was not alone at that party and would have had ample witnesses to at least her and his presence at the alleged 'crime scene'. This smells heavily of partisan bias.



She "can't remember" when it was, or whose house it was at.

Total madeup, nonsense about a game of "Truth or Dare".
 
The friend who was an admitted alcoholic at the time backs up his friend that the two didn't engage in drunken attempted sexual assault? And his girlfriend who was not there says it didn't happen! Those are shocking claims!

But the point is you can believe her or not - I know you don't - but it's not a trivial matter, and Don Jr. mocks the claim as silly. So I'm assuming if this happened to someone in your family, you'd not be laughing ha ha about it, right?


If the "someone in my family" made it up decades later, as this DEMOCRAT OPERATIVE just did, no, I wouldn't be laughing. I'd be EMBARRASED...
 
She could well become a liberal (resist, resist, resist?) and campus hero by single-handedly stopping Trump's SCOTUS appointment from being approved. Talk show, campus speaking and book deal offers would surely flow to her. Where, exactly, was that "gauntlet" by accusing a HS kid (from anther school) at the time of the alleged crime(s)? Surely she was not alone at that party and would have had ample witnesses to at least her and his presence at the alleged 'crime scene'. This smells heavily of partisan bias.

Had that all planned out in 2012 did she? She didn't want to be exposed at all which is why Feinstein was caught between a rock and a hard place. Ford was outed which is what prompted her to agree to testify. Staggering how often people will revert to blaming the potential victim.
 
Had that all planned out in 2012 did she? She didn't want to be exposed at all which is why Feinstein was caught between a rock and a hard place. Ford was outed which is what prompted her to agree to testify. Staggering how often people will revert to blaming the potential victim.

Are you kidding me? Are you seriously asserting that she thought an anonymous allegation of a barely defined crime (date, time and place 'not remembered') turned over to a non-LEO, no less, would be enough to git-r-done?

She was (and still is) seeking political attention and had (and still has) no intention of pursuing a criminal or civil charge.

That was like tossing raw meat into a lion's cage an claiming that you never thought that the lion would ever eat it.
 
Last edited:
Are you kidding me? Are you seriously asserting that she thought an anonymous allegation of a barely defined crime (date, time and place 'not remembered') turned over to a non-LEO, no less, would be enough to git-r-done?

She was (and still is) seeking political attention and had (and still has) no intention of pursuing a criminal or civil charge.

That was like tossing raw meat into a lion's cage an claiming that you never thought that the lion would ever eat it.

She can't pursue a legal remedy. Maryland statute of limitations.

I don't think she believed anything would get-r-done.

- She told Feinstein at the point of submitting here letter that she did not think it would make a difference in and of itself to the Senate Supreme Court vote
- Ford was outed or else we would not be here at all
- Ford was outed AND she felt she was being misrepresented by the news reporting and decided she now had justification for telling her story in her own words, in fact had to tell her story in her own words in the venue that would be most effective. If the lunatic fringe media had not gone nuts to find her and then apparently fabricate part of her actual story, she might have been much less inclined to come forward.

You have no clue apparently what actually happens to and then motivates people that have suffered a sexual assault. None of us actually know what they go through. What you can say with some degree of certainty is that whether its a male assaulted by a Priest or a 15 year old female assaulted by a drunken 17 year old, who happened to be popular and high profile in the social strata of Maryland, the response by the victim will be very similar to what we are seeing from Ford.

Senate Judiciary is going to have no choice but to reopen the hearings. She will testify. He will testify. Will say this much...if he gives more of the same marble mouth answers he gave to questions not nearly so relevant, he is going nowhere.

Kavanaugh has already stumbled once claiming that "he was not even at the party". Well which party was that Brett. If she is actually having difficulty remembering the location and date of the party, how can you say you were not there JUDGE!!!!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom