Trump is going to cheat. An article worth reading.

[Diesel]

Your honesty is both horrifying and appreciated; incorrect.

I can't believe these rich Republicans don't sue someone to restore their First Amendment rights. Surely a court wants Americans to enjoy free speech.

 

[bubbabgone]

It's funny you are anticipating a Democratic loss, especially since most everyone was anticipating a Trump loss in 2016 and he won. I wonder what excuses the Republicans will come up with if they lose i 2020. Its also funny how things have a way to come around 360 degrees and the ones on the likely winning side are saying the exact same things than the people on the other side were saying in 2016. It is irony, for sure.

Wouldn't you mean 180°?
360° would mean the same side would win again.
Wouldn't it?

 

[trixare4kids]

:2mad: x Infinity = ???

heads exploding emoji??? :blowup:

 

[Luckyone]

Very astute observation.

What will happen if Trump is reelected? :tocktock2

 

[Ikari]

Leftists don't have a candidate worth a crap, so obviously DJT is cheating.

:2rofll:

I don't think the Democrats not having a good has any bearing on the fact that DJT is a liar and a cheat.

 

[trixare4kids]

View attachment 67274360

You're seriously going to blame a nuclear war on Trump as the result of his reelection?
And Trump's the sociopath?

 

[Hypothetical]

This response is logical fallacy known as an ad hominem.

that's funny because that is exactly what the article is against Trump.

also known as a hit piece.

 

[Luckyone]

You're seriously going to blame a nuclear war on Trump as the result of his reelection?
And Trump's the sociopath?

That is a death cloud and not necessarily a nuclear cloud. Then again, both might come true.

 

[Decypher]

It's bad advice.
She'd behoove herself is she showed some honesty and simply said, Trump has done a marvelous job with the economy and the Democrats are again, running someone un-electable against him.

Bit strange that you dismiss the article as biased and then say the author should instead have written something that confirms your biases.

 

[3leftsdoo]

You're seriously going to blame a nuclear war on Trump as the result of his reelection?
And Trump's the sociopath?

Are you sure that's a mere nuclear war?

I think the message is:

Trump = LITERALLY The End of Times

:donkeyfla

 

[trixare4kids]

Bit strange that you dismiss the article as biased and then say the author should instead have written something that confirms your biases.

That's not what I wrote.
I dismiss her article because it's nonsense.

 

[trixare4kids]

Are you sure that's a mere nuclear war?

I think the message is:

Trump = LITERALLY The End of Times

:donkeyfla

Luckyone's wishful thinking meme since he is the one who sees the future should Trump be reelected. :screwy
Trump reelection = nuclear war/end times :alert

 

[3leftsdoo]

That's not what I wrote.
I dismiss her article because it's nonsense.

Trump = LITERALLY planning to cheat in the imaginations of liberals everywhere

And YOU don't take it seriously???

:spank:

 

[Decypher]

That's not what I wrote.
I dismiss her article because it's nonsense.

That’s not how I remember it.

In your own words, why is a biased, liberally slanted opinion piece authored by a former Obama speechwriter worth reading? :coffeepap

 

[Decypher]

Trump = LITERALLY planning to cheat in the imaginations of liberals everywhere

And YOU don't take it seriously???

:spank:

Personally I didn’t read the article. Cheating is rife in US elections, I doubt 2020 will be any different. No I was more interested in people dismissing an article because of potential bias and then displaying their own biases for all to see.

 

[JMR]

What delicious irony... ^^^

Trump won the election, and his voters think differently than the misfits who claim all his roads lead to Putin even after the taxpayers funded a special investigation, and Trump supporters and voters are living in the echo chamber? :lamo

You prove my point.

 

[trixare4kids]

You prove my point.

Where's your point?
:argue

 

[JMR]

Where's your point?
:argue

You believe all who don't support Trump are misfits (your words) and have nothing of value to say. You claim that the investigation vindicated the actions of Trump, which is only the Barr version. Why don't you just admit you prefer the alternative fact version of the news?