Trump has his Mitt Romney "47%" moment (1 Viewer)

[Puigb]

lmao, you got to love how history repeats itself.

Trump is no different than any GOP "establishment" politician. Just another wealthy hack who says one thing in front of the camera, and another behind closed doors. The same people who are still crying about Hillary's "deplorables" comment are the same ones who will cheer this on.

 

[Opossum]

lmao, you got to love how history repeats itself.

Trump is no different than any GOP "establishment" politician. Just another wealthy hack who says one thing in front of the camera, and another behind closed doors. The same people who are still crying about Hillary's "deplorables" comment are the same ones who will cheer this on.

You didn't do anything to refute the comments. Why?

 

[Phys251]

You didn't do anything to refute the comments. Why?

You didn't do anything to refute the OP. Why?

 

[Opossum]

You didn't do anything to refute the OP. Why?

There is nothing to refute in the OP. There are many groups that give Dems built in support, so I mostly agree with the statement. I don't think welfare recipients are as in the tank for Dems as the other two groups though.

 

[Phys251]

There is nothing to refute in the OP.

No, you just don't want to address it.

There are many groups that give Dems built in support, so I mostly agree with the statement. I don't think welfare recipients are as in the tank for Dems as the other two groups though.

 

[Hamish Howl]

You didn't do anything to refute the comments. Why?

He was too busy jesting about what's going on in the courts.

 

[Nickyjo]

Don’t both dems and GOP always start out (nationally) with 40% and fight over the remaining 20%?

 

[Phys251]

He was too busy jesting about what's going on in the courts.

 

[Hamish Howl]

 

[Puigb]

You didn't do anything to refute the comments. Why?

Trump gave no evidence to back up his comments. Why?

 

[Puigb]

There is nothing to refute in the OP. There are many groups that give Dems built in support, so I mostly agree with the statement. I don't think welfare recipients are as in the tank for Dems as the other two groups though.

So? The GOP has a built in white support of anywhere between 56%-60% in every election cycle, by far the largest share of voters out there, and also the highest propensity voters as well.

And despite that massive advantage in their favor, they still suck at winning elections, lol.

 

[bongsaway]

The folks on the right have a desperate need to complain, about everything.

 

[Simpletruther]

So? The GOP has a built in white support of anywhere between 56%-60% in every election cycle, by far the largest share of voters out there, and also the highest propensity voters as well.

And despite that massive advantage in their favor, they still suck at winning elections, lol.

So what's the big deal?

 

[ldub23]

Trump makes alot of sense on this.

 

[Blue Dog]

There is no comparing Romney to Trump.

The former was vulnerable to the old rules when someone said something opprobrious, it would come back to bite them in the campaign. The latter doubles down and feeds off those same type of comments….

 

[Allan]

You didn't do anything to refute the OP. Why?

Oh I know!

 

[samiam5211]

It is funny that we still think Trump can say something that hurts his political support.

 

[Puigb]

There is no comparing Romney to Trump.

The former was vulnerable to the old rules when someone said something opprobrious, it would come back to bite them in the campaign. The latter doubles down and feeds off those same type of comments….

I agree that Trump can say whatever he wants and get away with it, but the comparison is yet again another white GOP politician/businessman claiming (without evidence) that all these democratic voters are only voting a certain way entirely because of "welfare", something he or Romney have zero evidence of.

And of course they both did it in private to a bunch of other wealthy GOP donors.