Trump campaign manager calls impeachment inquiry a 'seditious conspiracy'

[Atomic Kid]

So in the 150 year history of impeachments. All impeachments had the following in common.
1. There was a Bipartisan vote to start impeachment inquiry
2. The President had a right to be present or have legal representation present.
3. The President had the right to present evidence.
4. The hearing were help in the public's view.
5. The minority party had subpoena power.

Trumps inquiry

1 No Bipartisan vote to start the inquiry.
2. The President does not have the right to be present or have legal representation present.
3. The President had the right to present evidence.
4. The hearing is being help in secrecy away from the public's eye.
5. The minority party does not have subpoena power

This goes against precedence and is against our country's tradition of due process and should alarm every fair minded American.

Just remember some day there will be a Democrat President and a Republican House would you want them to follow this new precedence?

You just compared apples to oranges. Impeachment inquiries are not equal to impeachment. Try again.

 

[Deuce]

You don't get it. It's not about impeaching Trump or they would've taken a vote already and made it official. This is a clown show they're calling an impeachment inquiry which has to be conducted behind closed doors of the intelligence committee. The Gestapo would be proud.

No, an honest impeachment process requires investigation to finish first. "Vote guilty, then investigate" is how fascists work. Agree?

 

[MauiMan]

Trump campaign manager calls impeachment inquiry a 'seditious conspiracy' | TheHill

Trump campaign manager calls impeachment inquiry a 'seditious conspiracy'

President Trump's 2020 campaign manager Brad Parscale on Monday called the impeachment inquiry from House Democrats a "seditious conspiracy" to overthrow the president.

"Nancy Pelosi should step down for betraying her oath of office and attempting to overthrow our great Republic," Parscale said, referring to the Speaker and California Democrat.
===========================================
I think this political hack, like Trump, should read the Constitution before popping off like this. But it is apparent from the huge number of Internet ads & guys like this that the impeachment probe is hurting Trump's chances for reelection.

Of course he’s going to call it a "seditious conspiracy"! What other position can he take? —"Yep, Trump abused power and should be impeached"?

The case here is “open and shut”. Trump either did it or he didn’t. The phone call sure sounds like a shake down to me. But, the investigation needs to show the supporting evidence that confirms it.

If Trump did indeed to this, it is particularly egregious, because he had just gone through two years of a special probe on whether or not he colluded with Russia to interfere in the 2016 election. And, now, the very day after Mueller’s public comments, Trump coerces a foreign leader to help him in the 2020 election! Terrible.

 

[lemmiwinx]

No, an honest impeachment process requires investigation to finish first. "Vote guilty, then investigate" is how fascists work. Agree?

You must be having fun with me. If Pencil Neck and the Botox Queen were really serious there would be hearings going on in the light of day on CNN and MSDNC 24/7. No there's only ghostly accusers with nefarious connections to the CIA meeting behind closed doors. It's not as easy to depose a duly elected president as they thought.

 

[Deuce]

You must be having fun with me. If Pencil Neck and the Botox Queen were really serious there would be hearings going on in the light of day on CNN and MSDNC 24/7. No there's only ghostly accusers with nefarious connections to the CIA meeting behind closed doors. It's not as easy to depose a duly elected president as they thought.

So now you're admitting that the "should have voted already" part is nonsense? Weird how you come up with a different standard every time you get disproven. An then the childish namecalling, not exactly selling yourself as a man just looking for the honest truth here.

So now you're pretending to want transparency. So, if they get Trump's tax returns you want that shown to all the world too?

 

[lemmiwinx]

So now you're admitting that the "should have voted already" part is nonsense? Weird how you come up with a different standard every time you get disproven. An then the childish namecalling, not exactly selling yourself as a man just looking for the honest truth here.

So now you're pretending to want transparency. So, if they get Trump's tax returns you want that shown to all the world too?

Hope for your sake you're not expecting this new scheme to get rid of Trump is going to turn out any better than the Mueller investigation. I'm afraid it might be too much for you. Nancy and Schiff aren't exactly the types I'd put my trust in.

 

[Deuce]

Hope for your sake you're not expecting this new scheme to get rid of Trump is going to turn out any better than the Mueller investigation. I'm afraid it might be too much for you. Nancy and Schiff aren't exactly the types I'd put my trust in.

There is no amount of evidence of Trump's crimes that would get the Republican-controlled senate to vote to convict. They're trapped by their own rabid voting base, who would literally riot in the streets if Trump got removed. If there's one good thing Trump has accomplished, he has successfully highlighted that our system of checks and balances is not nearly as strong as we thought it was. 34 senators in your pocket makes you above the law. Trump is a felon, and he's going to stay in the white house until January 2021.