• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump battles with Democrats as impeachment pressure grows

For beating Hillary Clinton in the election.

Time to find a new talking point, that's old.

giphy.gif
 
To be found either innocent or guilty one has to rely on the substance of evidence gathered. Trump is stonewalling the process of the multiple Congressional investigations. If he could so easily be exonerated, then why would he order people not to answer subpoenas or to hand over requested documents? Proof is always in the pudding and in the evidence, that's why he wants none of it to come to Congress.

Trump knows that McGahn will have to tell them things under oath that Trump does not want put out there. Which is precisely the reason why Trump directed him to ignore the subpoena.
 
It's no more insane than what the Democrats have been doing for the last 2 years. This is just a continuatuon of a two year long tantrum
They're so invested in the phony Collision obstruction narrative they have to keep it going at all cost

That means manipulating and stringing their supporters along with threats of impeachment

Hey, if you can support your conspiracy theory with any facts, have at it.
 
Get on with your impeachment so we can move to the next conundrum. Hurry now!
 
The following is from Mueller's report....

" The investigation did not establish any agreement among [Trump] Campaign officials--or b/t such officials & Russia-linked individuals--to interfere with or obstruct a lawful function of a gov't agency during the campaign or transition."

So no obstruction, so what should he be impeached with ? Don't you guys realize when your own party is stringing you along ?

Mueller report lists 10 instances trump obstructed justice and mueller was accurate to report that it did not exonerate trump of obstruction.
 
From Mueller's report.....

"The investigation did not establish any agreement among [Trump] Campaign officials--or b/t such officials & Russia-linked individuals--to interfere w or obstruct a lawful function of a gov't agency during the campaign or transition."

And I get they want to impeach him, but so what ? If they're foolish enough to attempt it then more power to them
They could have voted to impeach the day Mueller's report was released, but they didn't. They would rather string along and manipulate their supporters with threats


So you agree the Mueller report outlined dozens of examples of high crimes and misdemeanors.

I know it's hard to admit but the evidence is SOOOOO obvious...
 
Yes. Actually. Because it was done under false pretenses. It should not have happened. This is pure political revenge because Trump won the Presidency and the dumb democrats have been having a seismic temper tantrum since then. This country will never recover.

It is kind of odd considering the previous administration was aware of Russian interference as early as 2014. Curious why there was no special counsel appointed earlier.
 
It is kind of odd considering the previous administration was aware of Russian interference as early as 2014. Curious why there was no special counsel appointed earlier.


Obama was President. Comey head of the FBI. It is curious isn’t it?
 
It is kind of odd considering the previous administration was aware of Russian interference as early as 2014. Curious why there was no special counsel appointed earlier.


Obama was President. Comey head of the FBI. It is curious isn’t it?
 
Trumps whole leadership strategy is about finding ways to blame everything on the Democrats. For two years his party controlled Congress and the only thing they accomplished was a tax reform bill. As soon as the Democrats took the house the border sitution suddenly became a 'national emergency' and Trump started in demanding the Democrats build his wall. Now every damned illegal immigrant is the fault of the Democrats in Congress. This latest is just another way to blame the Democrats for Trump doing diddly-squat.

*For two years his party controlled Congress *

It takes 60 votes to control the Senate, so no the Rebubs didn't control Congress
 
So you agree the Mueller report outlined dozens of examples of high crimes and misdemeanors.

I know it's hard to admit but the evidence is SOOOOO obvious...

and Pelosi isn’t running to IMPEACH.....what’s wrong with her?
 
That would be the one:

"I'm not going to try to get into the mind of Donald Trump because I don't think there's a whole lot of space there. I think he's a kook. I think he's crazy. I think he's unfit for office."
2/17/2016

I agree with your assessment, however I do have issue with the space in trumps head.

For some reason I picture it as walking across the lava crust in the crater of a semi dormant volcano, no air, no flow, just dormancy....
 
It is kind of odd considering the previous administration was aware of Russian interference as early as 2014. Curious why there was no special counsel appointed earlier.

What would a special counselor investigate in 2014? The administration, like most western countries, received the report that the Kremlin was building a disinformation arm that could be used to interfere in Western democracies, which apparently was shared by Russian sources with the Americans in Moscow. Why would that require a special counsel? Special counsels are appointed to investigate matters where a potential conflict of interest exists with the normal prosecuting authority. What was the conflict of interest in 2014 that would prohibit the normal government agencies from investigating that report?
 
I agree with your assessment, however I do have issue with the space in trumps head.

For some reason I picture it as walking across the lava crust in the crater of a semi dormant volcano, no air, no flow, just dormancy....


That wasn't my assessment. That was Lindsey Graham's before he decided that fellating Trump was more important than going down in history as a statesman.
 
That wasn't my assessment. That was Lindsey Graham's before he decided that fellating Trump was more important than going down in history as a statesman.

The thing I miss most about John McCain is Lindsey Graham's brain, which is buried beside McCain in his coffin.
 
But he didn't obstruct justice. From the Mueller report....


"The investigation did not establish any agreement among [Trump] Campaign officials--or b/t such officials & Russia-linked individuals--to interfere w or obstruct a lawful function of a gov't agency during the campaign or transition."

The report as I understood it found at least 10 instances of obstruction, whether there was an 'agreement' or not. The president's own actions likely constitute obstruction and he's still doing it. That's the evidence so for an it's more than enough to start impeachment proceedings. If it's PwoofTM you're looking for, one way or another an impeachment will sort that out. So let's air it all out I say.
 
How is Trump " shutting down this Nation ", and what exactly have the Democrats done to make life better for your average American ?
They've chosen to tantrum instead of Govern and have no intention of working with Trump on policy

Well first of all one of trumps campaign promise's was to repair our crumbling nation wide infrastructure.

He just told the nation he will continue to let it crumble unless investigations into his criminal activities are dropped.

He made that very ****ing clear and there is no way to spin that...

Democrats have passed dozens of bills that McConnell will not bring up. The Republicans are in control, and yet all they can do is obstruct...
 
Thats not why. Perhaps you could actually read the report yourself.

That would eliminate his plausible deniability, cultists love to cherry pick and never actually read all available information...
 
Basically we have the Clinton Impeachment all over again. President Clinton was impeached by the house on one count of perjury and one count of obstruction of justice, two other impeachment articles – a second perjury charge and a charge of abuse of power – failed in the House.
Pretty much the same charges in the same house where Dems now want to charge President Trump. In both cases in the senate, impeachment did not nor will not pass. A 2/3 majority is required. Bottom line, like Clinton, President Trump will remain president and is highly likely to also be re-elected. This is all political theater and if history is any indicator will bode badly for the dems just as it did for the GOP all those years ago. If you're going to impeach do so, other than a footnote in the annals of history, it is irreverent and changes nothing.
 
It takes 60 votes to control the Senate, so no the Rebubs didn't control Congress
How does the Senate determine which party gets to pick committee chairs etc. when neither party has 60 members in the Senate?

Or are you using some version of the word "control" which does not apply to setting the Senate's agenda etc?
 
If having over 30 convictions doesn't tell you different - then sorry you can't see the trees for the woods.
Stay misinformed - it's working for you.


Who was convicted of collusion. Inform me.
 
Article I charged that Clinton lied to the grand jury concerning:[21]

the nature and details of his relationship with Lewinsky
prior false statements he made in the Jones deposition
prior false statements he allowed his lawyer to make characterizing Lewinsky's affidavit
his attempts to tamper with witnesses
Article III charged Clinton with attempting to obstruct justice in the Jones case by:[22]

encouraging Lewinsky to file a false affidavit
encouraging Lewinsky to give false testimony if and when she was called to testify
concealing gifts he had given to Lewinsky that had been subpoenaed
attempting to secure a job for Lewinsky to influence her testimony
permitting his lawyer to make false statements characterizing Lewinsky's affidavit
attempting to tamper with the possible testimony of his secretary Betty Curie
making false and misleading statements to potential grand jury witnesses

Sound familiar?
 
The presumption of innocence is still the legal principle that one is considered innocent unless proven guilty.
This applies to Trump and anyone else you don't like

Mueller could not exonerate Trump because to be exonerated you first have to be found guilty

Trump didn't obstruct justice, and the Democrats are playing their supporters like a cheap banjo.

Only when the one being investigated is a Republican. If it's a democrat - you guys would be applauding. It would be refreshing if you'd just own your hypocrisy.


Here's a little ditty for you.

Translate Trump


More Translate Trump Retweeted Donald J. Trump
🎶 If you’re guilty and you know it, tweet some more; 🎶

🎶 If you’re guilty and you know it, tweet some more; 🎶

🎶 If you’re guilty and you know it, then your tweets will surely show it; 🎶

🎶 If you’re guilty and you know it, tweet so
 
Back
Top Bottom