Did you read it? Starting on page 7 she says basically what I said in the post you pompously criticized.
You are about a week or two behind on your RNC talking points buddy. The bottom line is you don't know as much as you think you do.
I tried to point out to you that your point didn't matter. I guess I have to hold your hand and point things out to you step by step. It was Trump's people who were spreading the rumors and lies, to begin with. Parnas, Fruman, and Rudy were the ones smearing Yovanovitch! And Rudy himself admitted to it:
Trump Ordered Ukraine Ambassador Removed After Complaints From Giuliani, Others - WSJ
In an interview, Mr. Giuiliani told the Wall Street Journal that in the lead-up to Ms. Yovanovitch's removal, he reminded the president of complaints percolating among Trump supporters that she had displayed an anti-Trump bias in private conversations
There is nothing in Yovanovitch's testimony that contradicts what we know about Parnas, Fruman, and Rudy, and their attempts to smear Yovanovitch. FYI, WSJ is owned by Murdoch, by the way, so no more of this "MSNBC CT" nonsense you keep ranting about.
He wont be impeached because he didnt commit an impeachable offense.
Yeah, he totally did, and there is definitely something wrong with you and all other Trump supporters for not being able to admit it.
And its not a matter of convincing 20 senators, its convincing the 90% of republicans who support Trump.
The polls keep trending in the wrong direction for Trump.
And you focus on 90% of Republicans who support Trump but forget the huge portion of the population that doesn't identify as Republican, which is about 65% to 70% of the U.S. population.
The attempt on the part of Jim Jordan type Republicans to play to the rabidly pro-Trump base is just going to ruin the Republican Party's prospects in the long term.
Thats not going to happen and im going to tell you why.
You're right. I think Trump supporters generally fall into two camps: they are either too ignorant to know the difference between right and wrong, or they just don't care.
You guys shot your wad with the Mueller report and you blew it
Well, no, that's not true. First of all, Mueller had an obligation to investigate, not an obligation to uncover a crime. Investigations are about finding the truth of a thing. It's a process. It's not a search for an outcome.
Also, while the crime of conspiracy was not found beyond a reasonable doubt, that doesn't mean Trump did nothing wrong. Trump still sought to coordinate with the Russian government. For instance, the section about Peter Smith in the Mueller report is especially damning.
Also, I hate to remind you that Mueller outlined 4 clear instances of obstruction. In that respect, with regard to obstruction, the problem wasn't that Mueller "failed", it's that Republicans don't care if Republican Presidents obstruct justice because of Jesus or something.
No one on the right trusts or believes a thing you say.
I think that's true, but that reflects poorly on them, not Trump critics, or the media. The mainstream media almost always gets things right. When they make a mistake they admit it.
Thats not going to change. So you will never get the support of the senate.
I think most Trump supporters don't care that Trump is a crook, but the Senators will care about their legacy, and they also are accountable to ALL voters in their state, not just Republican voters, and they will ultimately do the right thing for the Republic, even if Trump supporters don't care about the U.S. Constitution and the future of the Republic.
You were promised an impeachment once before and you fell for it. Use your head this time
Nobody promised anything. There was a lot of rumor and innuendo, for sure, but this was because Trump did things that generated speculation, whether it was firing Comey or lying about the Trump Tower meeting, or what he has been doing over the past several months which has been to obstruct every bit of evidence, every document, eyewitnesses, and so on.