Tomi Lahren Assaulted at Minneapolis Restaurant, Trump tweets support

[TurtleDude]

I do not like the Clintons either, so tell that line to someone who cares enough to defend them. Also I do not care talking heads at CNN, I think US main stream media is ratings driven infotainment garbage, I listen to more independent media. I live in Canada and I think our news media is superior to yours.

I am not jealous of her because produces nothing of value and I think she is a product of a shallow infotainment system. She has no real skills, you fire her and replace her with someone with the same view points and it would not change a thing, I think that makes her worthless as a media figure. She is infotainment over journalism and I hate Infotainment.

You seem to want a media system that rewards partisan hackery rather then commitiment to investigative journalism and presenting real facts.

if her employers find she adds value, then who are you to whine? its not like you are being taxed to support her views. Most of the main stream media is rewarding partisan hackery-started back in the 60s or earlier. "Rather biased" comes to mind.

you seem to have issues with private organizations paying people you don't like

guess what? I couldn't care less

 

[Lord of Planar]

Anyone who fear-mongers immigration the way she does is a jackass.



1:00 mark

A lot of delusions about immigration designed to rile people up. "A lot of these folks coming in are un-skilled and uneducated."

Well, a lot of these folks that are coming in are skilled and educated too, so what does that do to her blanket, ignorant statement? Turns it on its face.

https://www.usnews.com/news/nationa...en-it-comes-to-education-with-a-big-exception

There is no "immigration crisis", there is no "people pouring in."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-the-us-than-arriving/?utm_term=.ec85c29c53af



Since the numbers don't match the rhetoric, it makes me think she is playing people's emotions and scapegoating immigrants who are by and large, an asset to society.

I'm sorry, please elaborate as to what was wrong about her saying we can't take in everyone that wants to come here? And... according to ypoiur posted chart, Mexico does have the lowest education level of first generation immigrants. Again, how is she wrong?

And if you believe the facts of the WaPo as being meaningful saying it's not a problem, I will claim the statistics show our harsher viewpoint on illegal immigration is the cause of the decrease.

Why isn't it zero yet? I want illegal immigration to be zero. There are legal routes available for nearly all countries, and quotas for very sound reasons.

 

[Lord of Planar]

There is no legal obligation for me to feel sorry for her, she is one of those conservative provocateurs, she wants to provoke reactions in others, so she got what she wanted.

She can press charges if she wants, but a wing nut welfare recipient like her getting water splashed in her face is hardly one of the great injustices of the world, IMO.

You might be right on that account, to some extent.

I wonder how many thousands more dollars she will make this year off the actions of brain-dead hateful liberals?

Ann Coulter makes millions each year by making the angry left more angry. Tomi does the same thing. I'm pretty sure she knows what she is doing, and playing the game like a chessmaster.

 

[Lord of Planar]

You do realize that most of our media today is controlled not by liberals, but by conservatives.

Conservatives that laugh all the way to the bank of what their liberal bias shows brings them.

 

[Yes_Minister]

if her employers find she adds value, then who are you to whine? its not like you are being taxed to support her views. Most of the main stream media is rewarding partisan hackery-started back in the 60s or earlier. "Rather biased" comes to mind.

you seem to have issues with private organizations paying people you don't like

guess what? I couldn't care less

Conservatives keep complaining about the "liberal media", yet want a media system that rewards talentless hacks like Lahern. Conservatives complain about private news outfits like CNN, turn about is fair play I am using your own media critcism logic against you.

Besides I listen to Canadian and independent media more then main stream US media, I am unhappy when the US media helps produce bad policy, like all the media outfits being in the tank for the Iraq War. Lahern cares more about being a infotainer and provocateurs rather then presenting real news, which makes her worthy of contempt.

You do not care, because you do not have real standards and want to reward ideological purity over talent, which is what wingnut welfare is all about.

 

[TurtleDude]

Conservatives keep complaining about the "liberal media", yet want a media system that rewards talentless hacks like Lahern. Conservatives complain about private news outfits like CNN, turn about is fair play I am using your own media critcism logic against you.

Besides I listen to Canadian and independent media more then main stream US media, I am unhappy when the US media helps produce bad policy, like all the media outfits being in the tank for the Iraq War. Lahern cares more about being a infotainer and provocateurs rather then presenting real news, which makes her worthy of contempt.

You do not care, because you do not have real standards and want to reward ideological purity over talent, which is what wingnut welfare is all about.

given how wrong you constantly are, your depiction of TL's "talent" is your biased opinion. The good news, is you don't have to patronize her show and since you are not forced to spend any money on her, your stupid rant appears to be nothing more than a bit of butt hurt that someone you don't agree with is making money from uttering opinions that upset your sensibilities. BFD. And I couldn't care less that you claim your standards should matter to me.

 

[Yes_Minister]

You might be right on that account, to some extent.

I wonder how many thousands more dollars she will make this year off the actions of brain-dead hateful liberals?

Ann Coulter makes millions each year by making the angry left more angry. Tomi does the same thing. I'm pretty sure she knows what she is doing, and playing the game like a chessmaster.

That's these people like Lahern do not my respect or sympathy, they care about making a buck and often just say these things. She is a chess master for making money off a system I have no respect for? That's like taking candy from a baby.

I think society would be bettet Lahern and Coulter were working in fast food, but clearly some rubes will reward them for ideological purity and thus a fool and their money are soon parted. Lahern and Coulter do not have to work a day in their lives, thanks to wingnut welfare.

 

[Winston]

I'm sorry, please elaborate as to what was wrong about her saying we can't take in everyone that wants to come here? And... according to ypoiur posted chart, Mexico does have the lowest education level of first generation immigrants. Again, how is she wrong?

And if you believe the facts of the WaPo as being meaningful saying it's not a problem, I will claim the statistics show our harsher viewpoint on illegal immigration is the cause of the decrease.

Why isn't it zero yet? I want illegal immigration to be zero. There are legal routes available for nearly all countries, and quotas for very sound reasons.

She be wrong. Trump's wrong too. Because, facts. Because, statistics. Go have a look for yourself.

 

[Yes_Minister]

given how wrong you constantly are, your depiction of TL's "talent" is your biased opinion. The good news, is you don't have to patronize her show and since you are not forced to spend any money on her, your stupid rant appears to be nothing more than a bit of butt hurt that someone you don't agree with is making money from uttering opinions that upset your sensibilities. BFD. And I couldn't care less that you claim your standards should matter to me.

Your claim that I am wrong all the time seemed pretty biased on your part eh? That's based on hubris rather then facts.

Also I did not have to patronize the media outlets that supported the Iraq War, they still helped that war along and Lahern is just as bad when it comes to misinformation:

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.theodysseyonline.com/response-letter-to-the-clueless-tomi-lahren.amp

Not patronizing media outlets I do not like does not stop them spreading misinformation and helping create bad policy, does it?

 

[TurtleDude]

Your claim that I am wrong all the time seemed pretty biased on your part eh? Thay's based on hubris rather then facts.

Also did not have to patronize the media outlets that supported the Iraq War, they still helped that war along and Lahern is just as bad when it comes to misinformation:

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.theodysseyonline.com/response-letter-to-the-clueless-tomi-lahren.amp

great idea for you that might help you-if you don't like what she says, or how she says it-turn the channel. I have no use for leftwing blatherers like Rachel Madcow or Colbert so I don't waste my time watching them. if you like what they spew, by all means watch them.

 

[Lord of Planar]

Conservatives keep complaining about the "liberal media", yet want a media system that rewards talentless hacks like Lahern. Conservatives complain about private news outfits like CNN, turn about is fair play I am using your own media critcism logic against you.

The complaints about the liberal media isn't that it is liberal. It's that the liberal media has to lie to make money. Conservative pundits don't have to lie about liberals to make money.

Lahern cares more about being a infotainer and provocateurs rather then presenting real news, which makes her worthy of contempt.

I'll entertain the notion that you are correct. Remove "provocateur" from your statement and that applies to nearly 100% of the media. Contempt comes from hatred. The definition of "contempt" that best applies to your statement is "disregard for something that should be taken into account." Why do you endorse disregarding facts that should be taken into account?

You do not care, because you do not have real standards and want to reward ideological purity over talent, which is what wingnut welfare is all about.

Tomi rails against the irrational and evil actions of liberals. She has standards that are up front and unforgiving. Her standards are on the right side of morality, which I cannot say about those who hate her.

 

[Lord of Planar]

That's these people like Lahern do not my respect or sympathy, they care about making a buck and often just say these things. She is a chess master for making money off a system I have no respect for? That's like taking candy from a baby.

I think society would be bettet Lahern and Coulter were working in fast food, but clearly some rubes will reward them for ideological purity and thus a fool and their money are soon parted. Lahern and Coulter do not have to work a day in their lives, thanks to wingnut welfare.

When you advocate the same thing for those on the left, I will accept your logic. Until then, do you realize how hypocritical you are?

 

[Lord of Planar]

She be wrong. Trump's wrong too. Because, facts. Because, statistics. Go have a look for yourself.

Everything I have looked up when some progressive or liberal asks me to was wrong. Have a particular example you have to prove your case, like a video in full context, complete and unedited?

 

[MrShangles]

LOL, maybe Putin could videotape it and blackmail me with the footage.

Oh here we go, Russia Russia Russia


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[ludin]

I'm thrilled that Tomi Lahren was publicly humiliated for the garbage she spews on a regular basis.

You guys act like she was drug behind a truck.

She got a drink thrown at her. I've had drinks thrown at me for playing the wrong song before. Big deal.

This right here folks is the type of stuff the rest of us should not have to put up with.
Agree with me or my opinion or be assaulted.

This right here is what is 100% wrong with america and the fact that we allow this type of mentality to exist and flourish only
shows how bad we have become as a country.

This right here folks is the epitome of what they mean by tolerance and inclusion.

 

[Winston]

This right here folks is the type of stuff the rest of us should not have to put up with.
Agree with me or my opinion or be assaulted.

This right here is what is 100% wrong with america and the fact that we allow this type of mentality to exist and flourish only
shows how bad we have become as a country.

This right here folks is the epitome of what they mean by tolerance and inclusion.

"The fact that we allow this type of mentality to exist."

While going on a diatribe about viewpoint suppression.


L.O.L.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[independentusa]

Oh here we go, Russia Russia Russia


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I forget how much the GOP and cons love Russia and Putin, as they are the ones that help put their master, Trump, into office. And one thing I do love about cons is that facts don't matte, science doesn't matter, only Donald has the truth and he tells them what it is. I am beginning to believe that the Trumpsters are part of a religion or a cult with Trump as their messiah.

 

[ludin]

"The fact that we allow this type of mentality to exist."

While going on a diatribe about viewpoint suppression.


L.O.L.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

you don't have a view point. your view point is assault people who don't agree with me.
yes in the name of self defense that view point should be supressed.

you might not like what someone says but that doesn't give you right to physically assault them.
if you do then they have a right to defend themselves in which i hope they do.

yes your mentality is what has driven violent behavior and that should never be tolerated.

 

[Winston]

you don't have a view point. your view point is assault people who don't agree with me.
yes in the name of self defense that view point should be supressed.

you might not like what someone says but that doesn't give you right to physically assault them.
if you do then they have a right to defend themselves in which i hope they do.

yes your mentality is what has driven violent behavior and that should never be tolerated.

Once again, watch the video, she got a drink thrown at her and no charges have been filed because she wasn't violently attacked. Which would've crossed a line. So, you would have a point, if she was attacked, but she wasn't.

Tomi Lahren is a dumbass. My viewpoint is that she should be mocked and ridiculed. The same way Alex Jones or, Sean Hannity should be mocked and ridiculed. They spread false and divisive propaganda. They add harm to the national dialogue and are dangerous people.

Why do you want to suppress my 1st amendment rights? I am defending myself and the country against harm, by using the power of free speech, contained within the 1st amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, .



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[TurtleDude]

I forget how much the GOP and cons love Russia and Putin, as they are the ones that help put their master, Trump, into office. And one thing I do love about cons is that facts don't matte, science doesn't matter, only Donald has the truth and he tells them what it is. I am beginning to believe that the Trumpsters are part of a religion or a cult with Trump as their messiah.

where do you come up with this crap? you lefties lose the election that was rigged in your favor. after you lose you try to find reasons why a disgusting POS loses to a lame candidate and rather than admit because hillary was an arrogant entitled POS, you now make up the BS that it had to be due to Russia and conservatives are now big fans of Russia: which is hilarious given how many years it was American lefties who were fluffing Russia.

 

[TurtleDude]

Once again, watch the video, she got a drink thrown at her and no charges have been filed because she wasn't violently attacked. Which would've crossed a line. So, you would have a point, if she was attacked, but she wasn't.

Tomi Lahren is a dumbass. My viewpoint is that she should be mocked and ridiculed. The same way Alex Jones or, Sean Hannity should be mocked and ridiculed. They spread false and divisive propaganda. They add harm to the national dialogue and are dangerous people.

Why do you want to suppress my 1st amendment rights? I am defending myself and the country against harm, by using the power of free speech, contained within the 1st amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, .



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

do you honestly think TL or SH really are stupid?

 

[Winston]

do you honestly think TL or SH really are stupid?

It's up for debate. Smart people wouldn't say ridiculous things about low skill immigrants having no home in America, without realizing that they are vulnerable to accusations of brutal hypocrisy, since their family, even just two generations removed were at one time penniless immigrants too.

As for SH, I begrudgingly admit he is at least average intelligence. But, if he believes the conspiracies he peddles, he's losing ground with me on that front. However, I think he's well aware that he peddles lies but, just a brutal hack and eager to fill the partisan vacuum created by O'Reilly's departure.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[TurtleDude]

It's up for debate. Smart people wouldn't say ridiculous things about low skill immigrants having no home in America, without realizing that they are vulnerable to accusations of brutal hypocrisy, since their family, even just two generations removed were at one time penniless immigrants too.

As for SH, I begrudgingly admit he is at least average intelligence. But, if he believes the conspiracies he peddles, he's losing ground with me on that front. However, I think he's well aware that he peddles lies but, just a brutal hack and eager to fill the partisan vacuum created by O'Reilly's departure.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

the way he triggers and plays liberals, he's clearly pretty smart. He's no different than poop throwers on the left like Bill Mahrer and other serial "liars" who say stuff to jack up their bank accounts. The funny thing is that (save for Rachel Madcow) the GOP bomb throwers actually tend to be the better educated for the most part-Laura Ingraham was top of her law school class and a supreme court clerk and our other blond bomb thrower Ann Coulter was an honors student at Cornell, an out of state admission to Michigan Law (as tough as Harvard to get in) where she was order of the coif and a law review editor. Both of those women have academic resumes that are similar to top professors at big name law schools like Chicago, Cornell, Columbia or Duke

 

[Winston]

the way he triggers and plays liberals, he's clearly pretty smart. He's no different than poop throwers on the left like Bill Mahrer and other serial "liars" who say stuff to jack up their bank accounts. The funny thing is that (save for Rachel Madcow) the GOP bomb throwers actually tend to be the better educated for the most part-Laura Ingraham was top of her law school class and a supreme court clerk and our other blond bomb thrower Ann Coulter was an honors student at Cornell, an out of state admission to Michigan Law (as tough as Harvard to get in) where she was order of the coif and a law review editor. Both of those women have academic resumes that are similar to top professors at big name law schools like Chicago, Cornell, Columbia or Duke

Ingraham got embarrassed by a 17 year old. Could happen to a smart person. Not sure where you stand on that feud. But, imo she started it and came out the worse for it.

But, I agree the qualifications of those women are impressive and weigh heavy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[ludin]

Once again, watch the video, she got a drink thrown at her and no charges have been filed because she wasn't violently attacked. Which would've crossed a line. So, you would have a point, if she was attacked, but she wasn't.

Tomi Lahren is a dumbass. My viewpoint is that she should be mocked and ridiculed. The same way Alex Jones or, Sean Hannity should be mocked and ridiculed. They spread false and divisive propaganda. They add harm to the national dialogue and are dangerous people.

and he continues to spout the bs of tolerance and inclusion. it doesn't have to be violent attack for it to be assault. she should have never had a drink thrown in her face that is crossing the line in a supposed decent society.
yes people like you are dangerous people. which is why we need to stand up against it everywhere.

Why do you want to suppress my 1st amendment rights? I am defending myself and the country against harm, by using the power of free speech, contained within the 1st amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, .

Why do you think it is ok to assault people? you are defending nothing.
throwing drinks at people is not free speech.

it is the person acting like an ass. the fact that you support it tells us all we need to know about you.

agree with me or be assaulted.

might makes right correct?