- Joined
- Oct 12, 2005
- Messages
- 281,619
- Reaction score
- 100,389
- Location
- Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Expanded California Assault Weapon Ban Leaves Thousands Of Gun Owners In Limbo « CBS San Francisco
There are thousands if not tens of thousands of legally owned ARs in California right now. Beginning January 1st 2018 an AR with a bullet button is either going to have to be modified or registered with the state to remain legal. The problem is you can’t even register an AR right now.
“They don’t know how to implement these laws,” said Craig Deluz with the Firearms Policy Coalition, a group that lobbies for gun owner rights in California.He says the new law requires the Department of Justice to come up with new regulations before it can open up an electronic registration system. But so far the agency has failed to do that. That’s leaving law abiding gun owners who want to register but can’t in a Catch 22.
And this idiotic change in law impedes criminals how? you cannot punish a criminal who fails to register a firearm he possess, that was set forth in a 1968 supreme court case which is still good case law
There are thousands if not tens of thousands of legally owned ARs in California right now. Beginning January 1st 2018 an AR with a bullet button is either going to have to be modified or registered with the state to remain legal. The problem is you can’t even register an AR right now.
“They don’t know how to implement these laws,” said Craig Deluz with the Firearms Policy Coalition, a group that lobbies for gun owner rights in California.He says the new law requires the Department of Justice to come up with new regulations before it can open up an electronic registration system. But so far the agency has failed to do that. That’s leaving law abiding gun owners who want to register but can’t in a Catch 22.
And this idiotic change in law impedes criminals how? you cannot punish a criminal who fails to register a firearm he possess, that was set forth in a 1968 supreme court case which is still good case law