• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The New York Times Anti-Kavanaugh Bombshell Is Actually a Dud

Bullseye said:
NYT-slurpers have to hang together, eh?
Click to expand...

trix and smallvoice seem to think you were clever, but then, they'd think it clever if you bent over and farted at an alleged librul. I actually don't read the NYT anymore. Oh well. Keep up the Trumpist lies. I'm sure the orange lout will reward you one day.

:lol:







That said, the very last thing in reality I would ever worry about is a Bullseye, trix, small armada. I'll just wave a flag with Clinton painted in red on it, and you'll run right off a cliff of your own accord.
 
trixare4kids said:
Yes, except The Times when reporting something from the book lies by omission making their bombshell allegation nothing more than propaganda.
Click to expand...

It's really sad what is happening in the media. It's like a Jerry Springer show only more cruel and demeaning.
 
Mr Person said:
trix and smallvoice seem to think you were clever, but then, they'd think it clever if you bent over and farted at an alleged librul. I actually don't read the NYT anymore. Oh well. Keep up the Trumpist lies. I'm sure the orange lout will reward you one day.

:lol:







That said, the very last thing in reality I would ever worry about is a Bullseye, trix, small armada. I'll just wave a flag with Clinton painted in red on it, and you'll run right off a cliff of your own accord.
Click to expand...
Well, this erased all doubt about your cleverness. :no:
 
Cardinal said:
Yeah, I’ll wait before taking the word of an editor from national review.
Click to expand...
But your all in on taking the NYTs word for it, who is taking it not on the word of the woman it alledgedly happened to, or even on steirs who supposedly witnessed it. They are taking the word of two people who he alledgedly told the story to. But you dont see a credibility problem with that?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
Mr Person said:
Anyone wanna vet the "national review" propaganda outlet's claims? The story as I understand it is that the allegations were made and the FBI did not investigate.

Every time I've given sources like "National Review" a pass and posted on the assumption their story was true, it blew up in my face. And with this OP...heh... let's just say I have every last reason in the universe to be skeptical.


I wouldn't be surprised if it's something like "person who says they know complainant does not remember complainant mentioning it. HOAX!" But what do I know. Definitely need more than lying Trump-slurpers' words for it.
Click to expand...

Bullseye said:
NYT-slurpers have to hang together, eh?
Click to expand...

Mr Person said:
trix and smallvoice seem to think you were clever, but then, they'd think it clever if you bent over and farted at an alleged librul. I actually don't read the NYT anymore. Oh well. Keep up the Trumpist lies. I'm sure the orange lout will reward you one day.

:lol:



That said, the very last thing in reality I would ever worry about is a Bullseye, trix, small armada. I'll just wave a flag with Clinton painted in red on it, and you'll run right off a cliff of your own accord.
Click to expand...

Bullseye said:
Well, this erased all doubt about your cleverness.
Click to expand...

Cowardly response.

Keep running, then. Or do you need the last word to tell yourself you "won"?
 
Winston said:
So, what are they saying? I haven't followed this story. Ole Brett the 'Half Barrel' Kavanaugh pulled his weiner out and shook it around? Kinda odd these stories keep following him around.

But, they got the story second hand and the girl is denying it ever happened? Or, that she can't remember it happened? Repressed memories are a real thing. Or.. drunken exposure, if you're used to drunken exposure, could be easily forgotten.
Click to expand...
Trump rips new Kavanaugh claim | On Air Videos | Fox News

10 min clip from media buzz this morning that talks about it. Dont know if you ever saw the show before but howie kurtz is the host and he is pretty even handed and openly criticizes both sides including coverage by fox. Its worth the watch.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
Mr Person said:
Anyone wanna vet the "national review" propaganda outlet's claims? The story as I understand it is that the allegations were made and the FBI did not investigate.

Every time I've given sources like "National Review" a pass and posted on the assumption their story was true, it blew up in my face. And with this OP...heh... let's just say I have every last reason in the universe to be skeptical.

I wouldn't be surprised if it's something like "person who says they know complainant does not remember complainant mentioning it. HOAX!" But what do I know. Definitely need more than lying Trump-slurpers' words for it.
Click to expand...

Anything less than a 120 year FBI investigation into every baseless claim by every sleazy Clinton operative DECADES after the fact rehashed to pump book sales?

Unacceptable!!!!!!!!

:donkeyfla
 
Lutherf said:
It's really sad what is happening in the media. It's like a Jerry Springer show only more cruel and demeaning.
Click to expand...

Before I came to this forum, I've been posting about this subject a lot. When Trump talks about fake news, he's not exaggerating. He's not right about all of it, but he is right about most of it. It's been going on since the Obama administration, who IMO, they failed to vet properly, and since they didn't get his third term in, the media has been off the charts deceiving the reader and viewer with their anti-Trump blathering.
 
Mr Person said:
Is it false that the FBI did not look into it? Or did they in fact look into it and she said "nah, what?"
Click to expand...
I have the same question because if its true thst she has no recolletion of it happening to her there isnt much to investigate. Im not accussing stier of fabricating it but its also worth nothing that him and kavanaugh were legal and political adversaries during clintons impeachment trial. It does call into question his credability.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
Cardinal said:
I’ll wait for the book itself rather than a summarization by an editor for a right wing rag, but thanks.
Click to expand...

Buy anything less than 10 copies?

Trump has won!!!!

Available on Amazon for the low low price of just $29.99!!!!!!

:donkeyfla
 
So this person is commenting on what she read on Twitter from someone else who is reading the book?

I have no idea where this will all lead but my personal opinion back during the whole ordeal was that the FBI would have been best to look at the list of people who say they had information but were never contacted. If they were told to ignore certain individuals by anyone including the potus then Kavanaugh will never be in the clear. If they had contacted everyone on that list this wouldn't be coming up now.

I do see Business Insider and Wall Street Journal have picked up the allegations story, so Tues should clear it all up.
 
trixare4kids said:
The NY Times on 9/'18 wrote this paragraph...(see below)

The NY Time conveniently dismissed facts when trying to create a whole new narrative using lies by omission in last night's "news" article....9/14/19.

Guy Benson on Twitter: "Read this paragraph from the New York Times, then re-read it. [url]https://t.co/6Qt4UnW4F2… "[/url]

The paragraph:
"The Times had interviewed several dozen people over the past week in an attempt to corroborate her story, and could find no one with firsthand knowledge. Ms. Ramirez herself contacted former Yale classmates asking if they recalled the incident and told some of them that she could not be certain Mr. Kavanaugh was the one who exposed himself."


Christine Blasey Ford Reaches Deal to Testify at Kavanaugh Hearing - The New York Times
Click to expand...

Kavanaugh is LITERALLY Goebbels in a Raincoat!!!

Stop defending him!!!!!!!!

:donkeyfla
 
Bullseye said:
The obsessions of our prog/lib friends continues to amaze me. The have an election coming up yet they continue to "fight the last war". From what I've read Kavenaugh hasn't prove to be the ultra-right hard core they feared. But, in their twisted minds he still counts as a loss and they never can make peace with it.
Click to expand...
They are trying to persuade casual observers that voting for republicans is voting to put sexual abusers on the bench. This ia ALL about the 2020 election and the fight over the independents.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
Mr Person said:
Anyone wanna vet the "national review" propaganda outlet's claims? The story as I understand it is that the allegations were made and the FBI did not investigate.

Every time I've given sources like "National Review" a pass and posted on the assumption their story was true, it blew up in my face. And with this OP...heh... let's just say I have every last reason in the universe to be skeptical.




I wouldn't be surprised if it's something like "person who says they know complainant does not remember complainant mentioning it. HOAX!" But what do I know. Definitely need more than lying Trump-slurpers' words for it.
Click to expand...

I personally think what we'll see is more stories planted by right wing backroom players that look legitimate and are designed to blow up in the media once opened and make the major news outlets look like fools. Part of the trump 'you can only believe me' idea of thinking.
 
3leftsdoo said:
And Stier - the 3rd party alleger - is a sleazy Clinton hitman/pimp.

Triple nothing burger; liberal hysteria played yet AGAIN.
Click to expand...

Yep, all political theater.
Maybe to take our minds off of McCabe, and Durham's impending report?
 
trixare4kids said:
Before I came to this forum, I've been posting about this subject a lot. When Trump talks about fake news, he's not exaggerating. He's not right about all of it, but he is right about most of it. It's been going on since the Obama administration, who IMO, they failed to vet properly, and since they didn't get his third term in, the media has been off the charts deceiving the reader and viewer with their anti-Trump blathering.
Click to expand...

The media, cable news in particular, has succumbed to the social media effect. Their viewers tend to be VERY tuned inn to the internet in general and social media in particular. If they fail to discuss stories that are going around the web then their viewers are going to lose interest in their shows. To that end, they have gone to great lengths to cherry pick certain demographics and those are the ones they cater to. It's no longer a matter of getting to the bottom of some conspiracy or breaking some dramatic new story. It's about getting your demographic to tune in to your show, click on your web page and follow your Twitter feed. Truth and ethical journalism simply don't have much of a place in that model. It's all about getting that next next emotionally spurred, endorphin fueled finger click from the viewership.
 
jimbo said:
As a matter of procedure, I suspect the FBI investigates every filed complaint. Undoubtedly this and millions of others do not make it past the first reading. You don't make your case any better with the use of descriptive phrases like lying Trump-slurpers, but if it makes you feel better, why not?
Click to expand...

This investigation required 200 agents, 300 years, and 400 billion dollars to properly complete!!

Anything less is clear evidence that Trump is Orange Hitler, and the FBI his personal SS!!!!

:donkeyfla
 
trixare4kids said:
At this point, they have nothing left to offer but nut-uhs, and Trump's base slurps.
They're certainly not interested in vetting the NYT's crap which should tell us all that they don't really care about the truth.
Click to expand...

The truth????

You can't handle the truth that Trump is LITERALLY Hitler!!!!

:donkeyfla
 
More fake news designed as click bait for the masses!!!! When are the clickers going to learn?
 
Winston said:
So, what are they saying? I haven't followed this story. Ole Brett the 'Half Barrel' Kavanaugh pulled his weiner out and shook it around? Kinda odd these stories keep following him around.

But, they got the story second hand and the girl is denying it ever happened? Or, that she can't remember it happened? Repressed memories are a real thing. Or.. drunken exposure, if you're used to drunken exposure, could be easily forgotten.
Click to expand...

It is not odd they follow him around.

An election is coming up so the Dems are bringing out a story that didn't get much play during his confirmation hearings. There is nothing new here other than the timing of writing the articles on it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom