That NIST pretend walk off never happened.
You don't know that. That is merely a biased assertion of little merit. prove to me it didn't happen, for Tony failed andd Husley has yet to do this.
Every idiot knows that a single columnar collapse cannot, as in it is impossible, for a free fall, symmetrical collapse to occur.
You know the report stated that this load shift triggered the progressive collapse. Why are you attempting to misrepresent it?
NIST has proved themselves wrong with their lies - some 12 lies about the drawings/plans for WTC7; NIST lied about shear studs, web stiffeners, the distance of the supposed walk off, ... .
So you assert. You do understand that your assertion lacks merit owing to a lack of evidence on your part?
The chance of NIST's fable about walk off happening is ZERO. A comprehensive forensic study done by the UofA Fairbanks, done to give NIST all the benefit of the doubt found that the chance of NIST being right is ZERO.
So, you and they asserted. I've yet to see a valid study based on this premise. Assertions are merely fallacious as is the argument from authority.
Look at NIST's computer simulation. They actually have the gall to suggest that it looks like reality,
So, you do not realise that the animation itself demonstrates the interior collapse and the curtain wall was omitted for clarity. Many completely miss that little fact and I understand your confusion, for it without that detail, it would look specious.
that is the videos of the actual controlled demolition.
So the truther movement believes, but there is a leap of logic lacking evidence within that assumption.
All metabunkers know full well that it looks nothing like reality. Reality, which is not at all metabunkers long suit,
Please, do we really need this constant silly ad hominem style of debate? it's somewhat puerile. Don't you think if you spent more time on the evidence instead of mindless insults, your argument would have more strength?
clearly illustrates what the science and the evidence shows, WTC7 was a controlled demolition, just like the twin towers.
But CD does not stand up to scrutiny for very long. It was impractical and the conclusion is illogical owing to the evidence and logistical problems. Moreover, how does the possibility of the NIST being wrong prove that CD occurred? it doesn't, it merely denotes (hypothetically) that the NIST were wrong.
All this means that there never were any Muslim hijackers, there never was any OBL involvement.
Again, that is an irrational conclusion lacking evidence, so why should I take it on faith? Science doesn't work on faith.
[quote[All the metabunkers know full well that they have been played once again by their always lying governments. Why do folks still support the evil people who have murdered 6000 of their own and millions of other totally innocent people?[/QUOTE]
More ad hominem nonsense. I may begin to edit all this muck out of your responses, as it is just supercilious rubbish.
