Ah, but you are. That is precisely what "A Year of Living Biblically" does. He didn't live Biblically, because he lived life exactly counter to the commands of Jesus. He attempted to show the troubles of the Bible while ignoring how the Bible ultimately teaches people to live.
It's like those old tests they gave in school to see who follows instructions with 50 steps, and the first step says read all steps first, and the 50th step says skip steps 2 through 49.. The Bible doesn't ask you to skip ALL the steps, but the steps they tell you to follow are generally be kind to pothers and don't judge, and the steps they tell you to skip are "Don't wear mixed fibers", "Don't shave"... essentially all the stuff he did under the guise of being "Biblical" are the things the actual Bible tells you and no longer your concern.
In other words, if he "lives Biblically" but doesn't address the laws of the New Covenant then he was following the Torah, or the Quran... he was living a life of a Hasidic Jew or devout Muslim, not a Christian. So his findings of "Living Biblically" would be far more applicable to those groups, not Christians. When you give him props for not being a selective Biblical Literalist you couldn't be more wrong, he was such a selective Biblical literalist that he skipped the entire teachings of Jesus! :roll: