• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Teen Taken at U.S. Border Tells of ‘Icebox’ Cages With 60 Girls

Okay so killing kids via abortion is okay with the left but detaining kids is not. I have the solution instead providing them food, water, medical attention while they are being detained lets just take them out and shoot them, call it a late term abortion.
 
Brown people--no one on the Right cares.
 
Brown people--no one on the Right cares.

A racist comment that is untrue in the generic sense. Would it be true is someone said no one who is a "Centrists" cares about laws. Of course not some do and some don't.:mrgreen:
 
Years ago I lived 12 miles from Mexicali, Mexico. I would occasionally switch over to a Mexican television station and see advertisements advising people to make sure they took adequate water with them so they could make it through the desert.

Does this mean Mexico supports violating our immigration laws?

In the town of Holtville, California there is a cemetery. Not unusual, most towns have at least one. What makes this one unique is in the back there are a lot of graves that are marked John Doe and Jane Doe followed by a number. These are the unidentified illegals that died trying to cross that desert (guess they should have packed more water).

Would a strong, tall, wall that is difficult if not impossible to breach have saved those lives? Think about it, the harder we make it for people to enter illegally the more deaths we will prevent.
 
What should the US govt do for US citizens threated by gangs in the US. Should the govt help them relocate?

you seem unfamiliar with the concept and application of asylum practices
 
Let me try to understand this.

The woman leaves her country because she doesn't want to pay the "rent" on her small business.

She doesn't just close the business and go somewhere else, she flees the country.

Where does she go?

She goes to the other country that has the MS-13 gang.

What did she hope to accomplish with this?

safety for her family
 
They didn’t have a choice

Interesting that you say she had no choice but last time I checked El Salvador doesn't share a border with the US. So what made it mandatory that she had to come to the US.
 
Interesting that you say she had no choice but last time I checked El Salvador doesn't share a border with the US. So what made it mandatory that she had to come to the US.

Air conditioning?
 
You don't think Costa Rica is safe? What about Panama? Why not go to Argentina or Paraguay?

costa rica has no standing army. panama is not long past its own dictatorship, i would imagine argentina would be a longer hike, and paraguay is not known for its asylum programs. the USA is not a place where these MS13 victims should need to fear further repercussions from MS13; from tRump acolytes, maybe, but not from MS13
 
costa rica has no standing army. panama is not long past its own dictatorship, i would imagine argentina would be a longer hike, and paraguay is not known for its asylum programs. the USA is not a place where these MS13 victims should need to fear further repercussions from MS13; from tRump acolytes, maybe, but not from MS13

Why do refugees need to relocate to a country with a standing army? Why go north rather than south to a country with no language barrier?
 
Why do refugees need to relocate to a country with a standing army? Why go north rather than south to a country with no language barrier?

USA is known to be a safe haven with opportunities; much more so than the variety of second and third world locations you suggested
the significance of the absence of a standing army is the absence of a military presence to dissuade activities from MS13 in costa rica
 
you seem unfamiliar with the concept and application of asylum practices

You seem to ignore questions. Yes, illegal aliens can apply for asylum. Now are you saying all (100%) of illegal aliens are claiming asylum?
 
USA is known to be a safe haven with opportunities; much more so than the variety of second and third world locations you suggested
the significance of the absence of a standing army is the absence of a military presence to dissuade activities from MS13 in costa rica
Despite you trying to pretend otherwise your own posts prove that the claim that she had no options is complete BS.
 
Despite you trying to pretend otherwise your own posts prove that the claim that she had no options is complete BS.

before i call your post a complete lie, i will provide you with 24 hours to identify for our forum members in which post i stated the mother had no options
truly looking forward to your reply
 
What I don't understand is why doesn't Mexico take these people in? They have similar languages and cultures and they would probably integrate better into their society than hiding illegally in America. According to their new president its a right for people to live anywhere they want, so why don't they start opening their borders for them?

A lot of them do remain in Mexico, apparently. Mexico has been inconsistent in their policies towards Central Americans for a while, much like the US.
 
The shouldnt be kept in cages. They should be put on a bus and shipped to Canada.
 
before i call your post a complete lie, i will provide you with 24 hours to identify for our forum members in which post i stated the mother had no options
truly looking forward to your reply

Notice how I didn't say it was your claim. It was a claim that was being discussed in this thread.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom