• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Teacher has sex with 13 year old boy

What if it was a male teacher having sex with a male 13 year old.


How do some of you folks feel about it now?
Caveat every comment I am about to make with "ALL sexual exploitation of children by adults is wrong". If someone isnt smart enough to understand that then there is no value in having a real conversation about any of this in the first place. There is simply no way a 13 year can relate on the same emotional scale and perspective that an adult is capable of relating and it is ALWAYS exploitative and manipulative. You can think about the developing brain in a logic/problem solving progression from a Tic Tac Toe brain to a Checkers brain to a chess brain. Children employ tic tac toe thinking. Adolescents typically use checkers thinking. Adults are capable (though dont always use) chess thought processes...using long term decision making and consequences.

There is a 'natural order' involving 'consensual' sexual abuse between an adult and a minor. Again...it is all destructive, but in certain cases seen as less so

Female on female...if seen as a 'supportive' sapphic loving...still wrong but can be not devastating.
Adult male on female..if seen as 'supportive' is 'natural' in that male female relationships are natural and often the men stoke the ego of the victim by elevating them to an adult status.
Adult female on male...if seen as supportive is also 'natural' in that male female relationships are natural and often the boys stoke their own ego elevating them to an adult status. Its often (not always) accompanied by a 'story' from the female perpetrator implying she is a victim in other relationships, further stoking the ego of the victim as they see themselves as a savior.
Adult male on male...tricky...depending on whether or not the victim has demonstrated and accepted homosexual ideation, in which case the above can apply. But if not, it is devastating and creates massive damage to the ego and identity of the victim, often resulting in future instances of varying forms of inappropriate behaviors.

All bets are off when the manipulation is done by violence, force, and/or coercion.

SO I hope that answers your question, but if your question was SPECIFICALLY asked...it would be more impactful...What if it was a male teacher having sex with YOUR male 13 year old. (or daughter for that matter)...but even then you would probably only get an honest answer from those that actually have kids that might be in that situation.
 
Caveat every comment I am about to make with "ALL sexual exploitation of children by adults is wrong". If someone isnt smart enough to understand that then there is no value in having a real conversation about any of this in the first place. There is simply no way a 13 year can relate on the same emotional scale and perspective that an adult is capable of relating and it is ALWAYS exploitative and manipulative. You can think about the developing brain in a logic/problem solving progression from a Tic Tac Toe brain to a Checkers brain to a chess brain. Children employ tic tac toe thinking. Adolescents typically use checkers thinking. Adults are capable (though dont always use) chess thought processes...using long term decision making and consequences.

There is a 'natural order' involving 'consensual' sexual abuse between an adult and a minor. Again...it is all destructive, but in certain cases seen as less so

Female on female...if seen as a 'supportive' sapphic loving...still wrong but can be not devastating.
Adult male on female..if seen as 'supportive' is 'natural' in that male female relationships are natural and often the men stoke the ego of the victim by elevating them to an adult status.
Adult female on male...if seen as supportive is also 'natural' in that male female relationships are natural and often the boys stoke their own ego elevating them to an adult status. Its often (not always) accompanied by a 'story' from the female perpetrator implying she is a victim in other relationships, further stoking the ego of the victim as they see themselves as a savior.
Adult male on male...tricky...depending on whether or not the victim has demonstrated and accepted homosexual ideation, in which case the above can apply. But if not, it is devastating and creates massive damage to the ego and identity of the victim, often resulting in future instances of varying forms of inappropriate behaviors.

All bets are off when the manipulation is done by violence, force, and/or coercion.

SO I hope that answers your question, but if your question was SPECIFICALLY asked...it would be more impactful...What if it was a male teacher having sex with YOUR male 13 year old. (or daughter for that matter)...but even then you would probably only get an honest answer from those that actually have kids that might be in that situation.

All joking aside, the fact remains this was one mentally ****ed up chick. And, she probably should not be anywhere near young boys, given her actions here and apparent history of "coming onto" other boys in the past.

Chances are that even if it was all in good fun for the teenager, eventually the chick's nutty side would have emerged. And, there is no way that poor kid could have handled that.
 
All joking aside, the fact remains this was one mentally ****ed up chick. And, she probably should not be anywhere near young boys, given her actions here and apparent history of "coming onto" other boys in the past.

Chances are that even if it was all in good fun for the teenager, eventually the chick's nutty side would have emerged. And, there is no way that poor kid could have handled that.
Precisely. If she were denied access to 13 year olds its probable she would pick progressively younger victims. Thats the danger of downplaying the instances of female teacher/teen victim sexual assault.
 
Precisely. If she were denied access to 13 year olds its probable she would pick progressively younger victims. Thats the danger of downplaying the instances of female teacher/teen victim sexual assault.

Yeah, she had issues, to say the least.

This is the stuff I was referring to, btw.

One of the parents of the victim recounted to police investigators how Zamora tried to maintain a sense of control over his life.

"(Victim) said he was talking to a girl he liked and he told his friend about it," police wrote in the report. "Somehow Brittany found out that (victim) liked this girl and told him that he couldn't talk to this girl. Brittany also said that, if he dated the girl, she would get other girls to beat her up."

Brittany Zamora may have been grooming other students, report shows

The crazy lady quickly took what maybe was perceived by the boy as "fun and games" to a serious level of being trapped in a relationship with the psycho bitch from hell. That's something any 13-yr-old kid is ill equipped to handle.
 
No they werent.

I Think that people tend to convince themselves of that because their heads would explode if the answer went the other way....they believe what they have to believe to keep their emotions peppy!
 
His former teacher should be required to tutor him until he can command a market based wage in our first world economy, to be able to afford to make child support payments.
 


It's an old double standard. Society will jail a male teacher who has sex with a female student, while a female teacher having sex with a boy is often overlooked.

The boy calls the teach Ms Zamorra which is funny.


Lucky thirteen.
 
His former teacher should be required to tutor him until he can command a market based wage in our first world economy, to be able to afford to make child support payments.

You want to put the sex offender in an authority position over the child victim?

Is that the Catholic method?
 
You want to put the sex offender in an authority position over the child victim?

Is that the Catholic method?

Only adults should have to make child support payments. He must be emancipated and be an adult about things now. Besides, the left is for helping us learn from our mistakes as a "form of penance".
 


It's an old double standard. Society will jail a male teacher who has sex with a female student, while a female teacher having sex with a boy is often overlooked.

The boy calls the teach Ms Zamorra which is funny.


America continues to reap the fruits of its erection of a stupid wall of separation between God and humanity. Without God, people are little more than animals, but, no, that is not proof of evolution. That is proof of sin, the origin of which is something else evolutionists cannot explain.
 
Yes. See post 21.

this story (she got 20 years in the slammer) and the Super Bowl Party story (in Late Breaking News this morning) are really weird since the stories are so old (and this one decided).
 
Only adults should have to make child support payments. He must be emancipated and be an adult about things now. Besides, the left is for helping us learn from our mistakes as a "form of penance".

Look, let's forget the child support thing for a moment. Let's deal with the first problem in your idea. We're not making the offender the child's tutor for the next 6 years. That's an unbelievably bad idea.

Can we agree on that?
 
Look, let's forget the child support thing for a moment. Let's deal with the first problem in your idea. We're not making the offender the child's tutor for the next 6 years. That's an unbelievably bad idea.

Can we agree on that?

My idea only concerned participation in adult markets as an adult in our economy, regarding mandatory child support payments.
 
this story (she got 20 years in the slammer) and the Super Bowl Party story (in Late Breaking News this morning) are really weird since the stories are so old (and this one decided).

Maybe some are fed up with all the COVID-19 coverage. So they look for old tabloid type stories to post.
 
Being pounded by an adult at 13 is not quite the same as pounding an adult at 13. You get that, right?

Ah so if the woman used a strap on on the boy, that's 100% different, eh?
 
I agree to resort to the law of large numbers for the sake of equality and equal protection of the laws. How many women complain they cannot get enough sex versus how many guys?

Women should be held responsible for the teaching of males about sex due to their absolute advantage when it comes to sex.

The public policy goal is to reduce or eliminate any male urge to rape in anger versus role playing fun.

And now you dismiss female rapists, regardless of the gender of the victim.
 
There may very well be some young girls who are not "victims" in these situations. But, I suspect there are a lot more boys who would jump at the chance to bang hot teacher than there are girls with that mindset.

Granted, I understand the law does not allow for any teen under age of 16 or so to consent to sex. But, I bet the house most boys at 14 or so would argue that law should not apply to them.

There are 10 year olds, even 8 year olds who would make that argument. There are plenty below 16 who would argue that the drinking law shouldn't apply to them. Does that mean that they are capable of making a properly informed consensual decision?
 
All this shows is no concern for long term welfare of the child.

People who do not care about what is morally right and do not believe God tend to advocate for things which are very bad even though they do not understand why those things are bad. Obama did not think it was bad to appoint a homosexual advocate to administer the sex education needs of American school kids, but both Obama and Kevin Jennings were bad news for that. Jennings is a pervert who supports the NAMBLA advocacy for legalizing sex between men and boys. The NAMBLA perverts do not see themselves as perverts. Obama did not see graphic homosexual sex instruction as a bad thing to force onto kids in American schools, but it is a very bad thing.
 
There are 10 year olds, even 8 year olds who would make that argument. There are plenty below 16 who would argue that the drinking law shouldn't apply to them. Does that mean that they are capable of making a properly informed consensual decision?

As a son of European immigrants, I grew up being allowed to drink at 16, it was 14 IIRC. So, that argument falls flat.

Sex was not frowned upon in my household either. I believe I was "educated" on safe sexual practices by age 14, and bringing girls home for sex by 16. For some strange reason my parents were pretty ant-gay tho. I never could reconcile that.
 
His former teacher should be required to tutor him until he can command a market based wage in our first world economy, to be able to afford to make child support payments.

That is one of the other hypocritical view. That as the victim, the boy would have to pay child support. It has happened already. There is the complaint that women should not have to suffer reminders of their rape for 18+ years, but for some reason, who cares if a male has to suffer that long for something not his fault?
 
Should it be more socially acceptable for women to ask a gang of Men to help out instead of resorting to using an easy and convenient boy?

Yes. The men are adults and can provide actual informed consent. A 13 year old cannot. I won't slut shame. Have as many lovers as you want as long as you are being safe (to include STI transmission reductions efforts), and don't lie about your activities to other you are involved in.
 
Back
Top Bottom