Doesn't your version of the Bible refer the Jesus as "He" with a capital "H" - which is only reserved for god ?
Do you see it?:roll:
Doesn't your version of the Bible refer the Jesus as "He" with a capital "H" - which is only reserved for god ?
NOPE... Just get your facts straight. The word 'trinity' is NOT in the Book of Matthew, or anywhere else in the bible, as you previously posted. ( fact )
Then I suggest you ask the right questions instead of wasting everybody's time with your petty arguments.
There are no 'wrong' questions...Only 'wrong' answers..Case in Point: When you posted that the word 'trinity' is in the Book of Matthew, clearly you were 'WRONG.' ( again ) Of course, you could try and prove me wrong by posting any verse from Matthew, or any other biblical scripture with the word 'trinity' in it..( Won't be holding breath waiting on that to happen ). Those who actually know biblical scripture know the word 'trinity' is NOT in ANY biblical scripture.
Their are , however, phrases that are interpreted to imply the trinity. Not everyone agrees with that interpretation.
There are no 'wrong' questions...Only 'wrong' answers..Case in Point: When you posted that the word 'trinity' is in the Book of Matthew, clearly you were 'WRONG.' ( again ) Of course, you could try and prove me wrong by posting any verse from Matthew, or any other biblical scripture with the word 'trinity' in it..( Won't be holding breath waiting on that to happen ). Those who actually know biblical scripture know the word 'trinity' is NOT in ANY biblical scripture.
Do you see it?:roll:
IDK, which version you use.
Doesn't your version of the Bible refer the Jesus as "He" with a capital "H" - which is only reserved for god ?
Really?:roll:
No, that is why I was asking.
The King James version does. IDK which version you use though.
No, that is why I was asking.
The King James version does. IDK which version you use though.
agreed
There are no 'wrong' questions...Only 'wrong' answers..Case in Point: When you posted that the word 'trinity' is in the Book of Matthew, clearly you were 'WRONG.' ( again ) Of course, you could try and prove me wrong by posting any verse from Matthew, or any other biblical scripture with the word 'trinity' in it..( Won't be holding breath waiting on that to happen ). Those who actually know biblical scripture know the word 'trinity' is NOT in ANY biblical scripture.
If you agree, what is your problem? You can't see that baptizing in the name of the Father, The Son, and the Holy Ghost, connotes a Triune being? If you don't agree that's fine and we can let it go at that but demanding to be shown where to find the word Trinity does nothing to move the ball down the field.
Which tells me that you're not really interested in moving the ball down the field, just in stopping the game.
Those who actually.know scripture know that the word "trinity" doesn't have to appear in scripture.
Silly thread.Where does your "god" stand regarding tattoos?
What happens to those people who have them?
Punishment of some sort? Hell? No key to secret VIP room?
If your god has an issue with tattoos, why do you think he/she would care?
Most especially why would your "god" care if it's your soul that moves on to the "after-life" and not your physical body?
As a side question, if your "god" has a serious issue with tattoos, what about piercings, brands, and other body modifications?
What about breast enlargements/augmentations that are strictly for personal aesthetics? Tummy tucks? Nose jobs? Face lifts?
Your crystal ball is broken.
Red herring/strawmanning. You just moved the goal posts. Fact remains you're on record as posting the word 'trinity' is in the bible: Book of Matthew to be more precise. That claim is biblically incorrect....end of story....time to move on and stop beating that dead horse.
Silly thread.
God, without scare quotes, mind you -- God is beyond your ken.
And "ken" is not the beloved doll you had as a child.
Red herring/strawmanning. You just moved the goal posts. Fact remains you're on record as posting the word 'trinity' is in the bible: Book of Matthew to be more precise. That claim is biblically incorrect....end of story....time to move on and stop beating that dead horse.
Actually the 0's would span two years: 364 days after 1 BCE and 364 days before 1 AD. So, the year Zero had 728 days.
And you never had one.
I thought you might have the candlepower to see what was being said. My mistake.
Gods do not exist. But, feel free to try proving they do. Meanwhile, I'll laugh at the idiocy it takes to believe one does.