"Take her out!"

[HumblePi]

Interesting how no testimony shows that nor was that even one of the Articles of Impeachment however you obviously know better showing your partisanship and hate for Trump

So now the results generated by Trump are what the Founding Father's feared? Looks like a Canadian view of history and our Constitution, WRONG!!

Our Founders IMO would never support what the Democrats are doing nor does the country. Going to be a long 5 more years for you as Trump gets re-elected. A lot of liberals are going to need some medical help to overcome TDS

"Obviously" you never watched any of the evidence as it was systematically being presented, crumb-by-crumb specifically for non-believers such as yourself. The evidence was concise and clear, and there was enough of it to indict ten sitting presidents under any normal circumstances.

 

[HumblePi]

Watch the next three days!!!

I have watched all of it and I fully intend to watch every minute. Question is, have YOU watched all of it so far? I don't think so.

 

[j brown's body]

Since Trump is the only one who can fire an Ambassador, him telling an aid to take her out IS him doing it himself.

An aid? He doesn't even know the guy *wink, wink*.

 

[j brown's body]

Interesting how no testimony shows that nor was that even one of the Articles of Impeachment however you obviously know better showing your partisanship and hate for Trump

So now the results generated by Trump are what the Founding Father's feared? Looks like a Canadian view of history and our Constitution, WRONG!!

Our Founders IMO would never support what the Democrats are doing nor does the country. Going to be a long 5 more years for you as Trump gets re-elected. A lot of liberals are going to need some medical help to overcome TDS

Trump is damned by his own words. His acting chief of staff admitted it. And so did his personal lawyer.

 

[Conservative]

"Obviously" you never watched any of the evidence as it was systematically being presented, crumb-by-crumb specifically for non-believers such as yourself. The evidence was concise and clear, and there was enough of it to indict ten sitting presidents under any normal circumstances.

What evidence, hearsay, rumor, speculation, out of context quotes, lies, just another day in the life of a Democrat. It is easy to fool a lot of people but the reality is Trump is going to be acquitted then what for people like you?

 

[Conservative]

I have watched all of it and I fully intend to watch every minute. Question is, have YOU watched all of it so far? I don't think so.

You are right, I like most Americans have no interest in this as we all know that it is trumped up material based upon hatred and total fabrication Abuse of Congress?? LOL, you think a political biased party is capable of making an non partisan claim of abuse of power? that is the courts responsibility, not Congress. Your party is a joke and as the poll numbers show, you don't have the American support and it is going to be a long 5 more years for you

 

[HumblePi]

What evidence, lies, distortions, out of context remarks all to get rid of a President who hasn't committed any "High Crime and Misdemeanor" You want to believe what you are being told because of nothing but pure hatred for Trump's personality. It really is sad to see so many focused on someone who has done absolutely nothing to hurt them or their families. Ukraine wouldn't even be an issue if it weren't for Trump. Watch the next three days and get back to us, if you dare!

Has even one single challenge made by any republican senator to the facts that have been established? No, not one. They all know everything that was proven is truth. They can't argue with the truth they can only argue about the process.

What we're going to be hearing from the defense isn't refutation of fact, no. It's going to be what the US did in Guatemala, what the US did with Germany, blah blah and deflect to anything and everything that has nothing whatsoever to do with the crimes.

 

[Conservative]

Trump is damned by his own words. His acting chief of staff admitted it. And so did his personal lawyer.

LOL, apparently you see everything through your partisan socialist point of view none of which resonates with the American people. Your ideology and you are out of touch with the American people who will never support the removal of a President based upon those articles of impeachment and no evidence of a high crime and misdemeanor. You actually believe minds are being changed by the partisan politics of personal destruction?

 

[Conservative]

Has even one single challenge made by any republican senator to the facts that have been established? No, not one. They all know everything that was proven is truth. They can't argue with the truth they can only argue about the process.

What we're going to be hearing from the defense isn't refutation of fact, no. It's going to be what the US did in Guatemala, what the US did with Germany, blah blah and deflect to anything and everything that has nothing whatsoever to do with the crimes.

Republicans are just starting their defense which of course doesn't resonate with you. Everything has been proven to be true?? Really? where is the violation of law in the articles of impeachment?

 

[HumblePi]

You are right, I like most Americans have no interest in this as we all know that it is trumped up material based upon hatred and total fabrication Abuse of Congress?? LOL, you think a political biased party is capable of making an non partisan claim of abuse of power? that is the courts responsibility, not Congress. Your party is a joke and as the poll numbers show, you don't have the American support and it is going to be a long 5 more years for you

As an American, you should be interested. You should watch it all. You should want to know the facts. But that's your problem. People that want to know the truth will watch and will form an opinion from the facts not from someone's mouth only because they said so.

 

[Conservative]

Has even one single challenge made by any republican senator to the facts that have been established? No, not one. They all know everything that was proven is truth. They can't argue with the truth they can only argue about the process.

What we're going to be hearing from the defense isn't refutation of fact, no. It's going to be what the US did in Guatemala, what the US did with Germany, blah blah and deflect to anything and everything that has nothing whatsoever to do with the crimes.

The problem remains, there is no evidence of any high crime and misdemeanor only partisan politics of personal destruction. You have to understand that this trial is going to lead to acquittal then what for you? What is the next issue you are going to attack Trump on to divert from the very poor candidates and lack of issues from the Democratic Candidates?

 

[Conservative]

As an American, you should be interested. You should watch it all. You should want to know the facts. But that's your problem. People that want to know the truth will watch and will form an opinion from the facts not from someone's mouth only because they said so.

As an American I know politics of personal destruction are not a winning strategy to win over the American people, the polls are showing that. I have no interest in any Democratic witch hunt that has nothing to do with me, my family or the country. There was no personal gain received by Trump and Ukraine wouldn't be an issue if it wasn't for personal hatred of Trump. He had the authority to fire any Ambassador at any time for any reason. You have no understanding of leadership and the responsibilities of leadership

 

[eohrnberger]

As an American, you should be interested. You should watch it all. You should want to know the facts. But that's your problem. People that want to know the truth will watch and will form an opinion from the facts not from someone's mouth only because they said so.

Only problem with that is the constant stream of fiction from Schiff and his co-managers.

I'm with Conservative on this one, the US electorate, at least those who have been paying attention, have already correctly come to the conclusion that this impeachment is little more than politics. Smear and dirty Trump to increase the chances of a Democrat candidate winning the presidential, cause fractures in the Senate, perhaps take the Senate and maintain the House.

All those goals are exactly what political parties are supposed to do, but I can't agree with or support how the Democrats are going about doing them, i.e. the impeachment. But I understand why the did, because they have little else and an extremely weak presidential candidate field, and are trying to deal with a civil war within their party between the establishment coalition and the extremest leftist coalition. Guess what. Looks like the extremest leftist's are going to win this one.

So this entire impeachment process is little more than politically driven kabuki theater.
Any claim the the Democrats as to 'protection the constitution' is just so many lies and spin from them.

And this is what I think the electorate's conclusion is (cautiously optimistically).

Sure, you can disagree with some or all of it, but that doesn't change my opinion on it.

 

[Parrish]

And now there is a video that shows 45 and others. Hmmm.

 

[uptower]

Parnas has never been identified as a Trump aide.

From the reports, Yovanovitch didn't question Trump...she tried to undermine Trump. Firing her is not obstruction.

You’re kinda right, firing her was part of the plot because she was undermining his corruption. The obstruction came later.

 

[Anthony60]

Oh, just coerced a foreign country to interfere with our election, that's all. He simply asked a foreign government under attack by Russia to help get dirt on his political opponent in order to sway votes to himself. And, oh yes, he obstructed justice multiple times with a false claim of 'executive privilege' in order to stifle testimonies or to show documents that would prove his guilt.

That's the president of the United States doing everything the Founding Fathers feared.

Oh, but Trump released the transcript, to Pelosi & Schiff's surprise. So, it's clear that he did nothing wrong. But, I see you are still swallowing their lies, and ignoring the transcript, like they want you to. But, hearsay, and Schiff's completely made up version of the call, now you'll believe that. Nice and obedient, just like a big government likes you to be.

 

[marke]

Has even one single challenge made by any republican senator to the facts that have been established? No, not one. They all know everything that was proven is truth. They can't argue with the truth they can only argue about the process.

What we're going to be hearing from the defense isn't refutation of fact, no. It's going to be what the US did in Guatemala, what the US did with Germany, blah blah and deflect to anything and everything that has nothing whatsoever to do with the crimes.

The democrat's two strongest witnesses, opinions and hearsay, prove democrat bias, not Trump guilt. No evidence of a threat exists except in the biased minds of the accusers who assume Trump's intent, about which nothing actually said or done poves their assumptions. In a real court under actual American law, the prosecution has no case. But, the democrats also have a whole pile of hearsay which supports their assumptions about Trump's intent, none of which, however, can be allowed under real laws in a real courtroom.

 

[Deuce]

What evidence, lies, distortions, out of context remarks all to get rid of a President who hasn't committed any "High Crime and Misdemeanor" You want to believe what you are being told because of nothing but pure hatred for Trump's personality. It really is sad to see so many focused on someone who has done absolutely nothing to hurt them or their families. Ukraine wouldn't even be an issue if it weren't for Trump. Watch the next three days and get back to us, if you dare!

Yeah, that's pretty much how I thought you'd respond. You're not going to do as I suggested. Have a nice day.

 

[Conservative]

Yeah, that's pretty much how I thought you'd respond. You're not going to do as I suggested. Have a nice day.

Thank you very much and it has been a great day!what is your next witch hunt going to be now that you've lost the impeachment debate?

Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk

 

[Deuce]

Thank you very much and it has been a great day!what is your next witch hunt going to be now that you've lost the impeachment debate?

Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk

I haven't lost any debate. Were you under the impression that the outcome of impeachment was ever in doubt? :lamo

 

[HumblePi]

Which aide was he talking to? At that dinner?

He was talking to former White House aide John DeStefano,

 

[Atomic Kid]

Oh well. :shrug:

Never was a claim that Trump had class when firing people.
Heck, I remember that Comey got the word on broadcast TV, rather than how he should have, i.e. in person.

Sometimes Trump is his own worst enemy, as people who've been fired like this are sure to hold grudges.

Baked in the cake, at this point.

Oh well? If the President of the United States went out of his way to publicly insult and make implied threats against your wife in the absence of any provocation you would just shrug and say; 'oh well'?

 

[HumblePi]

The democrat's two strongest witnesses, opinions and hearsay, prove democrat bias, not Trump guilt. No evidence of a threat exists except in the biased minds of the accusers who assume Trump's intent, about which nothing actually said or done poves their assumptions. In a real court under actual American law, the prosecution has no case. But, the democrats also have a whole pile of hearsay which supports their assumptions about Trump's intent, none of which, however, can be allowed under real laws in a real courtroom.

Trump is saying he cannot be prosecuted while in office under the Justice Department’s memo, and neither can he be impeached because he can withhold the most compelling evidence. If ever there were evidence that he has his eye on absolute, unchecked power, this would be it. Article One : Abuse of power.

 

[Bullseye]

Trump is saying he cannot be prosecuted while in office under the Justice Department’s memo, and neither can he be impeached because he can withhold the most compelling evidence. If ever there were evidence that he has his eye on absolute, unchecked power, this would be it. Article One : Abuse of power.

How is exercising Constitutional rights "abuse of power"?

 

[Michael Cole]

So then the ranting would be the President didn't follow protocol!!!! He's a DICTATOR!!!

I doubt Jeff Bezos personally fires a night shift manager at an Amazon Prime shipping center either.

I'm sure you're right about Bezos. As well, I'm sure I'm right that Bezos doesn't fire anyone whose name he doesn't know, based on a rumor from someone else he doesn't know.