Svensmark Closes the Loop -- The Missing Link Between GCR's, Clouds and Climate

[Jack Hays]

lol

Now you're linking to 3-month old articles from a climate denier think tank? Or is this your idea of "influence on scientists?"

View attachment 67231536

It's a fine article.

 

[Jack Hays]

Solar
[h=1]Solar activity crashes – the Sun looks like a cueball[/h]Right now, the sun is a cueball, as seen below in this image today from the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) and has been without sunspots for 10 days. So far in 2018, 61% of days have been without sunspots. Via Robert Zimmerman, Behind The Black On Sunday NOAA posted its monthly update of the solar cycle, covering…

 

[Jack Hays]

 

[Surface Detail]

The failure of the anonymous creator of this graph to spell Fröhlich's name correctly indicates that accuracy may not have been his or her primary concern.

 

[Jack Hays]

The failure of the anonymous creator of this graph to spell Fröhlich's name correctly indicates that accuracy may not have been his or her primary concern.

"Froelich" is the approved spelling when working with a font without an umlaut. Maybe you don't travel much.

 

[Threegoofs]

"Froelich" is the approved spelling when working with a font without an umlaut. Maybe you don't travel much.

In other words, the font was more important than facts.

 

[Surface Detail]

"Froelich" is the approved spelling when working with a font without an umlaut. Maybe you don't travel much.

No, it isn't. That would be "Froehlich".

Attention to detail is important in science, and whoever created this graph is clearly lacking in that department. Do you know who created the graph, by the way, or are you simply taking it on trust from some denier blog?

 

[Jack Hays]

In other words, the font was more important than facts.

It's common practice.

 

[Jack Hays]

No, it isn't. That would be "Froehlich".

Attention to detail is important in science, and whoever created this graph is clearly lacking in that department. Do you know who created the graph, by the way, or are you simply taking it on trust from some denier blog?

Reference: Judith Lean, “Evolution of the Sun’s Spectral Irradiance Since the Maunder Minimum”, Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 27, No. 16, Pages 2425-2428, August 15, 2000.

 

[Surface Detail]

Reference: Judith Lean, “Evolution of the Sun’s Spectral Irradiance Since the Maunder Minimum”, Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 27, No. 16, Pages 2425-2428, August 15, 2000.

The graph does not appear in that paper. Indeed, the graph couldn't possibly appear in that paper, given that the paper was published in 2000 while the graph extends to about 2010.

So who created the graph?

 

[Jack Hays]

The graph does not appear in that paper. Indeed, the graph couldn't possibly appear in that paper, given that the paper was published in 2000 while the graph extends to about 2010.

So who created the graph?

The graph appears in the Comments section in this post. It is offered by "aveollila." It appears first as presented here, then again in more elaborated form. It is the second appearance that is accompanied by the source citation.


An interview with Henrik Svensmark: cosmic rays, clouds and climate

Prof Henrik Svensmark & Jacob Svensmark discuss the connection between cosmic rays, clouds and climate with the GWPF’s Benny Peiser and Jonny Bairstow from Energy Live News after his recent presentation in London. Video and slideshow follow. See his slideshow: Prof Henrik Svensmark & Jacob Svensmark: The Connection Between Cosmic Rays, Clouds and Climate. (pdf) Presentation in…

March 16, 2018 in Clouds, Cosmic rays.

 

[Jack Hays]

Solar radiative output and its... (PDF Download Available)

https://www.researchgate.net/.../226227567_Solar_radiative_output_and_its_variability_...
Dec 19, 2017 - on climatological and solar-evolution time scales the irradiance database acquired thus. 280 C. Fröhlich, J. Lean. far is extremely short. This has motivated the development of variability models that. reconstruct past irradiance changes, based on understanding the sources of variability. evident in the ...

 

[Jack Hays]

Solar
It appears Solar Cycle 25 has begun – Solar cycle 24 one of the shortest and weakest ever

Evidence of a Cycle 25 sunspot found In our previous post: Solar activity crashes – the Sun looks like a cueball, Our resident solar physicist, Dr. Leif Svalgaard commented and provided a link to something reported by his colleagues, something that likely would not have been possible without the fantastic solar observations of NASA’s Solar Dynamic…

 

[Threegoofs]

The graph does not appear in that paper. Indeed, the graph couldn't possibly appear in that paper, given that the paper was published in 2000 while the graph extends to about 2010.

So who created the graph?

LOL,

I’m dying of laughter here...

 

[Jack Hays]

LOL,

I’m dying of laughter here...

Not sure why. None of this changes the data.

 

[Lord of Planar]

"Froelich" is the approved spelling when working with a font without an umlaut. Maybe you don't travel much.

Just proves the ignorance of the deniers of science.

 

[Lord of Planar]

No, it isn't. That would be "Froehlich".

Attention to detail is important in science, and whoever created this graph is clearly lacking in that department. Do you know who created the graph, by the way, or are you simply taking it on trust from some denier blog?

Not by my six years of living in Germany. The "h" is not required.

 

[Jack Hays]

lol

Now you're linking to 3-month old articles from a climate denier think tank? Or is this your idea of "influence on scientists?"

View attachment 67231536

• “Researchers who actively push their papers on social media gain more citations,” reports Rachael Pells. (Times Higher Education)

 

[Surface Detail]

Not by my six years of living in Germany. The "h" is not required.

The man's name is "Fröhlich", spelt with an "h", so of course the "h" is required. If it is not possible to represent an umlaut, an "e" may instead be inserted after the vowel in question, so ö becomes oe. But we don't do anything with h's! In summary: "Froehlich" is an acceptable alternative way to represent "Fröhlich", while "Froelich" is simply a misspelling.

N.B. "Fröhlich" means happy or content in German - quite a pleasant surname to have!

 

[Jack Hays]

The man's name is "Fröhlich", spelt with an "h", so of course the "h" is required. If it is not possible to represent an umlaut, an "e" may instead be inserted after the vowel in question, so ö becomes oe. But we don't do anything with h's! In summary: "Froehlich" is an acceptable alternative way to represent "Fröhlich", while "Froelich" is simply a misspelling.

N.B. "Fröhlich" means happy or content in German - quite a pleasant surname to have!

I'm glad that's settled.

 

[Threegoofs]

I'm glad that's settled.

It is settled.

And it shows your source is, as usual, ****ty.

 

[Jack Hays]

It is settled.

And it shows your source is, as usual, ****ty.

Actually, it doesn't have anything to do with anything except spelling.

 

[Lord of Planar]

The man's name is "Fröhlich", spelt with an "h", so of course the "h" is required. If it is not possible to represent an umlaut, an "e" may instead be inserted after the vowel in question, so ö becomes oe. But we don't do anything with h's! In summary: "Froehlich" is an acceptable alternative way to represent "Fröhlich", while "Froelich" is simply a misspelling.

N.B. "Fröhlich" means happy or content in German - quite a pleasant surname to have!

OK, I didn't know the "h" was part of the name. It is common practice to replace the "ö" with "oe." I thought you were replacing the "ö" with "oeh."

 

[Jack Hays]

OK, I didn't know the "h" was part of the name. It is common practice to replace the "ö" with "oe." I thought you were replacing the "ö" with "oeh."

I too missed the "h" and my German is still pretty good.

 

[Jack Hays]