- Joined
- Dec 9, 2009
- Messages
- 134,496
- Reaction score
- 14,621
- Location
- Houston, TX
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
I'm right already. What's confusing you here?
You say, based on nothing, it'll cost more than promised. I can point to it coming in hundreds of billions dollars below what was promised, not to mention generating hundreds of billions more in savings than anticipated.
You say, based on nothing, it does nothing to improve quality. I can point to numerous leaps in quality it's achieved already.
You're waving your hands and reiterating your bump sticker slogans. I'm pointing to actual results already being achieved. All you talk about is intent, I'm talking about results.
Yes, you believe you are right but what you cannot explain is why we need ACA to correct the healthcare problem in this country. Do you support what MA did? If so why not let the other states do the same thing? You want a federal bureaucracy that has created the current 18.2 trillion dollar debt most of which is due to social engineering. Why doesn't that resonate with you?
Keep spouting the talking points of a program that hasn't been fully implemented and when it is and it fails what say you then? Have you ever admitted being wrong?