- Joined
- Dec 23, 2009
- Messages
- 16,881
- Reaction score
- 2,980
- Location
- virginia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Private
Race Bannon and Dr. Quest. Great cartoon.
It figures.:smileyfart
Race Bannon and Dr. Quest. Great cartoon.
Does this mean me because I am incorporated.
BTW, it's also still illegal for a corporation (or anyone else) to spend money to help a candidate outside the contribution limits. For instance, if a candidate says to a corporation "you go run this ad to support me" it's illegal.
Don't be coy. I think you have some idea of the size of the war chest required to run for the house or senate.Because they can't afford the filing fee? That doesn't make any sense.
Don't be coy. I think you have some idea of the size of the war chest required to run for the house or senate.
If you can afford the filing fee, you can be on the ballot. If you require corporate money to get on the ballot, than you are probably indigent.Don't be coy. I think you have some idea of the size of the war chest required to run for the house or senate.
How are you going to prove it?
It figures.
What figures? The fact that it was better than your Pokemon cartoons and....is that a cat with your every post? Ever owned a dog? Like Bandit?
To prove that this is illegal you mean?
There you go again!:2razz:
circles :spin:
:surrender:surrenderNo, it was just a question to clarify what you mean. Are you asking me to prove this is illegal? Do you have some other point?
No but I owned a junkyard once and had a dog that looked like you.
:surrender:surrender
Never mind. You're a troll.
Please come to the basement to the "idiot thread" please.
I am outta here. this debate is getting off topic.:3oops:
It takes hundreds of thousands of dollars to run a viable campaign for a congressional seat. Some Repubs have described this ruling as a boon for non-incumbents. But which potential candidates will be likely to benefit? You can be certain that it won't be someone with views similar to that of Ralph Nader(for example). So, the process will winnow out certain political views- even more than it already does, that is.If you can afford the filing fee, you can be on the ballot. If you require corporate money to get on the ballot, than you are probably indigent.
Don't be obtuse.
It takes hundreds of thousands of dollars to run a viable campaign for a congressional seat. Some Repubs have described this ruling as a boon for non-incumbents. But which potential candidates will be likely to benefit? You can be certain that it won't be someone with views similar to that of Ralph Nader(for example). So, the process will winnow out certain political views- even more than it already does, that is.
Please come to the basement to the "idiot thread" please.
I am outta here. this debate is getting off topic.:3oops:
Never mind. You're a troll.
I love it when Liberals fight each other...........
Moderator's Warning: |
Stop the trolling. Calling people trolls also needs to stop. This is also trolling. Report posts that you think are trolling. |
A) In other words, it does not keep people off the ballot. You declaring that it would is nothing more than useless hyperbole.It takes hundreds of thousands of dollars to run a viable campaign for a congressional seat. Some Repubs have described this ruling as a boon for non-incumbents. But which potential candidates will be likely to benefit? You can be certain that it won't be someone with views similar to that of Ralph Nader(for example). So, the process will winnow out certain political views- even more than it already does, that is.