Obvious Child,
The capacity to read and understand the written English language eludes a great number of DP users and if you don't know what linear regression is, don't talk about economics.
Forget about understanding variability, correlation and the like, let's talk about basic English, and understanding it.
Gingrich did not research, write the study or submit the study rejected because the conclusion was known and not original.
Gingrich is irrelevant.
Meaningless.
Not of import.
No influence.
What matters is the study came to a so repeated and obvious conclusion it wasn't worthy of publishing.
.the top academic energy journal, aptly named, ``The Energy Journal,'' recently rejected a study by economists Morris Coats and Gary Pecquet of Nicholls State University in Louisiana that found that higher production in the future would reduce prices today.
The first ****ing line too boot! Everything you need to know about who and what.
Shall I repeat it again?
Maybe... you're not... deceitful and deceptive? ....Hmmm (in B-flat)?
But I see he Gingrich gets you excited.
So much so you go blind to the facts in front of your face.
Gingrich, Gingrich, Gingrich.
Feel better now?
How about Halliburton?
Bush 43?
Cheney... oh I bet that really gets you going.
Yes. I did eliminate Gingrich... because...
testing, testing, testing...
Gingrich is irrelevant.
Meaningless.
Not of import.
No influence.
The study was rejected. Too common. Not original. They knew this.
All in the quote I published.
Amazing Grace folks!
You just proved everything I stated about you in one thread.
Thanks. I'll call this One-stop-shopping.
Everything you need to know in one thread.
Now for me... the thread is dead... the thread is dead.
.