- Joined
- Jan 31, 2010
- Messages
- 31,645
- Reaction score
- 7,598
- Location
- Canada, Costa Rica
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I have no problem with that one way or the other. End them. Fine.
But I will say this, if there was ever a reason to have a subsidy it would be for alternative energy, mostly because this is a long term national problem. But, like I said, cut them all out.
Do you feel that it was always the American government who encouraged and subsidized energy in the United States and without government involvement the people would have a problem finding a solution?