- Joined
- Feb 1, 2010
- Messages
- 88,782
- Reaction score
- 39,683
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
The prosecutor has quite well explained himself. His intent was to allow ALL that claimed they saw things to testify. That includes the woman that admitted she lied to the police about being there and had just repeated a story she had heard from her boyfriend who ALSO hadnt seen the incident. That includes the woman who claimed to have seen the shooting when later it was proven by her testimony there is no way she could see the shooting unless of course she had both telescopic AND x-ray vision.My reply above fits with several recent posts on this thread
WHY are those who think Michael Brown died during a justified cop killing unable to actually respond to the topic of this thread - The prosecutor knowingly violated the legal code under which he is supposed to act - WHY?
A grand jury is not supposed to hear "ALL the evidence" particularly when the evidence is known to be false.
Again...why do YOU ignore the fact that people representing both sides were allowed to testify to the grand jury and why do YOU insist on ONLY focusing on the account that disagrees with you.
Ya know...you really DONT have to answer that...