Special counsel Robert Mueller to make statement Wednesday on the Russia probe, his first public com

[Plasmaball]

The claim is that the rationale, thinking that Trump conspired with Russia, is the problem.

Indeed, in his address that aspect was downplayed. He made it seem like he was needed to probe Russian interference. But that had already begun to be probed. There is no reason to think it could not have continued under the Trump Administration, except for the suspicion that the Trump campaign conspired in those Russian sources.

Mueller wrapped up by saying the most part of his investigation was that he found Russia was messing with the election.
He is wrong: the most important part of his investigation is that he found that the president was not involved with it.

That's not what the report or Mueller says

 

[Plasmaball]

Barr was right; Mueller reiterated again what he said in his report and what Barr accurately stated: that Mueller drew no conclusion about obstruction.

That's not true at all

 

[Plasmaball]

Because, since there was no underlying crime, the president's actions could be entirely legitimate.

That's not how it works

 

[Plasmaball]

no underlining crime and you wanna remove a President for something he "may have" wanted to do which was fully within his power?

doesn't seem like a strong case to make to American people imo

If he was in his power then why did nobody listen to him?

 

[Plasmaball]

and when it exposes the bias underbelly of our law enforcement agencies...you shall be proved wrong

It was all in the report..you think barr is gonna see something Mueller did not?

 

[Plasmaball]

From Mueller's report,

"The evidence does not establish that the termination of Comey was designed to cover up a conspiracy b/t the Trump campaign and Russia [b/c] the investigation did not establish that the president or those close to him were involved in the charged Russian computer-hacking or active-measure conspiracies, or that the president otherwise had an unlawful relationship with any Russian official."

Yes and why is that? You are leaving out context...
You know like how they lied,deleted emails, or use chats that erased the context.

If you are gonna use the Mueller report as evidence..make sure you are doing it in a honest manner

 

[American]

the FBI and DOJ disagree with your conclusion

No they don't. BTW you're late to the party, boy.

 

[justabubba]

House Judiciary Hearing on Lessons from Mueller Report, Part 1 | C-SPAN.org
House Judiciary Hearing on Lessons from Mueller Report, Part 2 | C-SPAN.org

the hearing was quite informative
the focus of red vs blue was more than stark

 

[justabubba]

No they don't. BTW you're late to the party, boy.

then show us the illegality as presented by the FBI/DOJ

 

[American]

then show us the illegality as presented by the FBI/DOJ

That's coming. Stand by.

 

[justabubba]

That's coming. Stand by.

according to your ouija board

again confirming that facts are things anathema to tRump supporters