Yes, in the midst of a general rise in the standard of living it's a great thing.
A standard of living so good certain foodstuffs had to be rationed and tens of thousands were thrown in concentration camps.
Sovereign currency issuers cannot default.
Are you really trying to argue that's the end all and there's no other problems that might arise from just making more money?
You argued that they weren't equivalent because China has a larger population, or something like that which made no sense. Why is 10% growth over decades reasonable for China but unreasonable for any other country?
It amazes me how on one hand you display a more than rudimentary understanding of economics yet utterly refuse to accept the facts in front of you.
Germany's GDP growth was unsustainable because of the way it was happening, which was driven by massive government spending. It was based on the Reich spending billions of marks on rearmament, which required a major expansion of it's industrial base to do so and as a result GDP skyrocketed and unemployment dropped.
China's GDP growth has been driven by it's government taking advantage of it's large pool of cheap labor to become a major manufacturer of consumer goods which are then exported across the world. China makes money off of this, and then uses that excess revenue to further refine it's industrial base and export market therefore keeping growth going.
Since this has been explained to you countless times by now and your only excuse is denial you have no reason to not understand this, but I'll repeat it anyway.
Germany also earned money by exporting manufactured goods, but after rearmament German exports dropped as resources were focused on rearmament. Germany also imported vital materials it couldn't get from anything else; textiles and rearmament, Germany's largest employers between 1933-1939 were nearly entirely reliant on imports. But the collapse of Germany's foreign exchange (since all the money was being used to buy raw materials for rearmament) and the depletion of it's reserves meant that Germany could no longer pay for the imports it needed.
It doesn't take a genius to figure this out, so you have no excuse for why you don't understand it. If Germany can't pay for those imports it's major industries have to shut down and those millions of Germans return to the unemployment line. When faced with this inevitable problem you offered halfassed solutions that would've done nothing. German agricultural management had already drive off half a million farmers and farm hands, and there's hardly any more space for more farms. The service sector isn't anywhere big enough to accommodate that many people, and there's no other industry big enough to handle the influx of millions of workers.
And really the whole nail in the coffin is that Germany's own economic ministers realized the problem they were facing and were shut down when they brought it up. And yet you insist that it's some big mystery as to what would've happened when Germany ran out of the resources to function as a modern nation.
