- Joined
- Apr 28, 2015
- Messages
- 104,733
- Reaction score
- 95,470
- Location
- Third Coast
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Alright, don't kick me too hard when I'm down. I will concede I misread the graph. I assumed it represented Q3 numbers, not realizing those were annual numbers and I had to manually scroll over it for Q3. But again, these numbers do not include the DNC either.Good god man, DIG DEEP for some remaining shred of integrity. I'll use your source.
Tom Steyer led the Democrats this quarter, raising $49.6 million total, of which 4.1 percent was raised from individual donors and 95.9 percent came from his own wallet. That total is $21.6 million more than Bernie Sanders, who came in second with $28.0 million.
$49.6 million plus $28 million IS NOT greater than $125 million.
However, if we scroll further down the article, we see the YTD funds for Trump is 97.8M, whereas the YTD funding for the aggregate Dem field is 435M. Now I will admit this last diagram does not aggregate the candidates with their national party, and the reference is for the YTD. But we're looking at over a 440% difference between Trump and the Dem candidates, here.
Now where this really gets dicey, is with outside money. In the same section I just quoted, the article claims the Dem fund outside fundraising site, ActBlue, raised 3B! It does not specify a corresponding GOP outside source, but it's clear the outside sources, at least from what we see with the Dems, dwarf's the candidates' funding.
But since we're playing this game, I think we need to examine the specific monies received by the parties & candidates. Are they large donations from few? Or small donations from many? There's a difference. The article touches on that aspect too, if we want to get into it.