That is unfortunate, but I don't think it's fair to solely blame Michelle Obama for these choices. Where it may have been her steps to push schools into creating healthy menu styles, I still haven't seen, directly from her, the ruling that certain states are to completely ban brought in lunches. Maybe that particular Chicago school itself chose those drastic measures? If that is the case then maybe that was that schools first step towards correcting their current problem? Do I agree that parents shouldn't be able to send their children to school with their own lunch, no? Do I think that a lot of parents are uninformed and manipulative and are willing to put their own children's health aside to send them to school with a terribly crappy meal just to "stick it to Michelle Obama for being a selfish, 'Sweet Potato Pie, fine wines at every White House function, Kobe beef for their guests, extravagant desserts that most salivate over that would never meet her hypocritical agenda of what she calls 'healthy'"? Absolutely.
You understand she is the First Lady of the United States of America, right? You get that it would be impolite of her to serve anything less than "extravagant foods that most people would salivate over" to her guests at the White House, right? You understand that there is also at least one White House chef that is creating these meals and that she herself is not in the kitchen coming up with these dishes and laughing maniacally over the fact that there are "starving children all across this country" because she is trying to change that foods that are offered to them at schools and encourage a more active lifestyle, right? ... Because I really don't think you get that. It actually seems to me that you moreso just really hate her husband, and therefore her, and scrutinize everything they do and then hate it just for the sake of hating in, instead of really paying attention that what and who you are hating. That's a shame.