- Joined
- May 27, 2019
- Messages
- 2,163
- Reaction score
- 310
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Us having this conversation via the internet is thanks to democratic socialistic practices in the US
If tax payer money didn’t fund the infrastructure and technology - there would be no internet.
I’m not a socialist. But I do see the value in democratic socialist practices and think the US needs MORE of it because unfettered capitalism ALWAYS screws the little guy.

“Under a just and equal Government, every individual is entitled to protection in the enjoyment of the whole product of his labor, except such portion of it as is necessary to enable Government to protect the rest; this is given only in consideration of the protection offered. In every bounty, exclusive right, or monopoly, Government violates the stipulation on her part; for, by such a regulation, the product of one man’s labor is transferred to the use and enjoyment of another. The exercise of such a right on the part of Government can be justified on no other principle, than that the whole product of the labor or every individual is the real property of Government, and may be distributed among the several parts of the community by government discretion; such a supposition would directly involve the idea, that every individual in the community is merely a slave and bondsman to Government, who, although he may labor, is not to expect protection in the product of his labor. An authority given to any Government to exercise such a principle, would lead to a complete system of tyranny.” Representative Giles, speaking before Congress on February 3rd, 1792
Your love affair with socialism does not protect the property each has in their own labor. Instead, it takes from the most productive and redistributes it to the politically well connected.