• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Simple Question on Gun Registration.

Does common sense restriction on hate speech restrict it? Answer the question.

No it doesn't. People still take over streets screaming Pigs in a blanket, fry 'em like bacon, and We want dead cops do not seem restricted.
 
No. A straw sale means it is purchased for another person. You do not need to find out if he is a criminal or not. And therein lies the problem

No, a straw purchase is the intentional purchase of a firearm illegally for a prohibited person. Registration does nothing to stop these crimes.
 
You BELIEVE he currently has a valid CCW. You do not know that for sure

I know that he does. I can also ask to see it. Do you not trust your friends and family to not be hidden criminals?
 
No, a straw purchase is the intentional purchase of a firearm illegally for a prohibited person. Registration does nothing to stop these crimes.

You are simply playing semantics. You can not know if someone is an allowed person unless they get a BC
 
I know that he does. I can also ask to see it. Do you not trust your friends and family to not be hidden criminals?

You can ask to see it. That does not mean it was not revoked yesterday
 
You BELIEVE he currently has a valid CCW. You do not know that for sure

What's that supposed to mean?

I've transferred dozens of weapons to my son, after they were transferred to me by my father. I'm pretty sure my son has a CCW, Equally as sure my father didn't. But it doesn't matter. Both transfers were legal.
 
What's that supposed to mean?

I've transferred dozens of weapons to my son, after they were transferred to me by my father. I'm pretty sure my son has a CCW, Equally as sure my father didn't. But it doesn't matter. Both transfers were legal.
They should not be. You may trust your family but I don't or trust you. I don't know you
 
They are accomplished the exact same way

A straw purchase involves a buyer going to a gun shop, filling out a form, passing a background check and selling it deliberately to a prohibited person. Form, background check, registration, everything you want and it still involves getting a gun in the hand of a prohibited person. None of your "solutions" would slow down this transaction at all. Every single straw purchase involves at least two felonies.

Private sales may or may not involve prohibited persons. We don't care as a society if two good guys transfer guns. We know that transfers between bad guys will ignore any registration or background check requirement, as they are already committing multiple felonies. The best way to prevent good guys selling to bad guys is to give them direct access to NICS. Good guys that are willing to go to an FFL for a transfer would also be willing to use an NICS app; private sellers that would never require a background check from a buyer won't care either way, but some buyers who feel that going to an FFL is too expensive and/or time consuming will use a free, instant app to check out a potential buyer.
 
They should not be. You may trust your family but I don't or trust you. I don't know you

I don't trust you not to molest kids. I don't know you. Can the state now exercise prior restraint? Heck we know that NICS is an incomplete database and plenty of prohibited persons aren't in that database. We should require complete FBI security investigations for each private sale, just to be sure.
 
A straw purchase involves a buyer going to a gun shop, filling out a form, passing a background check and selling it deliberately to a prohibited person. Form, background check, registration, everything you want and it still involves getting a gun in the hand of a prohibited person. None of your "solutions" would slow down this transaction at all. Every single straw purchase involves at least two felonies.

Private sales may or may not involve prohibited persons. We don't care as a society if two good guys transfer guns. We know that transfers between bad guys will ignore any registration or background check requirement, as they are already committing multiple felonies. The best way to prevent good guys selling to bad guys is to give them direct access to NICS. Good guys that are willing to go to an FFL for a transfer would also be willing to use an NICS app; private sellers that would never require a background check from a buyer won't care either way, but some buyers who feel that going to an FFL is too expensive and/or time consuming will use a free, instant app to check out a potential buyer.

I do not like this system based on me trusting you are a good guy. No thanks. The honor system is ridiculous and defeats the entire purpose
 
I do not like this system based on me trusting you are a good guy. No thanks. The honor system is ridiculous and defeats the entire purpose

It would save lives.
 
I don't trust you not to molest kids. I don't know you. Can the state now exercise prior restraint? Heck we know that NICS is an incomplete database and plenty of prohibited persons aren't in that database. We should require complete FBI security investigations for each private sale, just to be sure.

I don't trust that you are a citizen. If you come back into the US from abroad I will not take your word for it. I will expect that you have filled out a long application that results in a background check and paid expensive fees for that passport
 
Mine would save more lives

Debatable, but yours will never happen. Direct access to NICS could already have been in place, saving lives. Thanks for nothing, Democrats.
 
Debatable, but yours will never happen. Direct access to NICS could already have been in place, saving lives. Thanks for nothing, Democrats.

We could be arresting people who lie on the BC form already. Thanks Trump. LOL
 
We could be arresting people who lie on the BC form already. Thanks Trump. LOL

Thanks, every president since the law was enacted, and every Congress who failed to fund the ATF since the law was enacted.
 
How are you not getting this. The original buyer can sell it to someone now and not even know his name. There is no way to trace it. Registration and UBC's solves that

How are you not getting this? Forcing law abiding citizens to spend money, take up their time, and jump through all the hoops you want in place, will not be followed by criminals any more than they do now.

Criminals don't go to gun shows where there are several LEO and seek out that lone person in the back booth selling daddies old guns. Criminals buy guns from other criminals. Criminals don't seek out civilians selling a couple guns, look them up, and make the purchase. They buy guns from other criminals.

It's a better idea to register criminals.
 
Thanks, every president since the law was enacted, and every Congress who failed to fund the ATF since the law was enacted.

Yeah....but's its Trump's fault today. LOL
 
How are you not getting this? Forcing law abiding citizens to spend money, take up their time, and jump through all the hoops you want in place, will not be followed by criminals any more than they do now.

Criminals don't go to gun shows where there are several LEO and seek out that lone person in the back booth selling daddies old guns. Criminals buy guns from other criminals. Criminals don't seek out civilians selling a couple guns, look them up, and make the purchase. They buy guns from other criminals.

It's a better idea to register criminals.

Who did the criminals get the guns from in the first place? Are you saying they stole ALL of them? LOL
 
You are not understanding that now in a private sale you do not even need to find out if you are selling to a criminal or not

Actually you do.

I understand more than you ever knew.

Firearms owner for 70 years.
Small arms analyst for 3 years courtesy of the Army.
CCW holder for years. Current owner of a couple or so weapons.
Attended more than a few gun shows.

And you?
 
They should not be. You may trust your family but I don't or trust you. I don't know you

What should they not be? My relatives?

You realize you are making no sense?

Probably not.
 
What should they not be? My relatives?

You realize you are making no sense?

Probably not.

Sorry I don't know you. This honor system idea is laughable
 
Actually you do.

I understand more than you ever knew.

Firearms owner for 70 years.
Small arms analyst for 3 years courtesy of the Army.
CCW holder for years. Current owner of a couple or so weapons.
Attended more than a few gun shows.

And you?

Former gun owner and ten years active duty military. Then you know what I am saying is factually correct
 
Back
Top Bottom