- Joined
- Apr 25, 2010
- Messages
- 80,422
- Reaction score
- 29,077
- Location
- Pittsburgh
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
It was a direct, word for word quote.
sure was and then your interpretation of it was 100% wrong and a bold face lie lol
how you could even try to act like they were the same speaks volumes
Assertions are not argument. You need to make an actual argument for why my point is not relevant. Simply asserting the same thing over and over again is pointless.
There was no appeal to emotion. If a father abandons his part in providing financial support for the child it will have a negative impact on the child.
The argument is that nobody said abandoning a child will have zero effect LOL you made that nonsense up.
and the other argument is that forced child support on people that dont want to be parents does little to nothing in reality in the majority of cases.
BS! You are trying to change what I said to mean "emotional abandonment." I was not talking about emotional abandonment. Child support does not address that, so within the context of the discussion it should have been quite clear that I was talking about abandoning their financial responsibility.
100% wrong again
first you misinterpreted what people were saying by making up some out right lie then you made a blanket statement about your lie.
There was no context because you had everything wrong:shrug: lol
not my fault you made a blanket statement and was wrong?
It's unfortunate that you need everything spelled out for you and are not able to glean understanding from context. But that is your problem.
this is just a failed insult because you are trying to save face instead of just maning up and admitting you misspoke, no biggie though the proof is in this thread LMAO
LMAO here you go again making stuff up and adding qualifiersYes, it does. The abandonment effects the child in two ways. Emotionally and financially. The point of child support is to diminish the financial effects of the abandonment. Civil action has little ability to do anything about the emotional damage.
Child support IF it comes will be meaningless with all the programs a mom can get into.
You seem to be confused, we are talking about poeple who do not want to be parents lol the whole point of the thread.
Emotionally they arent going to be there ALREADY
Financially they arent going to be there ALREADY
the impact in the majority of cases will be nil.
No in a case where a person WANTS to be a parent sure it helps because not only will there be the little bit of money a month provider there will be MORE than that money.
That is NOT what we are talking about we are talking about people who dont want to be parents.
You can't sue your business partner for being a bad friend. You can sue him for failing to meet his financial responsibilities under the partnership agreement.
really? thanks for that info but it holds no merit in this conversation
What?
what Im saying is that people that dont want to be parents dont give a crap about civil actions, they will just be dead beat parents. Just the reality we live in :shrug:
You deal in incoherent bs without any argument to support your positions.
another failed attempt to insult because you know you have nothing of merit and are failing to deal in reality. This is a typical tactic when people have nothing left.
again Forcing child support on people that dont want to be parents in the majority of case will have little to no effect. I see proof of this every day, sadly its just how it is.