:roll:
You are blatantly ignoring the actual real world fact that "gender ≠ sex."
Yes, you are. You are ignoring the fact that HE has actual reasons, which in many cases likely has a biological/neurological dimension, to be classified as a man.
No, it isn't.
1) There may well be biological/neurological reasons for the individual's extreme discomfort.
2) Biological sex doesn't have much impact on one's height or weight. It has almost no impact on one's attitudes and general disposition, and in fact such claims are vastly overstated, cherry-picked and otherwise deeply flawed. (See
Gender Mosaic by Daphna Joel, | Hachette Book Group for more information on that point)
Again: Transgender individuals are not denying biological facts. A transgender person is often
painfully aware of the mismatch between specific elements of their biology, and how they experience their own gender.
Your attempts to trivialize this, basically just so you can disrespect those individuals with impunity, only show your own prejudices and biases.
No one is asking you to be blind to anything. We're telling you to recognize the reality that gender ≠ sex.
You're disrespecting the individual's identity. Every post you're making in this thread is permeated with that disrespect. I assure you, it's not a good look for you.
Odd, it looks like the same story to me -- that story being "code1211 wants to disrespect people without any consequences."
Nor is it clear which "actions" you are required to change -- it's not like there is any cost or consequences to you when you use the correct (i.e. respectful) gender pronouns for a transgender individual. It's pretty clear this is not about some massive unfair burden on you, it's about your desire to marginalize and disrespect transgender individuals with impunity.
:roll:
1) There is no evidence that "age dysphoria" is a genuine issue.
2) Your proposals are obviously made in bad faith, and you're fooling no one on that score.