• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Science says there were no hijackers on 911

Quag said:
Why do you think Pin is going on and on about a question that has been answered multiple times, its a diversion.
Click to expand...

Don't know. It is a method used by other posters. Only post questions. Never give a detailed response to questions asked. Never provide sources that back up their position.
Post some long vid without posting timestamp info that may support their position.

I have said before, nothing new in the world of 9/11 CT. All theses years and not one concise alternative explanation for controlled demolition. When pressed for explanations, it is always well the govt was wrong.
 
tick, tack tick tack
 
mike2810 said:
Don't know. It is a method used by other posters. Only post questions. Never give a detailed response to questions asked. Never provide sources that back up their position.
Post some long vid without posting timestamp info that may support their position.

I have said before, nothing new in the world of 9/11 CT. All theses years and not one concise alternative explanation for controlled demolition. When pressed for explanations, it is always well the govt was wrong.
Click to expand...

Heck not even 1 actual piece of evidence to back their claims
 
gamolon said:
The same people you referred to as "they" in your previous post.
Click to expand...

it really seem people here are unable toi answer. well, it is what it is.
 
Pin dÁr said:
it really seem people here are unable toi answer. well, it is what it is.
Click to expand...
"We" is referring to the same group of people you just referred to as "some people". Simple really.
 
gamolon said:
"We" is referring to the same group of people you just referred to as "some people". Simple really.
Click to expand...

Dont bother, it has been answered many times. This is just a diversion to avoid answering the question I asked him.
 
We????
 
TheGoverness said:
Me?????
Click to expand...

Ever notice that "Me" is just "We" with the "M" rotated 180 degrees or better stated an upside down "M":lamo

It is no longer interesting that some posters will not answer questions asked of them. It has become better than comics. The days of serious discussion regarding 9/11/2001 is gone.

For those who do not believe in the fire induced collapse of WTC1,2,7. Please provide a link to the one concise explanation for what happened to the buildings.
 
mike2810 said:
Ever notice that "Me" is just "We" with the "M" rotated 180 degrees or better stated an upside down "M":lamo

It is no longer interesting that some posters will not answer questions asked of them. It has become better than comics. The days of serious discussion regarding 9/11/2001 is gone.

For those who do not believe in the fire induced collapse of WTC1,2,7. Please provide a link to the one concise explanation for what happened to the buildings.
Click to expand...

They need to include evidence in that explanation ad well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom