ad-homonyms are not an argument.
FACTS are though
I am not against gays having all the same rights as married couples, neither is Jerry and we have both in this thread stated as much. I am against the redefining of marriage, period. So you can think what you like but it is not true.
not only is it true, its a FACT, you are against gay marriage therefore you are against equal rights for gays. You want to discriminate against them. Therefore you are not for gay rights and no matter how bad you want to spin things to make yourself feel better about discriminating against them fellow americans the facts wont change. LMAO again just more blind blatant dishonesty from you.
What part of "you can think what you like" are you missing?
didnt miss anything ,I focused on the where you told her IT DOESNT MATTER lol the nerve of you, you are not gay its not your decision PERIOD lol to think otherwise makes you look VERY foolish
She is one individual that makes up part of the movement. She is no more the movement than I am the civil rights movement. No one person represents the whole as we are all different.
I agree PART and that one movement is made up of ALL the parts so what she says goes and is fact and what you say is MEANINGLESS, you act like she is the ONLY one that feels they way she does, like she is an anomaly. What a joke LMAO again it was just you saying something totally ridiculous and making a totally inaccurate blanket statement. How arrogant and misguided could you possibly be, you now make decisions for her and a movement you have nothing to do with LOL.
Your rhetoric is not much better than blanket statements and assumptions.
Says the guy who says HE knows what all gays think and feel and what thier movement is about LMAO Nice try this is purely you projecting because its exactly what you did, assumptions and blanket statements, only problem is GAYs agree with ME and not with you LOL
I have had and do have many gay friends. So I am not speaking for anyones motives in particular. I am however pointing out an obvious motivation for members of the movement. I have also not said this is good or bad one way, but I don't agree with it.
I don't know who that is back peddling but you can think what you like.
HAHAHAHAHAHA You sound like the racists that say, "I have a black friend" you most certainly did and tried to and are 100% wrong. You made a blanket statement and then tried to say oh I just meant the movement which STILL doesnt apply
I never said you did? Notice the lack of quotation marks. You did however imply that a single person or two IS the movement. You further qualified my assumption with your "she IS the gay movement along with all on her side." Inferring that because she is part of the movement, her opinion is somehow more valid? :lol:
you were wrong last post and you are wrong again because thats not what I did at all LMAO you Assumed.
and yes the fact is her opinion IS more important to the movement because she is gay genius LMAO YOURS is MEANINGLESS.
You are not gay and against gay rights, she is gay and for them so YOU don't get to tell HER what she is fighting for nor people like her, something like that is NEVER your call and NEVER will be. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Wow just wow :roll:
:lamo