sanman
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2015
- Messages
- 12,088
- Reaction score
- 4,686
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Wrong answer, guy. You're expecting me to "prove a negative", which is impossible - it's a logical fallacy.
OHHH - but Trump is somehow expected to prove a negative - ie. prove that he didn't collude with Russia!!
That's why the burden of proof is always on the prosecution and not on the defense. The onus is on YOU to prove that there are other nations putting as much effort as Russia is to influence our elections...and there is NO evidence that any other nations are doing so.
You mention China - yeah, they do present a threat...but the threat they present is NOT against our democratic process. Yes, they are trying to steal our secrets - and Russia did too (remember the Rosenbergs? That's how they go the plans to build their own hydrogen bomb). But threatening our democratic process and inserting a candidate of RUSSIA's choosing - that's a clear and present danger to our nation's very sovereignty since they now have THEIR puppet in charge of OUR nuclear arsenal. No other nation has ever come close to that...but Russia has done it, and YOUR side is defending them for having done so.
Prove to me that China has less of an interest in interfering in the US political system than Russia does.