• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Russia Says It Told U.S. Where In Syria It Was Allowed To Bomb

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
110,557
Reaction score
100,768
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Russia Says It Told U.S. Where In Syria It Was Allowed To Bomb

now-vladimir-putin-is-angry-with-donald-trump.jpg


April 20, 2018

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has claimed that Moscow dictated where U.S., British and French forces were allowed to attack in the weekend's airstrikes on suspected Syrian chemical weapons facilities, Sky News reported. Coalition forces destroyed three storage and production sites in response to an alleged April 7 chemical attack on civilians that killed at least 40 people in the rebel-held city of Douma, near Damascus. Russia, which supports Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, denies that a chemical attack took place. Investigators from the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons are trying to reach Douma to establish what happened, but are struggling to gain access.

According to Lavrov, Russia had been in contact with the coalition in the days leading up to the attack, dictating its “red lines” beyond which airstrikes would be considered unacceptable. Russian officials had previously warned that any attacks on Syrian territory would result in Russian retaliation. The U.S. and Russia use a so-called “deconfliction” telephone line communication channel to avoid accidental clashes in Syria. The country has become a congested war zone, where multiple nations are fielding forces to pursue differing interests. It is likely the line was used in the run-up to the weekend’s attacks, but for the two sides to be discussing the acceptability of specific targets would be unusual.

I wonder if Trump had to say 'Please'.

The Kremlin is slapping the US around in public with all manner of propaganda and disinformation, but the only sound from Washington is crickets.
 
It was obvious from the photos that we spent millions to level empty buildings.
This was just wag the dog moment.
 
It was obvious from the photos that we spent millions to level empty buildings.
This was just wag the dog moment.

So the question is, what did Trump cover up during this amazing spectacle? My guess is we find out within the next month.
 
Do you believe them?

Why, or why not?

We have to believe them when it makes Trump look bad...but we are also supposed to disbelieve them when they say anything else.

Funny, isn't it?
 
They actually told them where to NOT bomb so Russians weren't killed....

And this is bad because?
It's bad because we accomplished nothing. We gave them time to empty the targets and move all chemicals and equipment.

A one hour warning would have been sufficient. Best just by dropping flyers. Let the people get away.
 
We have to believe them when it makes Trump look bad...but we are also supposed to disbelieve them when they say anything else.

Funny, isn't it?

Did you see the pics of the rubble? The only debris was concrete.

This was one big was of money, a multi million dallor Target exercise...
 
It's bad because we accomplished nothing. We gave them time to empty the targets and move all chemicals and equipment.

A one hour warning would have been sufficient. Best just by dropping flyers. Let the people get away.

We blew up a lab and storage facilities.

While they may rebuild they wont be doing so right away.

CLUE: Many bombing runs in WWII did nothing but temporarily interrupt or decrease production. Guess they were all failures as well.
 
Do you believe them?

Why, or why not?

I don't believe them any further than I can throw a cheesecake under water. Of course I have the same standard for our administration.
 
We blew up a lab and storage facilities.

While they may rebuild they wont be doing so right away.

CLUE: Many bombing runs in WWII did nothing but temporarily interrupt or decrease production. Guess they were all failures as well.

We blew up empty buildings.we gave them time to move their equipment, we interrupted nothing.
 
Do you believe them?

Why, or why not?

The Trump Admin hasn't denied it. Like I said, crickets when it comes to Putin and Russia.

The only one with any chutzpah is Nikki Haley.
 
We blew up a lab and storage facilities.

While they may rebuild they wont be doing so right away.

CLUE: Many bombing runs in WWII did nothing but temporarily interrupt or decrease production. Guess they were all failures as well.

The WWII bombing runs were regular and consistent. That's what made them effective. A one time bombing won't have much effect.
 
The Trump Admin hasn't denied it. Like I said, crickets when it comes to Putin and Russia.

So, to be clear, that's a yes, you do believe the Kremlin?

Why?
 
They actually told them where to NOT bomb so Russians weren't killed....

And this is bad because?

There's a mutual deconfliction telephone line.

The US can inquire if need be. No need to be told by the Kremlin.

The Kremlin didn't worry about or warn US troops when Russians attacked a US-held oil field last month.
 
But were the strikes failures because they were only temporary in effect?

No, because the targets would be hit again and again. The effectiveness was based on consistent repetition, not a one time event.
 
But were the strikes failures because they were only temporary in effect?

Strategic failures, yes. It Trumps strikes were strategically successful, there would be no need to strike, rinse, and repeat.
 
Your OPINION is noted. On what do you base this OPINION?



Delayed time frame, previous reports that we were in contact with Russia about avoiding Russian troops and equipment.

Photos of the site with only concrete, no twisted metal, ( barrels, desks, chemical tanks,etc..).
 
Delayed time frame, previous reports that we were in contact with Russia about avoiding Russian troops and equipment.

Photos of the site with only concrete, no twisted metal, ( barrels, desks, chemical tanks,etc..).

So they moved the desks from the lab? Really?

And you were trained in battle damage assessment when?

Rubble is there because that happened when a facility is destroyed.

As far as "barrels, desks, chemical tanks,etc." please share which photos you have. The ones I have sees were not clear enough to make such things out.
 
Oh so NOW you trust Russia..........

:lamo

Leftists....
 
But were the strikes failures because they were only temporary in effect?


No it was a failure because we gave them around a weeks warning, time to evacuate and move the facilities.
 
Back
Top Bottom