Restaurant owner refuses to serve blacks any longer

[marke]

I'm way more concerned with the stupidity being shown by the Republican Party by continuing to allow that obviously mentally ill disgrace to do nothing while the country's lack of a plan to fight Coronavirus spirals into catastrophe. He needs to be removed from office under the 25th Amendment before he kills hundreds of thousands more people! Under Section 4 they would have no problem, considering his obvious dereliction of duty due to mental deterioration/inability to perform reasonable duties to protect the citizens of the United States during a pandemic. There would be ample medical professionals that would attest to this fact. Otherwise, this is his shooting someone on 5th Avenue and no one will do anything about it X 140,000+. Shame on this government to allow this to go on this long!

It would be a big mistake to replace Trump with unhealthy old crooked politician who is losing his mind, even if Trump helped Cuomo cause COVID deaths to skyrocket by not forcing him to use the hospital ships he sent to New York for them to use instead of bombing nursing homes with COVID patients.

 

[marke]

Hillary learned as she grew up.

What’s your excuse?

I never really got increased personal benefit from the wisdom of God until I repented of my sins and asked Jesus to save me.

 

[Threegoofs]

I never really got increased personal benefit from the wisdom of God until I repented of my sins and asked Jesus to save me.

Seems like it hasnt clicked, TBH.

 

[element94]

It would be a big mistake to replace Trump with unhealthy old crooked politician who is losing his mind, even if Trump helped Cuomo cause COVID deaths to skyrocket by not forcing him to use the hospital ships he sent to New York for them to use instead of bombing nursing homes with COVID patients.

Way more are going to die than in those nursing homes if Trump isn't removed.

 

[marke]

Way more are going to die than in those nursing homes if Trump isn't removed.

How so? Don't repeat that lying opinionated assumption. It is plainly stupid and rabidly partisan.

 

[Stealers Wheel]

He cannot take a stand against rioting and looting baboons while the police have been disbanded? I disagree.

Then he needs to put up a sign saying he doesn't serve "rioting and looting baboons." But the moment he refuses service to anyone because they are not white, he will find his ass in a court, and he will lose. I know you don't like it, but it is settled law.

 

[Stealers Wheel]

The NRA newsletter is fake news .......

Actually, I went on Yelp to read reviews of this place. Very few and mixed ... until recently and all of a sudden he is getting rave reviews on his awesome "wangs" but none of the recent reviews are from people in the Little Rock area. Sounds very suspicious to me.

 

[marke]

Then he needs to put up a sign saying he doesn't serve "rioting and looting baboons." But the moment he refuses service to anyone because they are not white, he will find his ass in a court, and he will lose. I know you don't like it, but it is settled law.

Take his ass to court and let the media follow the arguments. I think most Americans will side with him because they know the dummass rioters, looters and murderers are in the wrong, are giving blacks a bad name, and are causing Americans to fear and suspect the sanity and stability of blacks in general.

 

[Stealers Wheel]

Take his ass to court and let the media follow the arguments. I think most Americans will side with him because they know the dummass rioters, looters and murderers are in the wrong, are giving blacks a bad name, and are causing Americans to fear and suspect the sanity and stability of blacks in general.

That is not an argument any court will hear. It is completely irrelevant to matter at hand.

When I was 15, a nineteen year-old decided I needed my ass kicked and did it himself. My father pressed charges and the 19 year-old was arrested. In court he said he didn't need a lawyer (the court strongly advised him otherwise) and he tried to argue that I deserved that ass kicking. The prosecutor objected on the grounds it was irrelevant and the objection was sustained. When the defendant persisted, the court again admonished him that he needed legal counsel. Again he refused and told the court that where he was from (Texas) when two guys had a difference, they went behind the barn and settled it like men. The judge explained that we were not in Texas and in this state the people frown on adults assaulting minors and "he had it coming" was not a valid defense in this case. Since the facts were not in dispute, he was convicted and sentenced on the spot.

It is the same thing here. If he refuses service on the basis that someone is not white, he will be convicted. "I was justified in refusing service to black citizens" will not be heard. I guarantee it.

 

[marke]

That is not an argument any court will hear. It is completely irrelevant to matter at hand.

When I was 15, a nineteen year-old decided I needed my ass kicked and did it himself. My father pressed charges and the 19 year-old was arrested. In court he said he didn't need a lawyer (the court strongly advised him otherwise) and he tried to argue that I deserved that ass kicking. The prosecutor objected on the grounds it was irrelevant and the objection was sustained. When the defendant persisted, the court again admonished him that he needed legal counsel. Again he refused and told the court that where he was from (Texas) when two guys had a difference, they went behind the barn and settled it like men. The judge explained that we were not in Texas and in this state the people frown on adults assaulting minors and "he had it coming" was not a valid defense in this case. Since the facts were not in dispute, he was convicted and sentenced on the spot.

It is the same thing here. If he refuses service on the basis that someone is not white, he will be convicted. "I was justified in refusing service to black citizens" will not be heard. I guarantee it.

When I was 17 a friend and I were walking along the Galveston beach late at night and a car load of young men (19 - 31 years old) pulled up and we ended up surrounded with nobody else in sight. The good old boys had been drinking and since my friend had long hair they decided to harass us because, they said, they did not like surfers. Never mind the fact that we were not surfers. We got assaulted and they left. I encouraged my friend to go with me to track them down in their car after they left.

The good old boys were arrested and charged with assault. My friend and I drove 300 miles one way to Galveston 3 times to scheduled court dates which kept being put off. When the trial finally took place 5 of them got off with no sentence and one got fined $50 for hitting me in the face with his fist. The boys, their lawyer and the good old local judge were all happy and that ended the case.

About 10 years later one of those good old boys accidently shot and killed a store owner's son in a drunken robbery attempt, for which he was later executed. I suspect he would have been better off if he had not been let off so lightly by a friendly local judge in our case and been taught a lessen which may have helped him in the future..

 

[element94]

How so? Don't repeat that lying opinionated assumption. It is plainly stupid and rabidly partisan.

It's OK for you but not for me? That's not very fair of you.

 

[Stealers Wheel]

When I was 17 a friend and I were walking along the Galveston beach late at night and a car load of young men (19 - 31 years old) pulled up and we ended up surrounded with nobody else in sight. The good old boys had been drinking and since my friend had long hair they decided to harass us because, they said, they did not like surfers. Never mind the fact that we were not surfers. We got assaulted and they left. I encouraged my friend to go with me to track them down in their car after they left.

The good old boys were arrested and charged with assault. My friend and I drove 300 miles one way to Galveston 3 times to scheduled court dates which kept being put off. When the trial finally took place 5 of them got off with no sentence and one got fined $50 for hitting me in the face with his fist. The boys, their lawyer and the good old local judge were all happy and that ended the case.

About 10 years later one of those good old boys accidently shot and killed a store owner's son in a drunken robbery attempt, for which he was later executed. I suspect he would have been better off if he had not been let off so lightly by a friendly local judge in our case and been taught a lessen which may have helped him in the future..

Well, that's Texas for you.

 

[BrotherFease]

Take his ass to court and let the media follow the arguments. I think most Americans will side with him because they know the dummass rioters, looters and murderers are in the wrong, are giving blacks a bad name, and are causing Americans to fear and suspect the sanity and stability of blacks in general.

Marke, do you support the Piggie Park decision? Based on your comments above, I think you would oppose it.

 

[marke]

Marke, do you support the Piggie Park decision? Based on your comments above, I think you would oppose it.

I don't know anything about it.

 

[BrotherFease]

I don't know anything about it.

You should look it up. It explains why you agree with the store owner.

The Supreme Court case involved a chain of drive-thru BBQ restaurants called Piggie Park. The owners of the restaurants were White Supremacists and believe it was against their sincere religious beliefs to serve black Americans.

The courts looked at whether or not, religious beliefs can trump the 1964 civil rights laws concerning discrimination and segregation according to race and color.

SCOTUS ruled against the Piggie park owners. My guess is that you opposed the decision, and believe that businesses have the right to discriminate against race and color.

Having a business deny customers service based on color and race, contradicts our civil rights laws. It's a pretty fundamental concept and why so many posters are calling you out on it.

 

[marke]

You should look it up. It explains why you agree with the store owner.

The Supreme Court case involved a chain of drive-thru BBQ restaurants called Piggie Park. The owners of the restaurants were White Supremacists and believe it was against their sincere religious beliefs to serve black Americans.

The courts looked at whether or not, religious beliefs can trump the 1964 civil rights laws concerning discrimination and segregation according to race and color.

SCOTUS ruled against the Piggie park owners. My guess is that you opposed the decision, and believe that businesses have the right to discriminate against race and color.

Having a business deny customers service based on color and race, contradicts our civil rights laws. It's a pretty fundamental concept and why so many posters are calling you out on it.

This case is not about racism towards blacks. It's about rejection of black racist and lawless narratives and violence by groups using Black Lives Matter as an excuse to rob others, to loot their stores, to burn their stores down, to shoot their owners, to take over government properties and force Americans to support their violation of the civil rights of others and so forth. I agree with the store owner. If blacks refuse to stand up and openly and forcefully condemn such barbarian violence and abuse then blacks can stay the hell out of the guy's store.

And if it was my store I would also ban wimpass white democrats who didn't have the wisdom or courage to condemn the BLM violence either.

 

[BrotherFease]

This case is not about racism towards blacks. It's about rejection of black racist and lawless narratives and violence by groups using Black Lives Matter as an excuse to rob others, to loot their stores, to burn their stores down, to shoot their owners, to take over government properties and force Americans to support their violation of the civil rights of others and so forth. I agree with the store owner. If blacks refuse to stand up and openly and forcefully condemn such barbarian violence and abuse then blacks can stay the hell out of the guy's store.

And if it was my store I would also ban wimpass white democrats who didn't have the wisdom or courage to condemn the BLM violence either.

Actually it is. The store owner, according to you, refuses to serve black customers.

 

[marke]

Actually it is. The store owner, according to you, refuses to serve black customers.

Good. Some people burn down stranger's businesses after looting them in order to promote change. This guy is telling blacks they are not welcome in his store because of widely accepted black violence among the black community. I prefer the black store owner's approach to promoting a stop to the violence.

 

[Lovebug]

The owner will find his racist ass in Federal court very soon.

That can't be, blacks can be racist?

the black owner of a chicken restaurant in Little Rock,

edit
amazingly, you got so many "likes"

 

[Lovebug]

Actually it is. The store owner, according to you, refuses to serve black customers.

Have you checked the link?

the black owner of a chicken restaurant in Little Rock,

 

[TheParser]

My deepest sympathies to the owner of that restaurant.

It must be horrible to become terrified every time certain people come in and you think they want to rob and/or kill you.

Of course, I assume that it is illegal to refuse service based on ethnicity.

It is a tragedy that some people cannot act properly but just want to cause trouble and hurt people.

I guess that the owner will have to close his business.

Things will continue to get worse when it comes to crime in this country, IMHO.

 

[ultmd]

I never really got increased personal benefit from the wisdom of God until I repented of my sins and asked Jesus to save me.

He cannot take a stand against rioting and looting baboons while the police have been disbanded? I disagree.

:roll:...the words of an angry bigot, hiding behind the pretense of his "faith".

There seems to be just a weeee bit of a "disconnect" between these two statements.

Yeah...I'm not sure what kind of Believer you are, or what Bible you read...In fact, I'm pretty sure you are about as familiar with your Bible as your Dear Furhrer Trump is with any of the Bibles he occasionally borrows to use as props.

But hey, what do I know, huh? I'm just an ACTUAL Christian, and an ACTUAL Black man, who knows all-to-well how The Bible has always been used (and debased) by ignorant, racist, white Pseudo-Christian types who have neither the moral, nor the intellectual chops to otherwise justify their views and behavior. You know there is no Scriptural defense of your bigotry, but you don't care because your bigotry is more important to you than your professed faith.

The most Un-Christian Christians are the bigots, racists and misogynists who think God doesn't see them.

But the "Good News" for bigots like you, is clear. If you possess half the faith that you profess, you and I both know what lays ahead for you...and that you can't escape it, because I doubt you would ever repent sincerely.

 

[marke]

Actually it is. The store owner, according to you, refuses to serve black customers.

Would to God there were more blacks who sent a message to the black community like this guy did by saying he would no longer serve blacks for their general lack of condemnation for black racism and violence.

 

[marke]

:roll:...the words of an angry bigot, hiding behind the pretense of his "faith".

There seems to be just a weeee bit of a "disconnect" between these two statements.

Yeah...I'm not sure what kind of Believer you are, or what Bible you read...In fact, I'm pretty sure you are about as familiar with your Bible as your Dear Furhrer Trump is with any of the Bibles he occasionally borrows to use as props.

But hey, what do I know, huh? I'm just an ACTUAL Christian, and an ACTUAL Black man, who knows all-to-well how The Bible has always been used (and debased) by ignorant, racist, white Pseudo-Christian types who have neither the moral, nor the intellectual chops to otherwise justify their views and behavior. You know there is no Scriptural defense of your bigotry, but you don't care because your bigotry is more important to you than your professed faith.

The most Un-Christian Christians are the bigots, racists and misogynists who think God doesn't see them.

But the "Good News" for bigots like you, is clear. If you possess half the faith that you profess, you and I both know what lays ahead for you...and that you can't escape it, because I doubt you would ever repent sincerely.

I oppose violent mobs who want to destroy Christianity and capitalism in America.





Convention.
Joe Biden calls for Christians to be added to terror watch list for opposing LGBT abuse of children


The SPLC has already classified most Christian groups as “hate” groups, and thus “terrorist” groups. Biden would essentially crystallize this classification at the public level so as to make it the law of the land – meaning Christianity would effectively be criminalized under a Biden administration, just like Christianity and other religions are already criminalized in communist China.

 

[W_Heisenberg]

Marke, there appears to be a persistent theme throughout all the threads you're creating.