• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Republicans are urged to return their own scandal-engulfed major donor's money

Fletch said:
It seems equal to me, but did anyone actually return Weinstein money? Pouring money into the bank accounts of creeps like this seems a bit strange, no? Its almost like rewarding them for their bad behavior.
Click to expand...

The difference for me would be if Weinstein has denied the allegation as Wynn has.
 
sangha said:
Or pedophilia

When Al Franken was accused of sexual harrassment, Dems forced him to resign. When Roy Moore was accused of pedophilia, he got a presidential endorsement and money from the RNC.

So what are the odds any repub is going to return Wynn money?
Click to expand...

When Franken admitted to sexual harassment he resigned.

When Moore was accused with no proof, he did not drop out.

If you are going to post at least try to keep it honest.
 
poweRob said:
I agree... I would feel like **** if I wrote a handsome check out to Weinstien at this point.
Click to expand...

Give the money to charities. And as some of the funds were used/distributed in various districts, make it in that district/State.
Question is, how far back does one go?
 
Threegoofs said:
‘No proof’

LOL.

Whatta hack!
Click to expand...

Here we go again.

First of all you need to look up the definition of the word proof, then come back and show us anything that fits that description.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom