- Joined
- Mar 11, 2006
- Messages
- 96,116
- Reaction score
- 33,462
- Location
- SE Virginia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Some anonymous sources in the White House, DOJ, and the IRS confirmed it.
What??? The WH confirmed it? :lol:
Some anonymous sources in the White House, DOJ, and the IRS confirmed it.
What leads? Um, specific groups and individuals associated in the attack which multiple agencies are tracking.
You really needed me to explain that to you?
"The CIA agreed with the concerns raised by the State Department and revised the talking points to make them less specific than the CIA's original version, eliminating references to al Qaeda and affiliates and earlier security warnings."
Yeah, you have no obligation to back up anything, but the point still stands, you choose not to, ergo it is funny to see you whining about "objectivity" when you can't point to any objective evidence for your silly claim.
What??? The WH confirmed it? :lol:
tell us what other group would be interested in modifying them to spin the story against the white house
Altering emails is inexcusable, and anyone with any kind of ethical standard or who values the truth at all would agree with me there. Benghazi has become so covered in political bull**** that most people are never going to know the truth and problems which led to the situation won't get fixed as lawmakers are more worried about what they can turn Benghazi into for the next election. You know who gains from all this political mudslinging? The ignorant, the partisan, and politicians. Everyone else loses, including those people who are still in this dangerous places.
Tell me how does altering emails make people safer? How does blaming Obama 24/7 and spending barely a moment to consider how to actually fix the problem, make anyone safer? No one is talking about how to solve a problem, everyone is talking about who to blame the problem on because politics means more than American lives to most people in both parties. Susan Rice talking about a spontaneous attack when there's mortars involved is damn stupid, and that's inexcusable as well.
Stop worrying about blame, start worrying about solutions and then and only then you might actually do some good with all the noise people are making over this issue, until then it just cheapens and degrades the deaths of those men.
Altering emails is inexcusable, and anyone with any kind of ethical standard or who values the truth at all would agree with me there. Benghazi has become so covered in political bull**** that most people are never going to know the truth and problems which led to the situation won't get fixed as lawmakers are more worried about what they can turn Benghazi into for the next election. You know who gains from all this political mudslinging? The ignorant, the partisan, and politicians. Everyone else loses, including those people who are still in this dangerous places.
Tell me how does altering emails make people safer? How does blaming Obama 24/7 and spending barely a moment to consider how to actually fix the problem, make anyone safer? No one is talking about how to solve a problem, everyone is talking about who to blame the problem on because politics means more than American lives to most people in both parties. Susan Rice talking about a spontaneous attack when there's mortars involved is damn stupid, and that's inexcusable as well.
Stop worrying about blame, start worrying about solutions and then and only then you might actually do some good with all the noise people are making over this issue, until then it just cheapens and degrades the deaths of those men.
:shock:
PICKET: (AUDIO) Father of killed Navy SEAL - Hillary told me she would have filmmaker 'arrested and prosecuted' - Washington Times
Creator of anti-Islam film arrested on probation violation; held without bail | abc7.com
Your credibility is shot. I'm done doing your work.
The solution is obvious, send lots of Marines. Next.
I haven't pushed a thing. Now your adding projection to your subjectivity. The only thing I did was question why the GOP would alter something that is so easily refuted.
I've also posed a question about the veracity of the WH, given the same anonymous sources.
Yes, exactly.Could someone please point out where it says the Republicans altered the emails? I can't find it.
Right. It was THE STATE DEPARTMENT that wanted those points scrubbed even though the FBI had signed off on them. That's called "political spin" and it's the core of the coverup which constitutes the SCANDAL we are discussing.
Hey look, someone altered the story and blamed a video. We must get to the bottom of this!
You do realize that Issa has a criminal history don't you?
I guess not. Too much rightwing TV!
GOP Head Of Oversight Has Criminal Past | Addicting Info
Could someone please point out where it says the Republicans altered the emails? I can't find it.
According to Woodward actually
Quote me where I said "Watergate wasn't that serious" and while you're at it, show in these emails where the connection is made to a youtube video. Remember Obama and Hillary told the grieving families while they stood next to the coffins containing their loved ones they were killed because of a youtube video. The poor schmuck that created that youtube video still rots in prison today.
Do you care about the Americans killed in benghazi whose deaths could have been prevented? Do you care that your Government whose JOB was to protect them failed and then LIED to their faces?
Yes or No
Wow, prosecutions for parole violations was really the "full weight of the US govt"....and "hunting him down".:shock:
PICKET: (AUDIO) Father of killed Navy SEAL - Hillary told me she would have filmmaker 'arrested and prosecuted' - Washington Times
Creator of anti-Islam film arrested on probation violation; held without bail | abc7.com
Your credibility is shot. I'm done doing your work.
They altered evidence? Are you claiming they photoshoped emails? Please explain how emails from the WH are altered. If emails are alterable, then who's to say the emails released by the WH weren't altered?
Poorly executed deflection.
Read the article, get educated, report back in.
Meanwhile given Issa's criminal past, he must be the first suspect who needs to be investigated.
GOP Head Of Oversight Has Criminal Past | Addicting Info
This where we part, I don't see (as did the CIA and Petraeus) that removing specific references to suspected terrorist groups from press releases WHILE investigations are still being conducted as being "spin" or "cover up", I call it common sense.
Again, Petraeus stated this was not done for political reasons, ie, not "spin".
Wow, prosecutions for parole violations was really the "full weight of the US govt"....and "hunting him down".
I did read, thus my question, which you can't answer since you decided to make Issa the subject. So now he's a criminal? So you're trying to say Obama is in good company or what?