conquer
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2006
- Messages
- 964
- Reaction score
- 69
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Nah, since you offered no evidence or science that hasn't been debunked, that is how I win debates with the likes of you.
...
...
If all you are going on is Leutcher, then you've got nothing. Leutcher has been shown to be a fraud. He has no degree in science or engineering and has no qualifications to make the claims that he does. This has been exposed in a court of law. Further, at the Zundel trial, Leutcher showed what an idiot he is by not understanding exposure times or concentrations of the gas used. so nothing you say in reference to Leutcher is anything but lying, bigotted, holocaust denial.
What a clown!
Look son, a young and amateur astronomer observed that the rotation of Venus was so slow as it is the duration of the orbit of earth around the Sun and he wrote his papers and gave them to the journal. And Carl Sagan, the showman who called himself "the expert" (with scientific degrees) laughed of the young guy, saying that his observations were a complete nonsense.
And guess what?...well, if you know the history of the events, the young guy was right and Carl Sagan was dead wrong.:lol:
So, your argument that Leutcher has no scientific degrees means sh*t in this discussion, because regardless of his degrees, he is right, and his method of analyzing, evaluating and obtaining conclusions are following all the requirements established by the scientific method.
So, we are here discussing the fact that no gas was used in the rooms because no gas residual enough was found and because the obvious leaks of gas would happen in such great gaps between windows and doors in reference of their frames...but you have not provided a single evidence to prove your assumptions that those were gas chambers...the only input from your part is a bunch of lies of several assumed witness and a lot of propaganda.
So, I ask you, I beg you, I implore you to stop writing such invalid arguments and that finally you show the scientific evidence that gas was used and that those rooms fit to be used as gas chambers.
Look now son, the patience of many is getting lose because you still refusing to provide such an evidence. If you correct as you say you are, then explain with the proper scientific background that gas cannot leak through those gaps between windows and doors in those concentration camps rooms.
If you cannot do so, then all your arguments saying that gas chambers were used in concentrations camps must go to the "conspiracy theory" forum, because those are no more than conspiracy until you present the correspondent evidence.
This topic can stay here because it is a fact that the Pope took away the sanction to the priest, it is a fact that the priest said that no holocaust happened, and it is a fact that Leutcher was wise enough to use science against assumed witness saying lies.
Everybody knows about the propaganda about those gas chambers, so you don't need to mention such an argument anymore in this discussion, because now we have passed to the next step already, we know what you believe in, not it is time for you to prove that what you believe can be shown with experimental data and observation, this is to say, it is time for you to present your position based in science.
In essence. Leutcher is a fraud, his science is not science in the least. Leutcher is not evidence in this debate. Either come up with something else, or cease posting these lies. If you cannot, I will move this thread to where your lying places it: the Conspiracy Theory Forum. That's the extent of the credibility that both you and Leutcher have.
So, since you cannot use Leutcher, what else have you got?
Again, having your child comparing what brand of 4 grams of cereal floats longer in a cup of milk at 30F temperature at the sea level, such is science. Actually, anyone can base any argument using science but you and the supporters of the holocaust! ...ha, ha, ha, ha....
Using the example here, you have a child proving -after several tries- that such brand of cereal floats longer than this and that brands of cereals..You can't say that the conclusions of the child are not valid because he lacks of scientific degrees...because if that is the case, then you must be joking or a lunatic by arguing that way.
Leutcher doesn't need to be a graduated scientist in order to be credible as same as your child doesn't have to be one either in order to validate his evaluations and conclusions, because as long as Leutcher followed the required steps of the scientific method, all his evaluations and conclusions about the lab results, measurements and needs to build a gas chamber are correct. Remember that he is an expert building gas chambers, and his points are valid because he use scientific background to obtain the conclusions of his observations.
It is clear that your intentions to move this thread to conspiracy theories is because your impotence to confront the reality which cries loudly that such rooms in the concentration camps can't ever be used as gas chambers.
So, go ahead as the bad loser, use what you have to manipulate the information about the truth, you are not the first one who is doing it, because like you, several blind mind dudes cannot accept reality too and they ban the messengers or move the threads so people cannot be properly informed of the reality of the situation.
You can avoid all such a shame just by proving your position with scientific background, but, I know that you will prefer to move this thread because no science can support the lies that gas chambers were used in the Nazi's concentration camps. :coffeepap