:naughty
Wrong!
The facts are in my favor.
That is why I am laughing at your postings and your attempt to be dishonest.
You keep saying "I" like it means something. It doesn't.
What you provided was wrong. Get over it.
What is funny, is that I edited before your reply. What is funny, is that you didn't pay attention to it.
What is funny, is that
we are arguing what you quoted anyways because of your failure to admit that you were wrong by virtue of what you provided,
and you apparently don't realize it. Do'h!
What is funny, is that you already know I had clarified my posting, yet went with the unedited version anyways.
What is hilarious, is you getting all undone over someone asking you "really"?
Bottom line is, what you provided was wrong because Shelli lied. She never saw a firearm.
Get over it.
Maybe next time when you are asked "really", you will understand that means that there is other information out there that you should make yourself aware of, instead of deflecting with all your absurdities.
:doh
Your allegations were false, so of course my denial means something.
But since you want to falsely suggest otherwise, lets go over them.
1.) Already showed that was was wrong, and where you failed because you didn't pay attention to the times when the comments to the article were provided.
The rest you only provided links and not quotes. I wonder why that is?
I figure it is because you know you are making false allegations. Because
I did ask questions in the first three, and the last was just a continuation of the conversation here, which came after the "If statement. Which of course would be already understood as carrying forward by anybody capable of following along. Duh!
Two separate arguments dude! Neither bare on the other. I wasn't hiding.
Nor could I be hiding as I already knew his statement was true. Which apparently you don't understand.
You are failing on several fronts here.
I did post it as an inquiry. That is what the questions marks were for. Or don't you know that?
Secondly I tell the person that what they provided was wrong, and they are trying to hide behind it by saying they didn't say it, and that it was the article that said it.
That doesn't fly.
That is hiding behind something.
Then, you on the other hand, are trying to say I am hiding behind a statement which I quoted to ask questions, a statement I already knew had been reported as being true. That isn't hiding behind anything.
Seems the only thing here is your confusion as to what "hiding behind something" actually is.