squawking liar doesn't help you.
Between us, you are the only one squawking and lying.
YOu said you weren't hiding since you said "if." That means by your own standard, you were hiding when you didn't say, "if."
That is some pretty idiotic logic there.
There was no cause to use "if" in the other topics. Besides the fact that there couldn't be any hiding on my part, do you really not understand that?
So I posted links to several of your posts where you did exactly that before you said, "if."
And?
Again. There was no cause to use "if" in those threads. You have no point.
What is it about that, that you do not understand?
As far as the article you linked, they had changed their article from earlier in the day which was evidenced by the title about how there would be no charges filed, which came hours after the first comment on that page. So who knows what was in it earlier?
You are making assumptions.
I knew what it said because I read it before posting and bookmarked it specifically to counter idiotic arguments like yours if need be.
I knew what it said because it was the one I found when researching what Beaudreaux said.
Because, unlike you, I bother to check things out first.
My use of what Beaudreaux said, coupled with the questions where made to prompt others to do the same. Far be it above you to understand that.
There was no hiding on my part nor could there be. A person does not hide behind true statements.
Hiding behind is a deflection from being wrong. Which is exactly what J was doing. (He didn't say it, they did.) That is hiding behind because he is the one who provided it.
Learn the damn difference before you open your mouth and start squawking your bs again.
What we do know, is that you didn't site the article you now claim fed you that information. What we also know is that you hid behind another poster who made that claim. And what we also know is that you then projected that hiding unto another poster.
Wrong!
What we do know is, there was no hiding on my part because there could be no hiding behind on my part. There is no hiding behind a true statement.
But there was hiding on J's part. That is what we know.
We also know that your logic fails at being logical.
You are wrong. Get over it and stop squawking.
:laughat:
translation: you still have no facts to back up the lie you posted, we will keep waiting. Post a link showing where i was factually wrong
we have been laughing and waiting, its hilarious you cant
facts destroy you again
:doh
I see you are just going to continue with your usual bs.
You can't even address the facts that
you know were already provided.
What a shame.
So again I say...
Translation: Dodge and deflection by Agent J.
You are still lying.
The facts have already been provided.
We can play that game as long as you like. Or you can stop lying, be honest, stop trying to change the argument and actually address what I provided.
