• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Rep. Lee Zeldin: Upcoming impeachment hearings should be postponed due to new development

L

ludin

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 3, 2013
Messages
57,470
Reaction score
14,587
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Rep. Lee Zeldin: Upcoming impeachment hearings should be postponed due to new development | Fox News

"A great answer given, a very informative answer by Mark Sandy," Zeldin said, "and I think it would change some of the answers given by some of these other witnesses this week."

Ooppsss looks like lying Schiff was trying to hide very much needed information from the public.

It also seems that lying Schiff is not being open and transparent about the testimonies either.

I wonder how many people that have testified have perjured themselves in Schiff's little game?
 
I noticed that representative Zeldin is not a member of the house intelligence committee and I don’t think he has direct knowledge regarding what is going on.
 
ludin said:
Rep. Lee Zeldin: Upcoming impeachment hearings should be postponed due to new development | Fox News

"A great answer given, a very informative answer by Mark Sandy," Zeldin said, "and I think it would change some of the answers given by some of these other witnesses this week."

Ooppsss looks like lying Schiff was trying to hide very much needed information from the public.

It also seems that lying Schiff is not being open and transparent about the testimonies either.

I wonder how many people that have testified have perjured themselves in Schiff's little game?
Click to expand...

Your desperation is showing. The impeachment hearings will go on. Sorry they are affecting you this much.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Sounds like SchiffShow stepped in it in the SCIF...
 
uh oh, trouble in schiffland?
 
If this is information damaging to Schiffty's circus, he'll do everthing he can to keep it a secret.
 
PoliSciXtina said:
Your desperation is showing. The impeachment hearings will go on. Sorry they are affecting you this much.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

More nonsense. The fact that Schiff is hiding testimony. Just shows how dishonest leftist have to be.
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
I noticed that representative Zeldin is not a member of the house intelligence committee and I don’t think he has direct knowledge regarding what is going on.
Click to expand...
But hear say can be much better than direct knowledge per D Rep Quigley :lamo

 
Unitedwestand13 said:
I noticed that representative Zeldin is not a member of the house intelligence committee and I don’t think he has direct knowledge regarding what is going on.
Click to expand...

Intelligence, Foreign Affairs and Oversight are all allowed to hear depositions. Lee Zeldin is on the Foreign Affairs Committee.
 
ludin said:
Rep. Lee Zeldin: Upcoming impeachment hearings should be postponed due to new development | Fox News

"A great answer given, a very informative answer by Mark Sandy," Zeldin said, "and I think it would change some of the answers given by some of these other witnesses this week."

Ooppsss looks like lying Schiff was trying to hide very much needed information from the public.

It also seems that lying Schiff is not being open and transparent about the testimonies either.

I wonder how many people that have testified have perjured themselves in Schiff's little game?
Click to expand...

That's the implication, that someone has perjured themselves.

There's no evidence, mind you, just an innuendo.

But since we know that the transcripts of the depositions will eventually come out, it wouldn't make any difference when the witnesses testify in public. This rep is just playing to the FOX audience who are not discerning enough to see through his facade.
 
Stealers Wheel said:
That's the implication, that someone has perjured themselves.

There's no evidence, mind you, just an innuendo.

But since we know that the transcripts of the depositions will eventually come out, it wouldn't make any difference when the witnesses testify in public. This rep is just playing to the FOX audience who are not discerning enough to see through his facade.
Click to expand...

that is all we need is accusations. it is up to those people to prove they didn't perjure themselves.
that is how this works. accusations = true until the person can prove they are innocent.

or do you now no longer support this?

actually we haven't seen these transcripts in full.
so evidently there is something that schiff is hiding which doesn't surprise me.

schiff has lied about all his evidence for the past 3 years.
 
ludin said:
Rep. Lee Zeldin: Upcoming impeachment hearings should be postponed due to new development | Fox News

"A great answer given, a very informative answer by Mark Sandy," Zeldin said, "and I think it would change some of the answers given by some of these other witnesses this week."

Ooppsss looks like lying Schiff was trying to hide very much needed information from the public.

It also seems that lying Schiff is not being open and transparent about the testimonies either.

I wonder how many people that have testified have perjured themselves in Schiff's little game?
Click to expand...

"Lee" is a girls name.

:coffeepap
 
ludin said:
that is all we need is accusations. it is up to those people to prove they didn't perjure themselves.
that is how this works. accusations = true until the person can prove they are innocent.

or do you now no longer support this?

actually we haven't seen these transcripts in full.
so evidently there is something that schiff is hiding which doesn't surprise me.

schiff has lied about all his evidence for the past 3 years.
Click to expand...

Prove all of this. It should be easy.

Prove Schiff is hiding evidence. Prove he has been lying about all "his" evidence the last 3 years.
 
Watching Jim Jordan set the trap for Schiff, and watching Schiff step into it regarding the identity of the Whistleblower was probably the highlight of the hearing for me so far.

Jordan: Two individuals?

Vidman: DAS Kent and one other indi.. person...

Jordan: And you're not willing to tell us who that other individual is?

Vidman Lawyer: Mr. Chairman, point of order..

Schiff: The Gentleman is suspended. Counsel?

Vidman Lawyer: Uh uh.. Mr. Chairman, uh.. I would ask you to uh uh... enforce the uh rule with regard to the disclosure with regard to the uh intelligence officer...

Schiff: Thank you cousel. As I indicated before, this commity will not be used to out the whistleblower. That same necessity --

Jordan: Mr. Chairman could you please stop the time so don't lose the time?

Schiff: --will persist. You are recognized, Mr. Jordan.

Jordan: Mr. Chairman, I don't see how this is outing the whistleblower. The witness has testified in his deposition that he doesn't know who the whistleblower is. YOU have said, even though noone believes you, you have said that you don't know who the whistleblower is.. so how is this outing the whistleblower to find out who this individual is?

Schiff: [blinkblinkblinkblink]



:lamo Schiff is such a lying sack of ****.
 
Slavister said:
So?

It'll come as a surprise to you - there IS significant evidence of collusion.

And no, Mueller did NOT prove there was no collusion. He only said he could not find criminal conspiracy despite clearly both Russia and Trump welcoming it and wanting it.

And finally, in case you did not hear, Roger Stone was just convicted because he lied about ... yes, Trump - Russia COLLUSION.
Click to expand...
If there is significant evidence of collusion you should have told Andrew Wiseman about it. Because he obviously found none :lol:
 
Stealers Wheel said:
That's the implication, that someone has perjured themselves.

There's no evidence, mind you, just an innuendo.

But since we know that the transcripts of the depositions will eventually come out, it wouldn't make any difference when the witnesses testify in public. This rep is just playing to the FOX audience who are not discerning enough to see through his facade.
Click to expand...
They need to see the transcript to prepare questions for the public testimony
 
If there are new developments they can be discussed at the hearings along with everything else. Nothing needs to be put on hold.

You don't shout at the judge to stop the proceedings because you have new evidence: you present the damn evidence to the court. It may change the direction of the case, it may end in conviction or acquittal, there may be a pause for further deliberation, but it doesn't just freaking 'stop'.

Neither will this.
 
SLC said:
If there is significant evidence of collusion you should have told Andrew Wiseman about it. Because he obviously found none :lol:
Click to expand...

Mueller could only investigate criminality. Collusion is not a crime. The 100's of contacts with Russian operatives during the campaign prove there was collusion. How could Trump "welcome" the Russian help if he was not colluding?
 
iguanaman said:
Mueller could only investigate criminality. Collusion is not a crime. The 100's of contacts with Russian operatives during the campaign prove there was collusion. How could Trump "welcome" the Russian help if he was not colluding?
Click to expand...

no one in the trump campaign was charged on anything for any crime.
no one in the trump campaign was charged for acting as an agent or being controled by russia
no matter how much you guys continue to lie it isn't going to change facts.

no coordination
no conspiracy
no nothing.

get over it already.

you keep confusing the dnc and clinton.
 
Last edited:
iguanaman said:
Mueller could only investigate criminality. Collusion is not a crime. The 100's of contacts with Russian operatives during the campaign prove there was collusion. How could Trump "welcome" the Russian help if he was not colluding?
Click to expand...

Mueller actually used the joke Trump spoke in a speech about Russia finding Hillary's e-mails as welcoming help.
 
ludin said:
Rep. Lee Zeldin: Upcoming impeachment hearings should be postponed due to new development | Fox News

"A great answer given, a very informative answer by Mark Sandy," Zeldin said, "and I think it would change some of the answers given by some of these other witnesses this week."

Ooppsss looks like lying Schiff was trying to hide very much needed information from the public.

It also seems that lying Schiff is not being open and transparent about the testimonies either.

I wonder how many people that have testified have perjured themselves in Schiff's little game?
Click to expand...

I started to save links to the never ending "this is going to blow the lid off of (put conservative narrative here) " threads. I'm going to add this one to it. I just have to ask, how many times are you guys going to fall for these?

Durham investigation into origins of 2016 Trump campaign surveillance expands its scope
US attorney recommends proceeding with charges against McCabe, as DOJ rejects last-ditch appeal
https://www.debatepolitics.com/brea...undation-wrongdoing.html?highlight=foundation
https://www.debatepolitics.com/brea...hreatened-obama-doj.html?highlight=foundation
https://www.debatepolitics.com/brea...-underway-read-more.html?highlight=foundation
https://www.debatepolitics.com/brea...-clintons-wedding-3.html?highlight=foundation


(editor's note: If anybody recalls any other "this is going to blow the lid off of (put conservative narrative here) " threads, please post them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom