Rand Paul names alleged whistleblower

[haymarket]

:doh:roll:

Your side didn't get the most votes, in 2016.

Doubling down on playing dumb - quite the tactic.

 

[trixare4kids]

Oh suddenly you give a crap about proof? :lamo

red herring

 

[Cameron]

I'm not sure why anyone wants to have a trial on the motives of the whistleblower, given that his/her information has all been corroborated several times over at this point, other than out of sheer partisan vengeance.

Anyway, this seems off brand for Rand Paul. I thought he was one of the few principled people (albeit with some wacko extremist principles). I don't see how threatening whistleblowers is compatible with his libertarian, small government ideology.

 

[apdst]

:doh:roll:

Doubling down on playing dumb - quite the tactic.

Are you saying that the Democrats got more votes in 2016 than the Republicans? :lamo

 

[trixare4kids]

Go on, you can do your hand raising 'seig heil' now. When Trump calls people 'human scum' and other vicious words, he inspires his own supporters first and then everyone else on social media to follow his lead. We are now living in a country where bullying and vicious personal attacks are accepted as the norm.

View attachment 67268154

Speak for yourself. You are your own keeper. You are the poster who called Rand Paul human scum. Trump didn't make you do that.

You know what you can do with your seig heil too, and your vicious lies...
I don't like when he tweets and name calls. I mentioned this yesterday when I wrote:

We've all criticized Trump. I know in fact, I've authored at least a dozen posts where I said he acts juvenile. I've said many times that he has a big mouth and it will be to his own detriment instead of conduct befitting a president. Many who can't stand Trump simply won't acknowledge the times we've said we wish he had better character.

 

[HumblePi]

Speak for yourself. You are your own keeper. You are the poster who called Rand Paul human scum. Trump didn't make you do that.

You know what you can do with your seig heil too, and your vicious lies...
I don't like when he tweets and name calls. I mentioned this yesterday when I wrote:

Yeah, I did and chose those words specifically because they worked well for you when Trump said them. Only difference is that I'm not the President of the United States who is supposed to be a world leader morally and ethically, not only politically.

If you want to tell someone you don't like Trump's viscous mouth, why don't you tell him, not us. We don't give a ****, we know how he is. You're the ones he needs to hear from, but all he gets is laughter and applause when he's being disgusting.

 

[Obscurity]

Democrats are enemies of the state. The current Nazi style show trial proves that.

And there it is folks.

There it is.

 

[Eriech]

Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul named the alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella and called for him to testify as part of the impeachment hearings.
During a Wednesday interview on Washington, D.C.-based WMAL, Paul was asked about a controversial remark he made last week when he called for the press to name the whistleblower but refused to do so himself. On Wednesday, Paul named Ciaramella and said he should be brought in to clarify whether he is indeed the whistleblower.
“I think Eric Ciaramella needs to be pulled in for testimony, and then I think it will be ultimately determined at that point,” said Paul. “But I think he is a person of interest in the sense that he was at the Ukraine desk when Joe Biden was there when Hunter Biden was working for the Ukrainian oligarch. So simply for that alone, I think he’s a material witness who needs to be brought in.”

Rand Paul names alleged whistleblower: ‘Eric Ciaramella needs to be pulled in for testimony’

---------------------------------------------------------

Rand Paul is human scum

When they find the "whistle blower" in Fort Marcy Park get back to us.......

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

 

[3leftsdoo]

And there it is folks.

There it is.

There is what?

Democrats = Criminally insane

:shrug:

 

[Checkerboard Strangler]

Of Trumpists?

Yes, because they have been spewing seditious, treasonous, traitorous garbage in their propaganda for decades. DECADES.

Decades of painting democrats as enemies of the US, as enemies of our values, as enemies of the state.

I have ZERO trust and ZERO faith in -any- of you to not resort to violence, and the WB is absolutely at threat of termination by the frothing, lunatic right wing.

And if such a thing ever were to be greenlighted, and the President and his handlers get away with it, it will fundamentally alter the fabric of this country forever.
Not in a good way at all, either.

The kind of consequences that may even reach as far as right into the everyday life of even an ordinary citizen will be so enormous as to ricochet off into the realm of what was heretofore referred to as dystopian fiction.

I'd start with maybe Franco or perhaps Pinochet. I realize that excites one or two of you and that you openly support that.
Well, that is what we will wind up with, maybe at first.
I wouldn't want to venture a guess as to how dark things could get. I can't say for sure that there is any longer a "bottom" to which no one will sink anymore if seen through such a lens.

 

[Airyaman]

The whistle blower only has to be afraid of the Democrats. If anything were to happen to him, that would be huge for the Democrats. He should be especially worried, since the impeachment lynching is falling on it's ass. Not to mention, a complaint has been filex with the IG claiming the WB is committing a felony by taking illegal contributions. The whistle blower is more valuable dead, as far as the Democrats are concerned. That is, if he actually exists. If he's a fictional character, his "murder" would be priceless.

My bull**** meter just exploded.

Do you expect people to take you seriously? If so, try harder.

 

[haymarket]

Are you saying that the Democrats got more votes in 2016 than the Republicans? :lamo

You know damn well the conversation was about Trump - and yes Clinton - got more votes than Trump. Why ion the world would I be talking about the 2017 CONGRESSIONAL House races when there was a more recent election in 2018?

You really pulled a Homer Simpson on that one. :roll:

 

[apdst]

You know damn well the conversation was about Trump - and yes Clinton - got more votes than Trump. Why ion the world would I be talking about the 2017 CONGRESSIONAL House races when there was a more recent election in 2018?

You really pulled a Homer Simpson on that one. :roll:

You said your side got more votes. I proved that you lied.

 

[veritas1]

The whistle blower only has to be afraid of the Democrats. If anything were to happen to him, that would be huge for the Democrats. He should be especially worried, since the impeachment lynching is falling on it's ass. Not to mention, a complaint has been filex with the IG claiming the WB is committing a felony by taking illegal contributions. The whistle blower is more valuable dead, as far as the Democrats are concerned. That is, if he actually exists. If he's a fictional character, his "murder" would be priceless.

Yea, the WB should be worried about being Vince Fostered, Seth Riched or Jeffrey Epsteined. We see what happens when powerful liberals get crossed.:shock:

 

[Geoist]

i'm a bit unnerved by it. first off, now Tweety zombies have a target. secondly, others are going to be hesitant to expose King Tangface's abuses of power because there's a serious risk that right wing cultists in power will expose their identities as revenge.

I agree, those are definitely reasons to be unnerved. I am thinking more in line with credibility of the whistleblower. The only reason most of the Trumpcult wants to know the identity is so they can slander the person. Unfortunately, some want to do much worse.

 

[Geoist]

But nothing other than their opinions of those people have been presented in the testimonies. Opinions don't mean **** in a trial

Witness testimony and corroboration of witness testimony means a lot even in a criminal trial.

 

[haymarket]

You said your side got more votes. I proved that you lied.

Clinton did beat Trump by over 2.8 million votes in the last presidential election.

In the last House election, the Dems also got more votes by almost 9.5 million.

Does Rod Serling narrate your posts?

 

[apdst]

Witness testimony and corroboration of witness testimony means a lot even in a criminal trial.

Hearsay don't mean ****.

 

[apdst]

Clinton did beat Trump by over 2.8 million votes in the last presidential election.

In the last House election, the Dems also got more votes by almost 9.5 million.

Does Rod Serling narrate your posts?

We're talking about 2016, not 2018.

 

[apdst]

Yea, the WB should be worried about being Vince Fostered, Seth Riched or Jeffrey Epsteined. We see what happens when powerful liberals get crossed.:shock:

Damn right he should, if he actually exists. I'm waiting for him to be "killed".

 

[Rickeroo]

Rand Paul:

he is a person of interest in the sense that he was at the Ukraine desk when Joe Biden was there and Hunter Biden was working for Ukrainian oligarchs. Simply for that, I think he is a material witness and needs to be brought in

This must be a lie. The whistleblower couldn't possibly have anything to do with Biden's firing of the Ukrainian prosecutor.

I think it would be a lot fairer for "America" if only democrats were allowed to call witnesses. Kind of selfish of Paul here.

 

[haymarket]

We're talking about 2016, not 2018.

You have utter gall to tell me what I am talking about!?!?!?!?!?!?

Amazing!!!!!!!

You are really too much.

 

[apdst]

You have utter gall to tell me what I am talking about!?!?!?!?!?!?

Amazing!!!!!!!

You are really too much.

Someone needs to, because you don't. :lamo

 

[haymarket]

Someone needs to, because you don't. :lamo

That comment makes no sense as a reply to my post that you pretended to be replying to.

Only I know what I was talking about when I write my posts. And when you make a mistake thinking otherwise and I correct you, good sense and propriety should tell you to accept it and move on. Especially when I give you evidence which is proof.