• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Question for the 'denier' cult

Just my confirmation that some people aren't open to facts - they prefer "Biden-truths".

All you have to do is present those facts.... something you already were impotent to do.
 

So why is the world warming then if all these statistics and numbers mean nothing?

I agree completely with John McCain in his speech before the Detroit Economic Club in 2008 when he said we cannot afford to NOT take action in case the science is right because if we do NOT, and the science is right, we are screwed three ways to Sunday as we can lose our planet. On the other hand, if we spend a lot of money but the warming alarms were never accurate, all we did was waste money and we still have a livable planet.

That makes a whole lot of sense.
 
So why is the world warming then if all these statistics and numbers mean nothing?

I agree completely with John McCain in his speech before the Detroit Economic Club in 2008 when he said we cannot afford to NOT take action in case the science is right because if we do NOT, and the science is right, we are screwed three ways to Sunday as we can lose our planet. On the other hand, if we spend a lot of money but the warming alarms were never accurate, all we did was waste money and we still have a livable planet.

That makes a whole lot of sense.

The world has indeed warmed, but not for the reasons commonly cited, and that makes all the difference. Here's some food for thought.
[h=2]Forbes censored an interview with me[/h]And if we waste the money, then it's not available to address real problems.
 
That AGW requires us to significantly reduce co2 to lessen its major impacts

LOL,

your inability to answer a simple question has reached legendary status:

"So what # exactly# is being denied????"

You can't do it...... :lol:
 
LOL,

your inability to answer a simple question has reached legendary status:

"So what # exactly# is being denied????"

You can't do it...... :lol:

The sentence i posted is denied by many deniers on here. Ask them.


That is a fact
 
Thank you for the information.

Could you please translate that into everyday English please? I am not a scientist and really do not get what those different numbers mean to climate change.
It basically says exactly what the consensus statements like NASA's says, and nothing more,
that Yes it has warmed over the last century, and yes Human activity is likely involved, not even a cause, only involvement without a percentage.
Scientific Consensus | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet
Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree*:
Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities.
There is uncertainty if the models can accurately predict future warming.
 
Check out the statements by all the scientific agencies on that page
When you in a hole, stop digging.

The science is inconclusive. The have established that things are changing and that human activity figures into it. That is the limit of the consensus. The crisis talked about constantly is manufactured from extreme event scenarios. Moreover the science is not properly peer reviewed in that they don't allow outside experts to have a voice.
 
Recent posts from Vegas Giants:







Just to be clear.....nasa disagrees
Hete are some of the solutions they suggest
Government Resources | Solutions – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet


The science is here. Do you deny this science is accurate?
Effects | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet

You certainly have an opinion.
Here is the scientific evidence
Evidence | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet




I did. It's all right here. If you can not read that is fine....others can. Lol
Effects | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet




Recent Photograph of Vegas Giants:

image.png


Hey boys and girls, can you say Bible Thumper? I knew you could
 
When you in a hole, stop digging.

The science is inconclusive. The have established that things are changing and that human activity figures into it. That is the limit of the consensus. The crisis talked about constantly is manufactured from extreme event scenarios. Moreover the science is not properly peer reviewed in that they don't allow outside experts to have a voice.

I await your evidence.


Oh wait.....you have none. Lol
 
Recent posts from Vegas Giants:


































Recent Photograph of Vegas Giants:

image.png


Hey boys and girls, can you say Bible Thumper? I knew you could

I report the science. You make tin foil hats. Lol
 
Back
Top Bottom