• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

PUTIN DROPS BOMB AT HELSINKI PRESSER: Says US Intelligence Helped Move $400,000,000 to HILLARY Campa

Mycroft said:
You can start with the Nunes Memo, move on to the FISA court ruling that concerns FISA 702 queries...add in the Strzok/Page memos and, for good measure, toss in the testimonies of the various DOJ and FBI pukes who have been questions by multiple Congressional Committees. And THEN, look at the actions of other Obama administration people, like Brennan and Clapper.

That is your evidence.

It all points to pervasive and wide-spread corruption throughout the entire Obama administration designed to be for Hillary and against Trump.
Click to expand...

Rare is a post that is as completely inaccurate as yours. Bravo!
 
Moot said:
I suspect they were busy grooming Trump.

What If Trump Has Been a Russian Asset Since 1987?
Click to expand...

GOP Rep. Mark Sanford, TEA-primaried out recently in South Carolina with #45’s help, is calling for dt’s tax returns, which of course all recent Presidents have done. We’ll continue to see more of this AGAINST the Freedom Caucus, dt’s last line of defense.
 
Linc said:
GOP Rep. Mark Sanford, TEA-primaried out recently in South Carolina with #45’s help, is calling for dt’s tax returns, which of course all recent Presidents have done. We’ll continue to see more of this AGAINST the Freedom Caucus, dt’s last line of defense.
Click to expand...

I'm not impressed with the has-been losers turning against Trump. Where were they when they could've made a difference?
 
Moot said:
I'm not impressed with the has-been losers turning against Trump. Where were they when they could've made a difference?
Click to expand...

Trying to win a primary, as we’ve seen since REDMAP 2010. The good news is their words are now out there 3+ months before the never-ending election cycles, something #45’s friends don’t have to sweat.
 
Tigerace117 said:
Anyone who uses facial expressions as an evaluator of whether or not to believe facts---and then goes on to fawn all over a despot----is already beyond any help mental health professionals could give them.
Click to expand...

I dunno, I kinda thought that these fairly evaluated Trump:

19-donald-trump-convention.w710.h473.jpg


26lead1.jpg


maxresdefault.jpg
 
Last edited:
Mycroft said:
I find it hard to believe that the Hillary campaign took $400 MILLION!! from foreign sources. But then, some people find it hard to believe that the Obama administration conducted a politically corrupt campaign against Trump. The thing is, we have considerable evidence that the Obama administration did exactly that, so I'd say it's worth an investigation. Perhaps the DOJ or, maybe, the FEC should look into this just to make sure.
Click to expand...

I think the Foundation might be the key to a lot of this. Uranium One, Haiti, etc all tied together.
 
Checkerboard Strangler said:
Are we talking about her emails now?
Funny, I thought we were talking about a mythical 400 gajillion dollars and the deep state.
Click to expand...

Who was Hillary sending those e-mails to? What was on those scrubbed servers?

If you're not at least slightly interested.....I can't help ya.
 
WCH said:
Who was Hillary sending those e-mails to? What was on those scrubbed servers?

If you're not at least slightly interested.....I can't help ya.
Click to expand...

What do you think about Putin's offer to investigate by having DOJ lawyers visit Russia?
 
Thoreau72 said:
What do you think about Putin's offer to investigate by having DOJ lawyers visit Russia?
Click to expand...

Calling Mueller's bluff. Doubt Mueller will go for it.

This Manafort trial might bring some eye-opening facts forward and whether this probe is truly about Russian interference or not.
 
WCH said:
Who was Hillary sending those e-mails to? What was on those scrubbed servers?

If you're not at least slightly interested.....I can't help ya.
Click to expand...

We'd all like to know what was on the RNC's scrubbed server, too. But it ain't gonna happen, so get over it.
 
Anyone remember WCH saying anything about Obama being "weak" towards Russia between 2008 and the time Trump officially announced candidacy?
 
Mr Person said:
Anyone remember WCH saying anything about Obama being "weak" towards Russia between 2008 and the time Trump officially announced candidacy?
Click to expand...

You can talk to me direct.

Obama was a weak POTUS altogether.
 
WCH said:
You can talk to me direct.

Obama was a weak POTUS altogether.
Click to expand...

I could have talked to you directly, but then when I suspect someone has said one thing quite different from what they are presently saying today based on the letter next to the name of the guy in the highest office, I tend to either go searching or ask someone else if they recall. That's because if I simply ask the person directly, they either deny, evade, or demand "links".

:shrug:



For about 8 years, Russia was supposed to be our worst enemy, our "greatest geopolitical foe" (Romney 2012), and so we were supposed to vote right-wing because Obama was "weak" and gave them Crimea. At least, that's what tons of people on the right were saying. And now, here on this sight, tons of people on the right have spent the last two years saying about Russia whatever Trump has said, which is generally that they're not doing anything wrong to us, we should be friendly with them, they're to be trusted over our intelligence apparatus because of conspiracy theories about deep states, yadda ****ing yadda. And I really don't believe that somehow, the debate boards I visited during the prior years were against all probability filled with a completely different demographic of conservative.

It's another big pile of partisan hackery. If at least one thing these people said is true on the subject, either Russia is our enemy now and they are wrong to defend Trump, or Russia was never our enemy and they were wrong to attack Obama.
 
WCH said:
Who was Hillary sending those e-mails to? What was on those scrubbed servers?

If you're not at least slightly interested.....I can't help ya.
Click to expand...

What’s on Trump’s tax returns that he’s guarded with his life?

Maybe Putin will release the emails after Trump releases his returns? Sounds like a fair trade to me.
 
WCH said:
Show me where the RNC scrubbed their servers?
Click to expand...

"....Waxman was told today by a Republican National Committee attorney Rob Kelner that "roughly 50 White House officials have had e-mail accounts on RNC servers" at some point since President Bush came to office, accounts that were controlled by the RNC." Mr. Kelner stated that to his knowledge, the earliest e-mails records of White House officials on RNC servers are from 2004. Although White House officials used RNC e-mails since 2001, the RNC has apparently destroyed all e-mail records from White House officials from 2001, 2002, and 2003."

Waxman added that the RNC "currently has e-mail records for approximately 35 of these 50 officials. This means that the RNC appears to have no e-mail records for approximately 15 White House officials who had RNC e-mail accounts."

The RNC's official policy was to delete e-mails after 30 days, but "as a result of unspecified legal inquiries, a 'hold' was placed on this e-mail destruction policy for the accounts of White House officials in August 2004." Kelner reportedly told Waxman that he was unsure "whether the hold was consistently maintained from August 2004, but he asserted that for this period, the RNC does have a large volume of White House e-mails." The "hold" also would not have prevented individual White House official from deleting their own e-mails."..."

https://www.politico.com/blogs/poli...eted-but-rove-messages-kept-from-05-on-001007​


And it looks like the RNC is busy scrubbing their server once again....

 
WCH said:
You can talk to me direct.

Obama was a weak POTUS altogether.
Click to expand...

He didn't bow down to Putin like Trump did.
 
Moot said:
"....Waxman was told today by a Republican National Committee attorney Rob Kelner that "roughly 50 White House officials have had e-mail accounts on RNC servers" at some point since President Bush came to office, accounts that were controlled by the RNC." Mr. Kelner stated that to his knowledge, the earliest e-mails records of White House officials on RNC servers are from 2004. Although White House officials used RNC e-mails since 2001, the RNC has apparently destroyed all e-mail records from White House officials from 2001, 2002, and 2003."

Waxman added that the RNC "currently has e-mail records for approximately 35 of these 50 officials. This means that the RNC appears to have no e-mail records for approximately 15 White House officials who had RNC e-mail accounts."

The RNC's official policy was to delete e-mails after 30 days, but "as a result of unspecified legal inquiries, a 'hold' was placed on this e-mail destruction policy for the accounts of White House officials in August 2004." Kelner reportedly told Waxman that he was unsure "whether the hold was consistently maintained from August 2004, but he asserted that for this period, the RNC does have a large volume of White House e-mails." The "hold" also would not have prevented individual White House official from deleting their own e-mails."..."

https://www.politico.com/blogs/poli...eted-but-rove-messages-kept-from-05-on-001007​


And it looks like the RNC is busy scrubbing their server once again....

Click to expand...

And now we know why Manafort and the corrupt RNC changed the 2016 RNC Platform to favor Russia.
 
Linc said:
And now we know why Manafort and the corrupt RNC changed the 2016 RNC Platform to favor Russia.
Click to expand...

Some might even call it collusion.
 
Mr Person said:
I could have talked to you directly, but then when I suspect someone has said one thing quite different from what they are presently saying today based on the letter next to the name of the guy in the highest office, I tend to either go searching or ask someone else if they recall. That's because if I simply ask the person directly, they either deny, evade, or demand "links".

:shrug:



For about 8 years, Russia was supposed to be our worst enemy, our "greatest geopolitical foe" (Romney 2012), and so we were supposed to vote right-wing because Obama was "weak" and gave them Crimea. At least, that's what tons of people on the right were saying. And now, here on this sight, tons of people on the right have spent the last two years saying about Russia whatever Trump has said, which is generally that they're not doing anything wrong to us, we should be friendly with them, they're to be trusted over our intelligence apparatus because of conspiracy theories about deep states, yadda ****ing yadda. And I really don't believe that somehow, the debate boards I visited during the prior years were against all probability filled with a completely different demographic of conservative.

It's another big pile of partisan hackery. If at least one thing these people said is true on the subject, either Russia is our enemy now and they are wrong to defend Trump, or Russia was never our enemy and they were wrong to attack Obama.
Click to expand...

Considering the things we know now about Russia, US actions and ongoing conspiracies on the part of the Left, there are no absolutes.

Funny how when Russia was a full-blown Communist state, the Left in this country loved them. But now their conundrum is do we hate them because we hate Trump or do we continue down a path to emulate them because we hate THIS country.?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom