- Joined
- Mar 27, 2018
- Messages
- 14,183
- Reaction score
- 21,252
- Location
- California
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
Dude you know as well as I do that prop 108 in CA brought in all kinds of "carpetbaggers" like the Mormon church who heavily financed anti-prop 108 legislation to defeat it. It's not what the people of CA really wanted. But that's all moot now because thank goodness, due to enlightened thinkers, you can now marry whomever you love.
Something to be celebrated, IMO.
Well I am glad we can agree on something. Indeed, it is something to be celebrated, if only because I believe everyone should find love through healthy monogamous relationships, whether gay or straight. But even though the Mormon Church undertook a huge advertisement campaign, it was not legislators who were bought and sold. The decision was not made in the California legislature. Individual Californian citizens who may have been influenced by these advertisements, or may have had a preexisting animus towards the idea of gay marriage, went and voted away the rights of their fellow citizens. You can call them dupes. You can call them bigots. You can call them backwards. You can call them backwards bigoted dupes. But they still made that free decision for any number of reasons, and when the ballots were counted, the right of gay citizens to marry who they loved was dead.
So again, what a majority within any given society wants is not necessarily a good thing. So let us dispense with tyranny of the majority, and go back to discussing how best to determine whether any given policy is the correct one to be enacted, whether a majority of society wants it or not.