- Joined
- Dec 20, 2009
- Messages
- 75,707
- Reaction score
- 39,986
- Location
- USofA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Reasonable, interesting qualifier there. So basically, they didn't say something you agreed with?
i'm applying the kind of logic that the law seeks "a reasonable person" type stuff. to preclude canards such as "fine, my metric is whether or not the topic is income oops grades aren't income therefore it's totally not the same". i want to see a real, rational explanation for why we should treat income and grades differently, when both are the product of the same complex swirl of individual and social factors?