• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Pride

Good4Nothin

DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 24, 2018
Messages
13,230
Reaction score
2,912
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Slightly Conservative
People are very confused. Well what else is new. But especially about the word "racism."

We don't see anything wrong with black pride or gay pride. Minorities are allowed to be proud of their group identity. However, white pride is considered racism.

There is a long history of white pride, of looking down at non-white races and ethnic groups. There was the famous "White man's burden," for example. Lots of people felt this way until not so long ago. Now most people who feel that way keep it secret, because it's taboo.

But the feelings of superiority of Europeans and European-Americans is based on the fact that most of the inventions and discoveries of the modern world came from their culture.

I do NOT think that was because of their whiteness, or their European ethnicity! It was a chain of historical accidents that caused Europe to be the center of invention and discovery. They were primitive raiders and herders when there were advanced civilizations in Africa, Asia, and America. But then things happened, and here we are. No one in Africa invented a telescope or a microscope.

White nationalism is really ethnic pride. It is arrogant and obnoxious, yes. But you can't simply shut it down, because they do have things to be proud of. Well, not really, since most of the white nationalists are dumb and never invented anything.

My point is that it's complicated. White pride is partly a reaction to black pride, gay pride, feminism, etc. There is so much contempt now for "old white men." There is really no admiration any more for the great discoverers and adventurers. Columbus is despised now because he wasn't nice to the natives. The guy was a visionary, brave explorer, and you expect him to also be a sweetheart and lover of natives?

White men have done the most to create our modern world. I think our modern world is actually more bad than good. But credit for the bad, and the good, goes mostly to white men. NOT women! I am a woman, and I can face the fact that women have accomplished VERY LITTLE compared to men! NOT because we are inferior, but because of social roles and restrictions.
 
Did Stormfront ban alcohol or something?
 
There's no reason to have pride over an identity.
 
There's no reason to have pride over an identity.

Maybe not. But why is it considered ok to be proud of being black or gay?
 
People are very confused. Well what else is new. But especially about the word "racism."

We don't see anything wrong with black pride or gay pride. Minorities are allowed to be proud of their group identity. However, white pride is considered racism.

There is a long history of white pride, of looking down at non-white races and ethnic groups. There was the famous "White man's burden," for example. Lots of people felt this way until not so long ago. Now most people who feel that way keep it secret, because it's taboo.

But the feelings of superiority of Europeans and European-Americans is based on the fact that most of the inventions and discoveries of the modern world came from their culture.

I do NOT think that was because of their whiteness, or their European ethnicity! It was a chain of historical accidents that caused Europe to be the center of invention and discovery. They were primitive raiders and herders when there were advanced civilizations in Africa, Asia, and America. But then things happened, and here we are. No one in Africa invented a telescope or a microscope.

White nationalism is really ethnic pride. It is arrogant and obnoxious, yes. But you can't simply shut it down, because they do have things to be proud of. Well, not really, since most of the white nationalists are dumb and never invented anything.

My point is that it's complicated. White pride is partly a reaction to black pride, gay pride, feminism, etc. There is so much contempt now for "old white men." There is really no admiration any more for the great discoverers and adventurers. Columbus is despised now because he wasn't nice to the natives. The guy was a visionary, brave explorer, and you expect him to also be a sweetheart and lover of natives?

White men have done the most to create our modern world. I think our modern world is actually more bad than good. But credit for the bad, and the good, goes mostly to white men. NOT women! I am a woman, and I can face the fact that women have accomplished VERY LITTLE compared to men! NOT because we are inferior, but because of social roles and restrictions.

I think you're correct in a way. White pride isn't so much based on what whites have done in the past, but the esteem and expectations we hold for ourselves. As to why 'white' or 'straight' parades are looked upon as vulgar, these are considered the normal and superior modes of being - the 'normal'.

Take a retard parade. They are allowed to parade because they are pitied and looked upon as inferior, but we'd feel better about it if we called them 'developmentally disabled'. But the esteem we have for them doesn't increase. When someone sets up a "Normal IQ" parade, it's looked at as insulting and vulgar. This is kind of the same dynamic when straight or white pride parades are done.
 
I think you're correct in a way. White pride isn't so much based on what whites have done in the past, but the esteem and expectations we hold for ourselves. As to why 'white' or 'straight' parades are looked upon as vulgar, these are considered the normal and superior modes of being - the 'normal'.

Take a retard parade. They are allowed to parade because they are pitied and looked upon as inferior, but we'd feel better about it if we called them 'developmentally disabled'. But the esteem we have for them doesn't increase. When someone sets up a "Normal IQ" parade, it's looked at as insulting and vulgar. This is kind of the same dynamic when straight or white pride parades are done.

I understand what you mean. Black pride and gay pride are reactions to having been oppressed. So it's tolerated and even approved of.

Whites don't have a right to be proud of being white, according to current progressives, because they weren't oppressed. However, many whites do feel oppressed now. They are having financial trouble and no one cared, until Trump. Not that Trump really cares, but he says he does.

White men see the country as being over-run by non-whites, and it is. They feel despised by progressives, and they are. They see their European-American culture as being despised, and it is.

So white pride is a reaction. It is not really different from black pride.

And guns are a big symbol for this movement. Guns symbolize toughness, maleness, the ability to defend yourself.

I understand where these people are coming from. Progressives just dismiss them as deplorable haters.
 
Idk. Its dumb. In my mind all of it is "ok", its just stupid. I don't begrudge fellow crackers from having pride in their white identity, I just think its incredibly stupid.

I do begrudge people and ideologies who use identify for political advantage. At *best it is a double standard At worst, it is cynical profiteering and/or whining like little bitches - apologies to dogs and Dog Pride.



Maybe not. But why is it considered ok to be proud of being black or gay?
 
Idk. Its dumb. In my mind all of it is "ok", its just stupid. I don't begrudge fellow crackers from having pride in their white identity, I just think its incredibly stupid.

I do begrudge people and ideologies who use identify for political advantage. At *best it is a double standard At worst, it is cynical profiteering and/or whining like little bitches - apologies to dogs and Dog Pride.

I don't like identity politics at all. I never was a feminist. And notice we don't have a Jewish pride movement. That's because we don't need one -- Jews have proven they can succeed in the modern world.
 
I understand what you mean. Black pride and gay pride are reactions to having been oppressed. So it's tolerated and even approved of.

Whites don't have a right to be proud of being white, according to current progressives, because they weren't oppressed. However, many whites do feel oppressed now. They are having financial trouble and no one cared, until Trump. Not that Trump really cares, but he says he does.

White men see the country as being over-run by non-whites, and it is. They feel despised by progressives, and they are. They see their European-American culture as being despised, and it is.

So white pride is a reaction. It is not really different from black pride.

And guns are a big symbol for this movement. Guns symbolize toughness, maleness, the ability to defend yourself.

I understand where these people are coming from. Progressives just dismiss them as deplorable haters.

I'll fine-tune the dynamic. Think about a Polish festival, then next week the Lithuanians set up their festival. Nobody bats an eye- because Polish identity isn't based on anything Lithuanian. Black identity in America has a lot do do with whites. We can't talk about blacks without whites somehow making it into the conversation. It's kind of sad when a race's identity is so tied up with another's. Imagine if when we talked about whites, the Chinese always came up. I wouldn't want that kind of racial dependency.
 
My advice to my fellow "whitey's." Adapt and improvise. It's a new age and there are no protections guaranteeing us we get to stay in charge of the plantation.

You got problems with people who don't all sit down together at the table at supper time? Adapt and improvise.

You got problem with men who don't step up and be a father like the father you had? Adapt and improvise.

You got problems with car jackings and drive-by's? Adapt and improvise.

You got problems with filth and urban decay in the inner-cities? Adapt and improvise.

You got a problem working 2 jobs to stay ahead, all the while contributing to the pockets of those who will not do so? Adapt and improvise.

You got a problem with pop culture embracing, what some people call music, that glorifies violence and what you consider to be anti-social traits? Adapt and improvise.

Does cheap, gaudy jewelry, ugly tattoo's and "pants on the ground" offend you? First off, get a life and quit being such a ninny butt and THEN adapt and improvise.

Face it. It's about cultural differences. It's not about the color of one's skin.

But since the culture that seems to offend "whitey" the most usually happen to share a common skin color, you can't criticize these, what you think are, anti-social traits because that would make you racist.

So just keep your mouth shut and adapt and improvise. You can't win.
 
Your skin color to me is irrelevant. As long as you are a decent human being, we won't have any problems.

The moment you crap on me or my family, there's gonna be trouble.
 
Every time a group gets together to talk about "white pride" their entire conversation revolves around how terrible all those other people are.
 
I'll fine-tune the dynamic. Think about a Polish festival, then next week the Lithuanians set up their festival. Nobody bats an eye- because Polish identity isn't based on anything Lithuanian. Black identity in America has a lot do do with whites. We can't talk about blacks without whites somehow making it into the conversation. It's kind of sad when a race's identity is so tied up with another's. Imagine if when we talked about whites, the Chinese always came up. I wouldn't want that kind of racial dependency.

An entire culture that exists because white people relocated them and deliberately destroyed the original culture. So, yeah, white people come up in conversation.
 
I'll fine-tune the dynamic. Think about a Polish festival, then next week the Lithuanians set up their festival. Nobody bats an eye- because Polish identity isn't based on anything Lithuanian. Black identity in America has a lot do do with whites. We can't talk about blacks without whites somehow making it into the conversation. It's kind of sad when a race's identity is so tied up with another's. Imagine if when we talked about whites, the Chinese always came up. I wouldn't want that kind of racial dependency.

Yes, many whites owned blacks, in the past. But many African blacks owned African blacks, in the past, and actually some still do.

Egyptians owned Hebrews, in the past. Almost every race and ethnic group was owned by someone at some time.

Women were considered their husband's possession, until not long ago. That doesn't make me hate all men.
 
Face it. It's about cultural differences. It's not about the color of one's skin.

Right. That's what progressives today fail to understand.

White people don't like being white, and therefore we have tanning salons. This is not about skin color.
 
It seems the "proud" marchers in Boston loved them some Trump. It certainly looked like a lot more proud boys than girls.
 
An entire culture that exists because white people relocated them and deliberately destroyed the original culture. So, yeah, white people come up in conversation.

They were sold by blacks in Africa. So if you are going to blame whites for this, you should also go back a step and blame the African slave traders.
 
There's no reason to have pride over an identity.

Why not? People root for the country in sports... nothing wrong with that... or a women's team vs. a men's team.
 
Maybe not. But why is it considered ok to be proud of being black or gay?

Because for generations Blacks and others were made to feel inferior.

Black Pride is really just about shedding the sense of inferiority and shame imposed upon them.

Context is everything.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Why not? People root for the country in sports... nothing wrong with that... or a women's team vs. a men's team.

Everyone has to have pride in SOMETHING. Most Americans are proud of this country, or should be.

Parents are proud of their children. Workers are proud of their work. Good-looking people are proud of their looks. Smart people are proud of their brains.

How are you going to stamp out all forms of pride? You can't.
 
Everyone has to have pride in SOMETHING. Most Americans are proud of this country, or should be.

Parents are proud of their children. Workers are proud of their work. Good-looking people are proud of their looks. Smart people are proud of their brains.

How are you going to stamp out all forms of pride? You can't.

We can try though...
 
They were sold by blacks in Africa. So if you are going to blame whites for this, you should also go back a step and blame the African slave traders.

Not relevant to this conversation. Why do people always try to excuse slavery with this fact?
 
People are very confused. Well what else is new. But especially about the word "racism."

We don't see anything wrong with black pride or gay pride. Minorities are allowed to be proud of their group identity. However, white pride is considered racism.

There is a long history of white pride, of looking down at non-white races and ethnic groups. There was the famous "White man's burden," for example. Lots of people felt this way until not so long ago. Now most people who feel that way keep it secret, because it's taboo.

But the feelings of superiority of Europeans and European-Americans is based on the fact that most of the inventions and discoveries of the modern world came from their culture.

I do NOT think that was because of their whiteness, or their European ethnicity! It was a chain of historical accidents that caused Europe to be the center of invention and discovery. They were primitive raiders and herders when there were advanced civilizations in Africa, Asia, and America. But then things happened, and here we are. No one in Africa invented a telescope or a microscope.

White nationalism is really ethnic pride. It is arrogant and obnoxious, yes. But you can't simply shut it down, because they do have things to be proud of. Well, not really, since most of the white nationalists are dumb and never invented anything.

My point is that it's complicated. White pride is partly a reaction to black pride, gay pride, feminism, etc. There is so much contempt now for "old white men." There is really no admiration any more for the great discoverers and adventurers. Columbus is despised now because he wasn't nice to the natives. The guy was a visionary, brave explorer, and you expect him to also be a sweetheart and lover of natives?

White men have done the most to create our modern world. I think our modern world is actually more bad than good. But credit for the bad, and the good, goes mostly to white men. NOT women! I am a woman, and I can face the fact that women have accomplished VERY LITTLE compared to men! NOT because we are inferior, but because of social roles and restrictions.

Ah, I love these threads. They always end well :roll:
 
Everyone has to have pride in SOMETHING. Most Americans are proud of this country, or should be.

Parents are proud of their children. Workers are proud of their work. Good-looking people are proud of their looks. Smart people are proud of their brains.

How are you going to stamp out all forms of pride? You can't.

Nobody is trying to stamp out all forms of pride.
We have white culture in this country, and white people are proud of that culture. Have you heard of the Irish? The Germans? The Swiss? The English? These are all white cultures that people take pride in. They hand down traditions from generation to generation. My family still eats blood sausage at Christmas. (if you haven't tried it...uh... don't)

Chinese culture is celebrated. Japanese culture is celebrated. Mexican culture is celebrated.

Black people are different. There's a reason for it: this heritage was deliberately taken away from them. Most of them can't trace their ancestry to Zaire or Congo or Sudan. That information was not allowed to pass from generation to generation. The culture was not allowed to pass from generation to generation. Even their religion was forcibly changed. So they had to develop a new culture, around the only thing they really had in common. A history in chains.

And every last bit of this occurred under the whip of a white owner. That's why oppression by white people is a common thread in black culture. It's literally why black culture exists. Yeah, a black person was on the selling point a dozen generations ago, and that's terrible, but that black person didn't make the slaves learn English or convert to Christianity. It's not relevant to a discussion like this.
 
Back
Top Bottom